Limited Availability Reduces the Rate of Satiation

In general, consumers enjoy products less with repeated consumption. Unfortunately, there are few known ways to slow such satiation. The authors show that consumers satiate more slowly on a product when it is available for consumption only at limited times. Specifically, they find that perceived limited availability made a product more enjoyable, and yet this effect largely emerged only after repeated consumption. The authors attribute this finding to an urge to take advantage of a rare consumption opportunity, which leads people to pay less attention to the quantity consumed and subsequently to experience less satiation. A series of studies establish the effect of perceived limited availability on the rate of satiation, show that it influences how much people eat, provide mediation evidence of the proposed theoretical account, and eliminate the effect by making salient the total amount consumed. The authors conclude with implications of these findings.

[1]  Danielle Dragoo,et al.  When to say when. , 2014, Resuscitation.

[2]  Kelly L. Haws,et al.  Healthy Satiation: The Role of Decreasing Desire in Effective Self-Control , 2012 .

[3]  K. Flegal,et al.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. , 2012, JAMA.

[4]  S. Higgs,et al.  Television watching during lunch increases afternoon snack intake of young women , 2009, Appetite.

[5]  Jaime L. Kurtz Looking to the Future to Appreciate the Present , 2008, Psychological science.

[6]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Interrupted Consumption: Disrupting Adaptation to Hedonic Experiences , 2008 .

[7]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[8]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Flying under the radar: Perverse package size effects on consumption self-regulation , 2008 .

[9]  J. Redden,et al.  Reducing Satiation: The Role of Categorization Level , 2008 .

[10]  Andrea Maier,et al.  Sensory-specific satiety, its crossovers, and subsequent choice of potato chip flavors , 2007, Appetite.

[11]  Joseph C. Nunes,et al.  License to Sin: The Liberating Role of Reporting Expectations , 2007, The Journal of consumer research.

[12]  B. Wansink,et al.  Counting Bones: Environmental Cues That Decrease Food Intake , 2007, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  J. Brunstrom,et al.  Effects of distraction on the development of satiety. , 2006, The British journal of nutrition.

[14]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice , 2006 .

[15]  L. Epstein,et al.  Effects of allocation of attention on habituation to olfactory and visual food stimuli in children , 2005, Physiology & Behavior.

[16]  Brian Wansink,et al.  Why Visual Cues of Portion Size May Influence Intake , 2004, Obesity research.

[17]  Julie R. Irwin,et al.  Walking the Hedonic Product Treadmill: Default Contrast and Mood-Based Assimilation in Judgments of Predicted Happiness with a Target Product , 2001 .

[18]  S. Swindell,et al.  General-process theories of motivation revisited: The role of habituation. , 1999 .

[19]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. , 1999 .

[20]  J. Inman,et al.  Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value , 1997 .

[21]  K. Berridge Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking , 1996, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[22]  B. Wansink Can Package Size Accelerate Usage Volume? , 1995 .

[23]  H. Robben,et al.  Scarcity and preference: an experiment on unavailability and product evaluation , 1994 .

[24]  Ingrid M. Martin,et al.  When to Say When: Effects of Supply on Usage , 1993 .

[25]  Z. Vickers,et al.  Factors influencing sensory-specific satiety , 1992, Appetite.

[26]  Michael Lynn,et al.  Scarcity's Enhancement of Desirability: The Role of Naive Economic Theories , 1992 .

[27]  Marianne C. Votaw,et al.  How important is hedonism? Reasons given by college students for ending a meal , 1992, Appetite.

[28]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Melioration: A Theory of Distributed Choice , 1991 .

[29]  Michael Lynn,et al.  Scarcity effects on desirability: mediated by assumed expensiveness? , 1989 .

[30]  Theo M.M. Verhallen,et al.  Scarcity and consumer choice behavior , 1982 .

[31]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  Sensory specific satiety in man , 1981, Physiology & Behavior.

[32]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  Effects of Supply and Demand on Ratings of Object Value , 1975 .

[33]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[34]  Jacob Beck,et al.  Adaptation-level theory. , 1974 .

[35]  H. Fromkin Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Jeff Galak,et al.  Variety Amnesia : Recalling Past Variety Can Accelerate Recovery from Satiation , 2009 .

[37]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  INTERRUPTED CONSUMPTION: ADAPTATION AND THE DISRUPTION OF HEDONIC EXPERIENCE , 2006 .

[38]  C. Coombs,et al.  Single-Peaked Functions and the Theory of Preference , 1977 .

[39]  D. Campbell,et al.  Hedonic relativism and planning the good society , 1971 .

[40]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  10 – Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change1 , 1968 .

[41]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. , 1966, Psychological review.

[42]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .