Looking at Faces: First-Order and Second-Order Features as Determinants of Facial Appearance

The encoding and relative importance of first-order (discrete) and second-order (configural) features in mental representations of unfamiliar faces have been investigated. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (KYST) was carried out on similarity judgments of forty-one photographs of faces (homogeneous with respect to sex, race, facial expression, and, to a lesser extent, age). A large set of ratings, measurements, and ratios of measurements of the faces was regressed against the three-dimensional KYST solution in order to determine the first-order and second-order features used to judge similarity. Parameters characterizing both first-order and second-order features emerged as important determinants of facial similarity. First-order feature parameters characterizing the appearance of the eyes, eyebrows, and mouth, and second-order feature parameters characterizing the position of the eyes, spatial relations between the internal features, and chin shape correlated with the dimensions of the KYST solution. There was little difference in the extent to which first-order and second-order features were encoded. Two higher-level parameters, age and weight, were also used to judge similarity. The implications of these results for mental representations of faces are discussed.

[1]  T. Howells A study of ability to recognize faces. , 1938 .

[2]  R. Shepard The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[3]  R. Shepard The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. , 1962 .

[4]  J. Kruskal Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[5]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[6]  [Dimensions and recognition of facial expression]. , 1967, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie.

[7]  Recognition of body surface regions. , 1969, Genetic psychology monographs.

[8]  K. Laughery,et al.  Recognition of human faces: effects of target exposure time, target position, pose position, and type of photograph. , 1971, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  L. D. Harmon The recognition of faces. , 1973, Scientific American.

[10]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[11]  N. Hirschberg,et al.  What's in a face: Individual differences in face perception☆ , 1978 .

[12]  James T. Milord Aesthetic aspects of faces : A (somewhat) phenomenological analysis using multidimensional scaling methods , 1978 .

[13]  A. Young,et al.  Absence of Any Developmental Trend in Right Hemisphere Superiority for Face Recognition , 1980, Cortex.

[14]  R N Shepard,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.

[15]  E Winograd,et al.  Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[16]  A. Young,et al.  Accuracy of Naming Laterally Presented Known Faces by Children and Adults , 1981, Cortex.

[17]  Races and faces — a comparison of the responses of Africans and Europeans to faces of the same and different races , 1981 .

[18]  Harold A. Sackeim,et al.  Asymmetry of the Face at Rest: Size, Area and Emotional Expression , 1984, Cortex.

[19]  J Sergent,et al.  Configural processing of faces in the left and the right cerebral hemispheres. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  N. Etcoff Perceptual and conceptual organization of facial emotions: Hemispheric differences , 1984, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[22]  T. Inui,et al.  The Effect of Changes in Visible Area on Facial Recognition , 1984, Perception.

[23]  G. Rhodes Lateralized processes in face recognition. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[24]  J Sergent Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  The User's Guide to Multidimensional Scaling , 1985 .

[26]  R. Flin,et al.  Development of face recognition: an encoding switch? , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[27]  N D Haig,et al.  How Faces Differ—A New Comparative Technique , 1985, Perception.

[28]  J. Sergent Microgenesis of Face Perception , 1986 .

[29]  N. Haig Exploring Recognition with Interchanged Facial Features , 1986, Perception.

[30]  N D Haig,et al.  High-Resolution Facial Feature Saliency Mapping , 1986, Perception.

[31]  G. Rhodes Memory for lateral asymmetries in well-known faces: Evidence for configural information in memory representations of Faces , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[32]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.