Publication boost in web of science journals and its effect on citation distributions

In this article, we show that the dramatic increase in the number of research articles indexed in the Web of Science database impacts the commonly observed distributions of citations within these articles. First, we document that the growing number of physics articles in recent years is attributed to existing journals publishing more and more articles rather than more new journals coming into being as it happens in computer science. Second, even though the references from the more recent articles generally cover a longer time span, the newer articles are cited more frequently than the older ones if the uneven article growth is not corrected for. Nevertheless, despite this change in the distribution of citations, the citation behavior of scientists does not seem to have changed.

[1]  Cliff Chiung-Yu Lin,et al.  On the Shoulders of Giants: The Growing Impact of Older Articles , 2014, ArXiv.

[2]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Rescaling citations of publications in Physics , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Ranking scientific publications using a model of network traffic , 2006, ArXiv.

[4]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[5]  Qing Ke,et al.  Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Leo Egghe,et al.  A model showing the increase in time of the average and median reference age and the decrease in time of the Price Index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[7]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[8]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[10]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[11]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  The growth of science and database coverage , 2012, Scientometrics.

[13]  Steve Pressé,et al.  Nonuniversal power law scaling in the probability distribution of scientific citations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Characterizing and Modeling Citation Dynamics , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Prediction of highly cited papers , 2013, ArXiv.

[16]  L. Christophorou.  Science , 2018, Emerging Dynamics: Science, Energy, Society and Values.

[17]  Huan Liu,et al.  Topic taxonomy adaptation for group profiling , 2008, TKDD.

[18]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters , 2006, TKDD.