Minimal surface as a model of β‐sheets

The purpose of this article is to present arguments based on experimental data that the β‐sheet structures in proteins are the result of the tendency to minimize surface areas. Thus, we propose the model that all β‐sheet structures are almost minimal surfaces, namely, their mean curvatures are nearly zero. To support this model, we chose 1740 disjoint β‐sheets with less than 10 strands from the all β‐protein class in a nonredundant 40% Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database and applied the least‐squares method to fit the minimal surface catenoid (and in some rare cases, the plane) to the β‐sheet structures. The fitting errors were extremely small: The error of 1729 β‐sheets with catenoid minimal surface is 0.90 ± 0.55 Å and the error of the remaining 11 flat sheets with the plane is 0.64 ± 0.46 Å. The fact that the commonly used models for some β‐sheet surfaces (i.e., the hyperboloid and strophoid) have very small mean curvatures (< 0.05) supports our model. Moreover, we showed that this model also includes the isotropically stressed configuration model proposed by Salemme, in which the intrastrand tendency of the individual chains to twist or coil is in equilibrium with the tendency of the interstrand hydrogen bonding to resist twisting of the sheet as a whole. As an application we used our model to quantify the two principal independent modes in the flexibility of β‐sheets, that is, the bending parameter of β‐sheets and the inclined angle of β‐strands in a sheet. Proteins 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  F R Salemme,et al.  Conformational and geometrical properties of beta-sheets in proteins. III. Isotropically stressed configurations. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[3]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Flexibility of β‐sheets: Principal component analysis of database protein structures , 2004, Proteins.

[4]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Effect of amino acid composition on the twist and the relative stability of parallel and antiparallel .beta.-sheets , 1983 .

[5]  A. Olofsson,et al.  A comparative analysis of 23 structures of the amyloidogenic protein transthyretin. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Flexibility of alpha-helices: results of a statistical analysis of database protein structures. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  J Chomilier,et al.  Beta-sheet modeling by helical surfaces. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[8]  H. Piaggio Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces , 1952, Nature.

[9]  F. Salemme,et al.  Conformational and geometrical properties of β-sheets in proteins: I. Parallel β-sheets☆ , 1981 .

[10]  L. Pauling,et al.  The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. , 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Structure of beta-sheets. Origin of the right-handed twist and of the increased stability of antiparallel over parallel sheets. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  S J Wodak,et al.  Structural principles of parallel beta-barrels in proteins. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  B. Honig,et al.  Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: I. alpha-Helices. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Flexibility of α-Helices: Results of a Statistical Analysis of Database Protein Structures , 2003 .

[15]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Molecular simulations of beta-sheet twisting. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  S J Oatley,et al.  Structure of prealbumin: secondary, tertiary and quaternary interactions determined by Fourier refinement at 1.8 A. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  R. Bruccoleri,et al.  Twisted hyperboloid (Strophoid) as a model of beta-barrels in proteins. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  F. Salemme,et al.  Conformational and geometrical properties of β-sheets in proteins: II. Antiparallel and mixed β-sheets , 1981 .

[19]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  L. Pauling,et al.  Configurations of Polypeptide Chains With Favored Orientations Around Single Bonds: Two New Pleated Sheets. , 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  H A Scheraga,et al.  Origin of the right-handed twist of beta-sheets of poly(LVal) chains. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Cyrus Chothia,et al.  Conformation of twisted β-pleated sheets in proteins , 1973 .

[23]  M. Docarmo Differential geometry of curves and surfaces , 1976 .

[24]  B. Honig,et al.  Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: II. Antiparallel beta-sheets. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Jacques Chomilier,et al.  β-Sheet modeling by helical surfaces , 2000 .

[26]  E. Milner-White,et al.  Coulombic attractions between partially charged main-chain atoms stabilise the right-handed twist found in most beta-strands. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Role of interchain interactions in the stabilization of the right-handed twist of beta-sheets. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.