Organizational Divisions in BIM-Enabled Commercial Construction

Proponents claim that the adoption of building information modeling BIM will lead to greater efficiencies through increased collaboration. In this paper, we present research that examines the use of BIM technologies for mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire life safety systems often referred to as MEP coordination and how the introduction of BIM influences collaboration and communication. Using data from over 12 months of ethnographic observations of the MEP coordination process for two commercial construction projects and interviews with 65 industry leaders across the United States, we find that BIM-enabled projects are often tightly coupled technologi- cally, but divided organizationally. This means that while BIM makes visible the connections among project members, it is not fostering closer collaboration across different companies. We outline the competing obligations to scope, project, and company as one cause for this division. Obligations to an individual scope of work or to a particular company can conflict with project goals. Individual leadership, especially that of the MEP coordinator in the teams we studied, often substitutes for stronger project cohesion and organization. Organi- zational forces and structures must be accounted for in order for BIM to be implemented successfully.

[1]  Beth A. Bechky.  Object Lessons: Workplace Artifacts as Representations of Occupational Jurisdiction1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Geoffrey A. Moore.  Crossing the chasm : marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers , 1999 .

[3]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[4]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Antecedents of Successful Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Design Implementation in Design and Construction Networks , 2007 .

[5]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Visualizing Knowledge in Project-Based Work , 2008 .

[6]  William J. O'Brien.  IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES IN PROJECT WEB SITES: A PRACTIONER'S VIEWPOINT , 2000 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[8]  D. Cuff.  Architecture: The Story of Practice , 1992 .

[9]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  An experimental study of computer mediated collaborative design , 1996, Proceedings of WET ICE '96. IEEE 5th Workshop on Enabling Technologies; Infrastucture for Collaborative Enterprises.

[10]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[11]  Panagiotis Mitropoulos,et al.  Forces driving adoption of new information technologies , 2000 .

[12]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Displays in the Wild: Understanding the Dynamics and Evolution of a Display Ecology , 2006, Pervasive.

[13]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Success/Failure Factors and Performance Measures of Web-Based Construction Project Management Systems: Professionals’ Viewpoint , 2006 .

[14]  Spiro N. Pollalis,et al.  Promise and Barriers to Technology Enabled and Open Project Team Collaboration , 2005 .

[15]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[16]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Cifecenter for Integrated Facility Engineering Can You Accelerate Your Project Using Extreme Collaboration? a Model Based Analysis Can You Accelerate Your Project Using Extreme Collaboration? a Model Based Analysis , 2022 .

[17]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Organizing to Increase Innovation in Construction Firms , 1989 .