The Earthquake Potential of the New Madrid Seismic Zone

The fault system responsible for New Madrid seismicity has generated temporally clustered very large earthquakes in A.D. 900 100 years and A.D. 1450 150 years as well as in 1811-1812. Given the uncertainties in dating liquefaction features, the time between the past three New Madrid events may be as short as 200 years and as long as 800 years, with an average of 500 years. This advance in understanding the Late Holocene history of the New Madrid seismic zone and thus, the contemporary tectonic behavior of the associated fault system was made through studies of hundreds of earthquake-induced liquefaction features at more than 250 sites across the New Madrid region. We have found evidence that prehistoric sand blows, like those that formed during the 1811-1812 earthquakes, are probably com- pound structures resulting from multiple earthquakes closely clustered in time or earthquake sequences. From the spatial distribution and size of sand blows and their sedimentary units, we infer the source zones and estimate the magnitudes of earth- quakes within each sequence and thereby characterize the detailed behavior of the fault system. It appears that fault rupture was complex and that the central branch of the seismic zone produced very large earthquakes during the A.D. 900 and A.D. 1450 events as well as in 1811-1812. On the basis of a minimum recurrence rate of 200 years, we are now entering the period during which the next 1811-1812-type event could occur.

[1]  A. Broughton,et al.  Liquefaction susceptibility mapping in the city of Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee , 2001 .

[2]  S. F. Obermeier,et al.  The New Madrid earthquakes : an engineering-geologic interpretation of relict liquefaction features , 1989 .

[3]  E. Fielding,et al.  The 26 January 2001 “Republic Day” Earthquake, India , 2001 .

[4]  K. Kelson,et al.  Multiple late Holocene earthquakes along the Reelfoot fault, central New Madrid seismic zone , 1996 .

[5]  Roger T. Saucier,et al.  Evidence for episodic sand-blow activity during the 1811-1812 New Madrid (Missouri) earthquake series , 1989 .

[6]  N. Ambraseys.  Engineering seismology: Part II , 1988 .

[7]  A. Johnston.  Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions—III. New Madrid 1811–1812, Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755 , 1996 .

[8]  S. Hough,et al.  On the Modified Mercalli intensities and magnitudes of the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes , 2000 .

[9]  Arch C. Johnston,et al.  Recurrence rates and probability estimates for the New Madrid Seismic Zone , 1985 .

[10]  A. Johnston.  The Seismicity of ‘Stable Continental Interiors’ , 1989 .

[11]  J. C. Savage.  Criticism of some forecasts of the national earthquake prediction evaluation council , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  M. Tuttle.  The use of liquefaction features in paleoseismology: Lessons learned in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States , 2001 .

[13]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  A high-frequency magnitude scale , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  Eugene S. Schweig,et al.  THE -ENIGMA OF THE NEW MADRID EARTHQUAKES OF 1811-1812 , 1996 .

[15]  R. Saucier.  Geoarchaeological evidence of strong prehistoric earthquakes in the New Madrid (Missouri) seismic zone , 1991 .

[16]  M. Ellis,et al.  Reconciling Short Recurrence Intervals with Minor Deformation in the New Madrid Seismic Zone , 1994, Science.

[17]  Myron Leslie Fuller,et al.  The New Madrid Earthquake , 1992 .

[18]  Robert F. Cande,et al.  Use of archaeology to date liquefaction features and seismic events in the new madrid seismic zone, Central United States , 1996 .

[19]  J. Sims,et al.  Recurrent liquefaction induced by the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake and 1990 and 1991 aftershocks: Implications for paleoseismicity studies , 1995 .

[20]  M. Tuttle,et al.  Archeological and pedological evidence for large prehistoric earthquakes in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States , 1995 .

[21]  Robert H. Lafferty,et al.  New evidence for a large earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone between A.D. 1400 and 1670 , 1999 .

[22]  Chris H. Cramer,et al.  A seismic hazard uncertainty analysis for the New Madrid seismic zone , 2001 .

[23]  Newman,et al.  Slow deformation and lower seismic hazard at the new madrid seismic zone , 1999, Science.

[24]  Arch C. Johnston,et al.  Earthquakes in stable continental crust , 1990 .

[25]  Michael A. Ellis,et al.  Evidence for Large Prehistoric Earthquakes in the Northern New Madrid Seismic Zone, Central United States , 1998 .