Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR

Medical investigations targeting a quantitative analysis of the position emission tomography (PET) images require the incorporation of additional knowledge about the photon attenuation distribution in the patient. Today, energy range adapted attenuation maps derived from computer tomography (CT) scans are used to effectively compensate for image quality degrading effects, such as attenuation and scatter. Replacing CT by magnetic resonance (MR) is considered as the next evolutionary step in the field of hybrid imaging systems. However, unlike CT, MR does not measure the photon attenuation and thus does not provide an easy access to this valuable information. Hence, many research groups currently investigate different technologies for MR-based attenuation correction (MR-AC). Typically, these approaches are based on techniques such as special acquisition sequences (alone or in combination with subsequent image processing), anatomical atlas registration, or pattern recognition techniques using a data base of MR and corresponding CT images. We propose a generic iterative reconstruction approach to simultaneously estimate the local tracer concentration and the attenuation distribution using the segmented MR image as anatomical reference. Instead of applying predefined attenuation values to specific anatomical regions or tissue types, the gamma attenuation at 511 keV is determined from the PET emission data. In particular, our approach uses a maximum-likelihood estimation for the activity and a gradient-ascent based algorithm for the attenuation distribution. The adverse effects of scattered and accidental gamma coincidences on the quantitative accuracy of PET, as well as artifacts caused by the inherent crosstalk between activity and attenuation estimation are efficiently reduced using enhanced decay event localization provided by time-of-flight PET, accurate correction for accidental coincidences, and a reduced number of unknown attenuation coefficients. First results achieved with measured whole body PET data and reference segmentation from CT showed an absolute mean difference of 0.005 cm in the lungs, 0.0009 cm in case of fat, and 0.0015 cm for muscles and blood. The proposed method indicates a robust and reliable alternative to other MR-AC approaches targeting patient specific quantitative analysis in time-of-flight PET/MR.

[1]  C.C. Watson,et al.  Advances in scatter correction for 3D PET/CT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[2]  P. Marsden,et al.  A PET study of 18FDG uptake in soft tissue masses , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Emil Y. Sidky,et al.  Mathematical formulation of the potato peeler perspective , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[4]  Joel S Karp,et al.  Optimization of a fully 3D single scatter simulation algorithm for 3D PET. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  David Brasse,et al.  Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Implementation of a single scatter simulation algorithm for 3D PET: application to emission and transmission scanning , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[7]  Til Aach,et al.  Region-oriented 3-D segmentation of NMR datasets: a statistical model-based approach , 1990, Other Conferences.

[8]  Christoph Palm,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for torso-PET/MR imaging: pitfalls in mapping MR to CT data , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  C. Stearns,et al.  Random coincidence estimation from single event rates on the Discovery ST PET/CT scanner , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[10]  Rolf Clackdoyle,et al.  Attenuation correction in PET using consistency information , 1998 .

[11]  Matthias Hofmann,et al.  MR-Based PET Attenuation Correction: Method and Validation , 2007 .

[12]  R D Badawi,et al.  Randoms variance reduction in 3D PET. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Volker Dicken,et al.  A new approach towards simultaneous activity and attenuation reconstruction in emission tomography , 1999 .

[14]  Magnus Dahlbom,et al.  Performance analysis of an improved 3-D PET Monte Carlo simulation and scatter correction , 2000 .

[15]  James E. Bowsher,et al.  An EM algorithm for estimating SPECT emission and transmission parameters from emission data only , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  M. Desco,et al.  GPU acceleration of a fully 3D Iterative Reconstruction Software for PET using CUDA , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[19]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Debashish Pal,et al.  Attenuation correction for MR table and coils for a sequential PET/MR system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[21]  F. Natterer Computerized Tomography with Unknown Sources , 1983 .

[22]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  J. Karp,et al.  Systematic and Distributed Time-of-Flight List Mode PET Reconstruction , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[24]  J. Karp,et al.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  E.J. Hoffman,et al.  Evaluation of a Monte Carlo scatter correction in clinical 3D PET , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[26]  A. V. Bronnikov,et al.  Approximate reconstruction of attenuation map in SPECT imaging , 1995 .

[27]  G Glatting,et al.  Simultaneous iterative reconstruction for emission and attenuation images in positron emission tomography. , 2000, Medical physics.

[28]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Comparative evaluation of MR-based partial-volume correction schemes for PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  J. Hadamard Sur les problemes aux derive espartielles et leur signification physique , 1902 .

[30]  M. Dahlbom,et al.  Investigation of accelerated Monte Carlo techniques for PET simulation and 3-D PET scatter correction , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).