Effect of color visualization and display hardware on the visual assessment of pseudocolor medical images.

PURPOSE Even though the use of color in the interpretation of medical images has increased significantly in recent years, the ad hoc manner in which color is handled and the lack of standard approaches have been associated with suboptimal and inconsistent diagnostic decisions with a negative impact on patient treatment and prognosis. The purpose of this study is to determine if the choice of color scale and display device hardware affects the visual assessment of patterns that have the characteristics of functional medical images. METHODS Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the basis for designing and performing experiments. Synthetic images resembling brain dynamic-contrast enhanced MRI consisting of scaled mixtures of white, lumpy, and clustered backgrounds were used to assess the performance of a rainbow ("jet"), a heated black-body ("hot"), and a gray ("gray") color scale with display devices of different quality on the detection of small changes in color intensity. The authors used a two-alternative, forced-choice design where readers were presented with 600 pairs of images. Each pair consisted of two images of the same pattern flipped along the vertical axis with a small difference in intensity. Readers were asked to select the image with the highest intensity. Three differences in intensity were tested on four display devices: a medical-grade three-million-pixel display, a consumer-grade monitor, a tablet device, and a phone. RESULTS The estimates of percent correct show that jet outperformed hot and gray in the high and low range of the color scales for all devices with a maximum difference in performance of 18% (confidence intervals: 6%, 30%). Performance with hot was different for high and low intensity, comparable to jet for the high range, and worse than gray for lower intensity values. Similar performance was seen between devices using jet and hot, while gray performance was better for handheld devices. Time of performance was shorter with jet. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that the choice of color scale and display hardware affects the visual comparative analysis of pseudocolor images. Follow-up studies in clinical settings are being considered to confirm the results with patient images.

[1]  Jasjit S Suri,et al.  Carotid artery dissection on non-contrast CT: does color improve the diagnostic confidence? , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Image browsing in slow medical liquid crystal displays. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[3]  Evis Sala,et al.  Advanced ovarian cancer: multiparametric MR imaging demonstrates response- and metastasis-specific effects. , 2012, Radiology.

[4]  David Borland,et al.  Rainbow Color Map (Still) Considered Harmful , 2007 .

[5]  Luke Macyszyn,et al.  Pattern analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging demonstrates peritumoral tissue heterogeneity. , 2014, Radiology.

[6]  Pierre-Edouard Sottas,et al.  Mammographic texture synthesis: second-generation clustered lumpy backgrounds using a genetic algorithm. , 2008, Optics express.

[7]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  15.2: Distinguished Paper: Assessment of Temporal Blur‐Reduction Methods Using a Computational Observer that Predicts Human Performance , 2007 .

[8]  Joon Koo Han,et al.  Solid pancreatic lesions: characterization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment--a preliminary study. , 2013, Radiology.

[9]  Aldo Badano Effect of slow display on detectability when browsing large image datasets , 2009 .

[10]  S. Pizer,et al.  Color display in ultrasonography. , 1983, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Hong Li,et al.  Evaluation of signal detection performance with pseudocolor display and lumpy backgrounds , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Mike Tilkin,et al.  ACR white paper on teleradiology practice: a report from the Task Force on Teleradiology Practice. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[13]  Bernice E. Rogowitz,et al.  Data visualization: the end of the rainbow , 1998 .

[14]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  Color Appearance Models: Fairchild/Color Appearance Models , 2013 .

[15]  Wei Huang,et al.  Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[16]  Bhargav Raman,et al.  Radiology on handheld devices: image display, manipulation, and PACS integration issues. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Visual methods for determining ambient illumination conditions when viewing medical images in mobile display devices , 2012 .

[18]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[19]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Reducing the number of reader interpretations in MRMC studies. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[20]  Hyun Goo Kang,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment , 2014, Journal of stroke.

[21]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: An update on state‐of‐the‐art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Dean Farnsworth,et al.  The Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue and Dichotomous Tests for Color Vision* , 1943 .

[23]  Ewelina Kluza,et al.  Can perfusion MRI predict response to preoperative treatment in rectal cancer? , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  Peter Liu,et al.  The Effect of Ambient Illumination on Handheld Display Image Quality , 2014, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[25]  Brandon D Gallas,et al.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[26]  J. T. Murchison,et al.  Radiology smartphone applications; current provision and cautions , 2013, Insights into Imaging.

[27]  Wei-Chung Cheng,et al.  30.3: Comparison of On‐Screen Display‐based and ICC Profile‐based Calibration for OLED Displays , 2013 .

[28]  L. Pantanowitz Digital images and the future of digital pathology , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[29]  David Borland,et al.  Collaboration-Specific Color-Map Design , 2011, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[30]  Tomoe Barr,et al.  Automated breast segmentation of fat and water MR images using dynamic programming. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[31]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Human Factors and Human-Computer Considerations in Teleradiology and Telepathology , 2014, Healthcare.

[32]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Noise in flat-panel displays with subpixel structure. , 2004, Medical physics.

[33]  Seth J Berkowitz,et al.  Resident iPad use: has it really changed the game? , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[34]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Impact of digital image manipulation in cytology. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[35]  L. Costaridou,et al.  Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[36]  Louis D. Silverstein,et al.  Observer Performance Using Virtual Pathology Slides: Impact of LCD Color Reproduction Accuracy , 2012, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[37]  Mark F McEntee,et al.  Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  Gilles Chatellier,et al.  Metastatic renal carcinoma: evaluation of antiangiogenic therapy with dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. , 2010, Radiology.

[39]  Wei-Chung Cheng,et al.  Consistency and Standardization of Color in Medical Imaging: a Consensus Report , 2014, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[40]  Chaya S Moskowitz,et al.  Multiparametric prostate MR imaging with T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences: are all pulse sequences necessary to detect locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy? , 2013, Radiology.

[41]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[42]  Daniel P Barboriak,et al.  Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MR imaging for brain tumor characterization and assessment of treatment response. , 2006, Radiology.

[43]  Soonmee Cha,et al.  Benefits of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI for glioma diagnosis and therapy. , 2014, CNS oncology.

[44]  L H Schwamm,et al.  Combining MRI with NIHSS Thresholds to Predict Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Value for Patient Selection , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[45]  Wei-Chung Cheng,et al.  Spatial resolution and noise in organic light-emitting diode displays for medical imaging applications. , 2013, Optics express.

[46]  Wei-Chung Cheng,et al.  Evaluating Color Shift in Liquid Crystal Displays with the Primary Stability Metrics , 2013, Color Imaging Conference.