Mixed Reality in Art Education

In this paper both receptive and productive Augmented Reality (AR)/Virtual Realty (VR)-Concepts to teach art are presented and discussed. Receptive means learning about art as an (immersed) spectator while productive means offering opportunities for own mixed reality artistic creations. The prototypes presented are pioneer research in terms of VR and AR, so called Mixed Reality (MR), informed art education. One of the core aims is to exemplify art educational applications by exploring usage of MR beyond traditional. The three MR based art educational concepts presented here invite users to experience art in heterogenous spatial contexts. MR is used here to highlight semantics of historically and art historically relevant spaces offering immersive as well as creative and participatory ways of learning. Three prototypes of MR informed art education are presented. First, a AR-based art history city guide is described with integration of teacher-based evaluation. Art is taught here in an interdisciplinary approach as situated learning experience visiting Munich's art historical sites and architecture. Teachers' attitudes towards AR/VR-based art history learning were conducted after trial of one of the applications. According to the educator's feedback, motivation, attention but also spatial imagination and perception are estimated to be fostered. Next, an AR-based installation of a missing painting by Franz Marc is presented conveying complex meanings of both architecture in art historical context as well as the art work itself. Finally, an immersive VR-art educational concept integrating two paintings of Caspar David Friedrich is described, offering sequential ways to inform about the painting's iconography. When it comes to implementing MR-concepts in day-to-day practice, media competence as well es technology acceptance or media cultural negotiations are vital aspects beyond the questions of it-technological equipment and infrastructure.

[1]  Simon Davis,et al.  A Systematic Review of Cybersickness , 2014, IE.

[2]  Wolfram Schulz,et al.  International Computer and Information Literacy Study: ICILS 2013: Technical Report , 2015 .

[3]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Jorge Brieva,et al.  Thoughts and emotion assimilation and detonation through VR for people with ASD , 2018, Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis.

[5]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[6]  Lily Díaz-Kommonen Interactive Diorama: A Virtual Reality (VR) Reconstruction of The Anatomy Lesson of Doctor Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt, 1632 , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct).

[7]  Jan Hellriegel,et al.  Das Potenzial von Virtual Reality für den schulischen Unterricht - Eine konstruktivistische Sicht , 2018, MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung.

[8]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[9]  Matt Bower,et al.  Augmented reality in Education — Cases, places, and potentials , 2013, 2013 IEEE 63rd Annual Conference International Council for Education Media (ICEM).

[10]  Michela Ott,et al.  A LITERATURE REVIEW ON IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY IN EDUCATION: STATE OF THE ART AND PERSPECTIVES. , 2015, 11th International Conference eLearning and Software for Education.

[11]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion Is Enough? , 2007, Computer.

[12]  Giovambattista Presti,et al.  Testing the effectiveness of virtual reality as a defusion technique for coping with unwanted thoughts , 2018, Virtual Reality.

[13]  Christine Youngblut,et al.  Educational Uses of Virtual Reality Technology. , 1998 .

[14]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  An experimental study on the role of augmented reality content type in an outdoor site exploration , 2018, Behav. Inf. Technol..