Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study

With increasing globalization and the proliferation of communication technologies, more people are working in cross-functional, geographically distributed teams. Although trust is clearly an important ingredient in these collaborations, little is known about the challenges this new work and social environment creates for the development of trust. Different disciplinary perspectives, different regional or national cultures, and the lack of face-to-face interaction when working at a distance raise significant barriers to developing trust between distant co-workers. We, therefore, posit that traditional models of trust need to be adapted to describe the development of trust between cross-functional, geographically distributed partners. To test our hypotheses, we conducted a longitudinal study of architecture, engineering and construction management students engaged in designing and planning a $5 million construction project in distributed teams. Our results suggest that cross-functional, geographically distributed workers may rely on early impressions of perceived trustworthiness when evaluating how their distant partners are delivering on commitments, because reliable information about actual follow-through is lacking or difficult to interpret. Consistent with this, we found that perceived trustworthiness, perceived follow-through and trust were relatively stable over time. We conclude that initial perceptions of trustworthiness are particularly important in cross-functional, geographically distributed work, although research is needed to draw comparisons with traditional work environments. # 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  George F. MacDonald,et al.  What Is Culture , 1991 .

[2]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[3]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[4]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  The Growth of Multidisciplinarity in the Cognitive Science Society , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[6]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[7]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  Reframing organizational culture , 1991 .

[8]  G. Fairholm Leadership and the Culture of Trust , 1994 .

[9]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[11]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work , 2002 .

[12]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Attribution in Distributed Work Groups , 2002 .

[13]  D. Maister Managing the Professional Service Firm , 1997 .

[14]  Motoki Watabe,et al.  Uncertainty, Trust, and Commitment Formation in the United States and Japan1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[16]  L. Strickland Surveillance and trust. , 1958, Journal of personality.

[17]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications , 1998 .

[18]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[20]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[21]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  A/E/C Teamwork: A Collaborative Design and Learning Space , 1999 .

[22]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work over the Centuries: Trust and Control in the Hudson's Bay Company, 1670–1826 , 2002 .

[23]  D. Good,et al.  Individuals, Interpersonal Relations, and Trust , 2000 .

[24]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[25]  L. Hosmer TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS , 1995 .

[26]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  The Structure of Optimal Trust: Moral and Strategic Implications , 1999 .

[27]  L. Toledo-Pereyra Trust , 2006, Mediation Behaviour.

[28]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Face-to-Face: Making Network Organizations Work , 1992 .

[29]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[30]  John K. Butler Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory , 1991 .

[31]  David M. Messick,et al.  Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics. , 1998 .

[32]  J. Mccroskey Scales for the measurement of ethos , 1966 .

[33]  Aneil Mishra ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO CRISIS: THE CENTRALITY OF TRUST , 1996 .

[34]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[35]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[36]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  Managing integration and coordination in cross‐functional teams: an international study of Concurrent Engineering product development , 1999 .

[37]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[38]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Globalwork : bridging distance, culture, and time , 1994 .

[39]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  Social networks and trust , 1999 .

[40]  Suzanne K. Bishop Cross-Functional Project Teams in Functionally Aligned Organizations , 1999 .

[41]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones , 1999 .

[42]  L. Strickland Surveillance and trust1 , 1958 .

[43]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  S. Shapiro The Social Control of Impersonal Trust , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  C. Ireson,et al.  A multidisciplinary shared governance model. , 1998, Nursing management.

[46]  D. H. Mills The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[47]  K D Ryan,et al.  Driving fear out of the medication-use process so that improvement can occur. , 1999, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[48]  Mark Casson,et al.  Groupware adoption in a distributed organization: transporting and transforming technology through social worlds , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[49]  A. Hollingshead Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[50]  John K. Butler,et al.  A Behavioral Decision Theory Approach to Modeling Dyadic Trust in Superiors and Subordinates , 1984 .

[51]  D. Collard,et al.  Trust : making and breaking cooperative relations , 1989 .

[52]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[53]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Task Requirements and Media Choice in Collaborative Writing , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[54]  Guido Möllering Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures , 2003 .

[55]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. , 1971 .

[56]  Gregory A. Bigley,et al.  Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust , 1998 .

[57]  James H. Liu,et al.  Distance Matters: Physical Space and Social Impact , 1995 .

[58]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[59]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[60]  K. Dirks The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  L. Hamilton 217-249 inRegression with Graphics: A Second Course in Applied Statistics , 1991 .

[62]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust , 1993 .

[63]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[64]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[65]  Diego Gambetta Trust : making and breaking cooperative relations , 1992 .

[66]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. , 1996 .

[67]  Murray D. Smith,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications , 1996 .

[68]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Building collaborative cross-functional new product teams , 1999 .

[69]  Yasushi Nitta,et al.  A New Method to Check the Surface of Road Construction Work by using IT Thchnology , 2004 .

[70]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Building Trust in Cross-Cultural Collaborations: Toward a Contingency Perspective: , 2002 .

[71]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[72]  Rajeev R. Bhattacharya,et al.  A Formal Model of Trust Based on Outcomes , 1998 .

[73]  H. Tajfel Cognitive aspects of prejudice , 1969, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[74]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[75]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[76]  John C. Parker,et al.  “This culture” , 1940, Electrical Engineering.

[77]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan , 1994 .