How Do People View Multi-Component Animated Maps?

Abstract Quite a few examples in the cartographic and information visualisation literature suggest that multi-component animated maps may be appropriate for examining complex spatio-temporal phenomena. Such space–time visualisations typically consist of multiple dynamic map or data windows, linked by means of interactive tools. Little empirical evidence exists, however, providing support of the potential advantages of such complex visual space–time displays. This research aimed at filling this gap. An empirical study was carried out to obtain insight on how multi-component animated maps are used to explore dynamic spatio-temporal phenomena. We examined which particular components attract users’ attention and in what sequence, and whether display effectiveness can be characterized by users’ viewing behaviours. Based on behavioural data collected with the eye-tracking method, we find that component size, and employed dynamic variables attracted users’ attention most. We are also able to identify visual behaviour patterns that result in performance differences between participants, using multi-component animated map. Finally, we highlight component layout design issues that should be further examined empirically, in order to reduce potential split attention effects.

[1]  Jonathan C. Roberts,et al.  Exploratory Visualization with Multiple Linked Views , 2004 .

[2]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Frank Hardisty,et al.  Cartographic Animation in Three Dimensions : Experimenting with the Scene Graph , 2001 .

[4]  Philippe De Maeyer,et al.  Analyzing eye movement patterns to improve map design , 2010 .

[5]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Mark Harrower,et al.  MOVING BEYOND NOVELTY: CREATING EFFECTIVE 3-d FLY-OVER MAPS , 2005 .

[7]  Clarke Wilson,et al.  ClustalG: Software for analysis of activities and sequential events , 1999 .

[8]  Terje Midtbø PERCEPTION OF TIME VARIABLES ON DYNAMIC , 2012 .

[9]  L. Itti,et al.  Modeling the influence of task on attention , 2005, Vision Research.

[10]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Interactive Map Interface Designs: A Case Study Integrating Usability Metrics with Eye-Movement Analysis , 2009 .

[11]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Cognitive Map-Design Research in the Twentieth Century: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches , 2002 .

[12]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview , 1998 .

[13]  Durk Talsma,et al.  Attentional orienting across the sensory modalities , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Saccadic Eye Movements , 1967 .

[15]  Simone Garlandini,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Visual Variables for Geographic Information Visualization , 2009, COSIT.

[16]  Lorenz Hurni,et al.  Multimedia Atlas Information Systems , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[17]  Michael S. Ambinder,et al.  Change blindness , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Attention and Scene Understanding , 2005 .

[19]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  Cartographic animation and legends for temporal maps : exporation and or interaction , 1997 .

[20]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Ernst Niebur,et al.  Attention to Tactile Stimuli Increases Neural Synchrony in Somatosensory Cortex , 2005 .

[22]  T. Opach,et al.  Zastosowanie okulografii (techniki eye-tracking) w kartografii , 2011 .

[23]  Gennady L. Andrienko,et al.  Interactive maps for visual data exploration , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Lars Brodersen,et al.  Applying eye-movement tracking for the study of map perception and map design , 2001 .

[25]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[26]  J. May,et al.  White Rose Consortium Eprints Repository Insensitivity of Visual Short-term Memory to Irrelevant Visual Information , 2022 .

[27]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Sound increases the saliency of visual events , 2008, Brain Research.

[28]  Debarati Guha-Sapir,et al.  Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2009The numbers and trends , 2010 .

[29]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  Exploring the efficiency of users' visual analytics strategies based on sequence analysis of eye movement recordings , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Mark Monmonier,et al.  Authoring Graphic Scripts: Experiences and Principles , 1992 .

[31]  Lorenz Hurni,et al.  Visualization of change in the interactive multimedia atlas of Switzerland , 2000 .

[32]  Bernhard Jenny,et al.  Modular Web-Based Atlas Information Systems , 2006, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[33]  R. Brunet Bertin (Jacques). Sémiologie graphique. Paris, Mouton et Gauthier- Villars, 1967 , 1968 .

[34]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Eyetracking Web Usability , 2009 .

[35]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[36]  Laura Ruel,et al.  NIELSEN, J.; PERNICE, K. Eyetracking Web Usability , 2010 .

[37]  Laura Chamberlain Eye Tracking Methodology; Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[38]  Mark Harrower,et al.  The Cognitive Limits of Animated Maps , 2007, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[39]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[40]  O. Mimura [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[41]  Laurent Goffart,et al.  Saccadic Eye Movements , 2009 .

[42]  Clarke Wilson,et al.  Activity patterns in space and time: calculating representative Hagerstrand trajectories , 2008 .

[43]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye movements in reading and information processing : , 2015 .

[44]  Theodore Steinke Eye Movement Studies In Cartography And Related Fields , 1987 .

[45]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Tomasz Opach,et al.  A New Concept of Multi-Scenario, Multi-Component Animated Maps for the Visualization of Spatio-Temporal Landscape Evolution , 2011 .

[48]  Badrul H. Khan Interface Design Issues , 2005 .

[49]  Thomas J. Cova,et al.  Exploratory Map Animation for Post-Event Analysis of Wildfire Protective Action Recommendations , 2006 .

[50]  Gennady Andrienko,et al.  Novel Method to Measure Inference Affordance in Static Small-Multiple Map Displays Representing Dynamic Processes , 2008 .

[51]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Cognitively Inspired and Perceptually Salient Graphic Displays for Efficient Spatial Inference Making , 2010 .

[52]  Tomasz Opach,et al.  EVALUATING THE USABILITY OF CARTOGRAPHIC ANIMATIONS WITH EYE-MOVEMENT ANALYSIS , 2011 .

[53]  J. Antes,et al.  The Effect of Experience on Reading Topographic Relief Information: Analyses of Performance and Eye Movements , 1985 .

[54]  M. Hegarty Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  Izabela Gołębiowska,et al.  Legend Layouts for Thematic Maps: A Case Study Integrating Usability Metrics with the Thinking Aloud Method , 2015 .

[56]  D. Simons,et al.  CHAPTER 13 – Change Blindness , 2005 .

[57]  Jason Dykes,et al.  vizLegends : Re-Imagining Map Legends with Visualization , 2010 .

[58]  Frank Hardisty GeoJabber: Enabling Geo-Collaborative Visual Analysis , 2009 .

[59]  R. Walker,et al.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[60]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  GeoVISTA studio: a codeless visual programming environment for geoscientific data analysis and visualization , 2002 .