Fostering linguistic decision-making under uncertainty: A proportional interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on Hamacher aggregation operators and andness optimization models

Abstract Interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2 FS) have played a prominent role in the development of type-2 (T2) fuzzy logic and fuzzy systems for application to linguistic approximation transformations. Although there have been a number of studies of individual linguistic perception understanding based on T2 fuzzy logic, few of these have paid attention to the computational manipulation of group linguistic perceptions based on IT2 FS theory and methods. Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (PHFLTSs) allow conceptualization of group linguistic perceptions with the inclusion of generalized linguistic terms and their associated proportions. Interpreting PHFLTSs from the viewpoint of T2 fuzzy logic instead of its type-1 counterpart has the potential to provide useful results because of the ability of IT2 FSs to accurately model individual comprehension in the presence of linguistic uncertainty. This paper brings a novel perspective to encoding PHFLTSs based on the concept of a proportional interval T2 hesitant fuzzy set (PIT2 HFS). PIT2 HFSs combine IT2 FSs translated from generalized linguistic terms together with their proportional information. To facilitate computing with PIT2 HFSs, basic operations satisfying the closure property are defined for PIT2 HFSs based on Archimedean t-norms and s-norms. Information measurements such as a distance and a score function for PIT2 HFS are also defined. Two instrumental aggregation operators for PIT2 HFSs, namely, the Hamacher proportional interval T2 hesitant fuzzy power weighted average (Ham-PIT2HPWA) operator and the Hamacher proportional interval T2 hesitant fuzzy power weighted geometric (Ham-PIT2HPWG) operator, are investigated, and their limiting cases with respect to various parameters are discussed. Furthermore, two andness optimization models with the andness measure being the attitudinal character are constructed in a bid to determine reasonable parameter values associated with the Ham-PIT2HPWA and Ham-PIT2HPWG operators. On the basis of the Hamacher aggregation operators and the andness optimization models, a proportional interval T2 hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS approach is developed to provide linguistic decision making under uncertainty. The proposed approach represents a novel paradigm for linguistic group decision making under the umbrella of T2 fuzzy logic and systems for computing with words that has potential for application in real-life scenarios.

[1]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[2]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Computing with words and its relationships with fuzzistics , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[3]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[4]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Yi Yang,et al.  Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for multiple criteria group decision making , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[7]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Fuzzy sets for words: a new beginning , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2003. FUZZ '03..

[8]  Radko Mesiar,et al.  Weighted triangular norms-based aggregation operators , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[9]  M. Gorzałczany A method for inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets , 1987 .

[10]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  The power average operator , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[11]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy set and its application in multi-criteria decision making , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[12]  Brahim Ouhbi,et al.  Expertise-based consensus building for MCGDM with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[13]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[14]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[15]  Siegfried Gottwald,et al.  Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic , 1993 .

[16]  Lazim Abdullah,et al.  A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  Two-stage aggregation paradigm for HFLTS possibility distributions: A hierarchical clustering perspective , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  A comparative study of ranking methods, similarity measures and uncertainty measures for interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[19]  Lazim Abdullah,et al.  Integration of fuzzy AHP and interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL: An application to human resource management , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Type-2 Fuzzistics for Symmetric Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: Part 1, Forward Problems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[21]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Thomas A. Runkler,et al.  Interval type-2 fuzzy decision making , 2017, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[23]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  An Overview on Fuzzy Modelling of Complex Linguistic Preferences in Decision Making , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[24]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Power-Geometric Operators and Their Use in Group Decision Making , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[25]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making. Towards high quality progress , 2016, Inf. Fusion.

[26]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[27]  Jindong Qin Interval type-2 fuzzy Hamy mean operators and their application in multiple criteria decision making , 2017, GRC 2017.

[28]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  The extended QUALIFLEX method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to medical decision making , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy logic = computing with words , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[31]  Humberto Bustince,et al.  A Practical Guide to Averaging Functions , 2015, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[32]  Luis Martínez,et al.  Customizing Semantics for Individuals With Attitudinal HFLTS Possibility Distributions , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[33]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making , 2018, Neural Computing and Applications.

[34]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  On clarifying some definitions and notations used for type-2 fuzzy sets as well as some recommended changes , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[35]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[36]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[37]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  Analyzing project cash flow by a new interval type-2 fuzzy model with an application to construction industry , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[38]  Yi Yang,et al.  Interval-valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Frank Power Aggregation Operators based on An Isomorphic Frank Dual Triple , 2018, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[39]  J.M. Mendel,et al.  Computing with Words: Zadeh, Turing, Popper and Occam , 2007, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[40]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[41]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  From Computing with Numbers to Computing with Words - from Manipulation of Measurements to Manipulation of Perceptions , 2005, Logic, Thought and Action.

[42]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Aggregation Using the Linguistic Weighted Average and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[43]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attributes Group Decision-Making Based on Ranking Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets and the TOPSIS Method , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.