On the hypothesis that grammars are mentally represented

[1]  P. BRATLEY,et al.  Recognition of Syntactic Structure by Computer , 1967, Nature.

[2]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Speech recognition: A model and a program for research , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  H. Shulman,et al.  Control properties of semantic coding in a lexical decision task , 1977 .

[4]  J. Jonides,et al.  A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit , 1972 .

[5]  T. Carr,et al.  Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  J. Searle.  Rules and causation , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Rules and representations , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Issues in the foundations of cognitive psychology , 1981 .

[9]  R. Schank,et al.  Response to Dresher and Hornstein , 1977, Cognition.

[10]  Christopher S. Hill,et al.  Mechanism, Mentalism and Metamathematics , 1980 .

[11]  H. Hawkins,et al.  Flexible coding in word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  J. Fodor.  Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  Robert D. Tennent,et al.  The denotational semantics of programming languages , 1976, CACM.

[14]  John Macnamara,et al.  Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch , 1971 .

[15]  Robert A. Kowalski,et al.  The Semantics of Predicate Logic as a Programming Language , 1976, JACM.

[16]  F. Crick.  Thinking about the brain. , 1979, Scientific American.

[17]  Psychological Aspects of the Theory of Syntax , 1967 .

[18]  J. Fodor,et al.  How direct is visual perception?: Some reflections on Gibson's “ecological approach” , 1981, Cognition.

[19]  T. Poggio,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[20]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. , 1979 .

[21]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Tree Adjunct Grammars , 1975, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[22]  David H. D. Warren,et al.  Definite Clause Grammars for Language Analysis - A Survey of the Formalism and a Comparison with Augmented Transition Networks , 1980, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Walter Dandy,et al.  The Brain , 1966 .

[24]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  Locality principles and the acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1982 .

[25]  Michael J. Fischer,et al.  Relations Among Complexity Measures , 1979, JACM.

[26]  S. Ullman.  Against direct perception , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  David Marr,et al.  Visual Information Processing: The Structure and Creation of Visual Representations , 1980 .

[28]  Martin Davis.  What is a Computation , 1978 .

[29]  S. Pinker,et al.  Direct vs. representational views of cognition: A parallel between vision and phonology , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  D. Swinney,et al.  Lexical Processing during Sentence Comprehension: Effects of Higher Order Constraints and Implications for Representation , 1981 .

[31]  W. Lycan.  Form, Function, and Feel , 1981 .

[32]  W E Grimson,et al.  A computer implementation of a theory of human stereo vision. , 1981, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[34]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Computation and cognition: issues in the foundations of cognitive science , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  R. Berwick,et al.  The role of grammars in models of language use , 1983, Cognition.