Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of Monaural FDSI Beamforming Algorithm using a KEMAR Mannequin

Abstract: To enhance the speech perception of hearing aid users in noisy environment, most hearing aid devicesadopt various beamforming algorithms such as the first-order differential microphone (DM1) and the two-stage direc-tional microphone (DM2) algorithms that maintain sounds from the direction of the interlocutor and reduce the ambi-ent sounds from the other directions. However, these conventional algorithms represent poor directionality abilityin low frequency area. Therefore, to enhance the speech perception of hearing aid uses in low frequency range, ourgroup had suggested a fractional delay subtraction and integration (FDSI) algorithm and estimated its theoretical per-formance using computer simulation in previous article. In this study, we performed a KEMAR test in non-rever-berant room that compares the performance of DM1, DM2, broadband beamforming (BBF), and proposed FDSIalgorithms using several objective indices such as a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement, a segmental SNR (seg-SNR) improvement, a perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), and an Itakura-Saito measure (IS). Experi-mental results showed that the performance of the FDSI algorithm was −3.26-7.16 dB in SNR improvement, −1.94-5.41 dB in segSNR improvement, 1.49-2.79 in PESQ, and 0.79-3.59 in IS, which demonstrated that the FDSI algo-rithm showed the highest improvement of SNR and segSNR, and the lowest IS. We believe that the proposed FDSIalgorithm has a potential as a beamformer for digital hearing aid devices.Key words: hearing aids, directional microphone, beamforming

[1]  Todd A. Ricketts How fitting, patient, and environmental factors affect directional benefit , 2003 .

[2]  Jun Yang,et al.  Adaptive Null-Forming Scheme in , 2002 .

[3]  Gary W. Elko,et al.  A simple adaptive first-order differential microphone , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Accoustics.

[4]  IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.

[5]  W Soede,et al.  Assessment of a directional microphone array for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[7]  James M. Kates,et al.  Digital hearing aids. , 2008, Harvard health letter.

[8]  Norbert Dillier,et al.  Sound Classification in Hearing Aids Inspired by Auditory Scene Analysis , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[9]  Fa-Long Luo,et al.  Adaptive null-forming scheme in digital hearing aids , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Design of broadband beamformers robust against gain and phase errors in the microphone array characteristics , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  Walter Kellermann,et al.  Design of robust superdirective beamformers as a convex optimization problem , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[12]  Paula P. Henry,et al.  Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid: Evaluación de un auxiliar auditivo de micrófono direccional adaptable , 2002, International journal of audiology.