Advances in autothermal reformer design

Abstract Together with the high-temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell, the reactor for the autothermal reforming (ATR) of liquid hydrocarbons, such as diesel fuel or kerosene, is the key component of the Julich fuel cell system in the 5 kWe power class. This paper presents some of Julich’s most recent development in the field of ATR reactors, specifically the ATR 12. ATR 12 is characterized by a new concept for the internal generation of superheated steam as one of the ATR reactants using concentric shells instead of coiled tubing and particularly by the integration of an electric heating wire to enable fast and autonomous start-up. Three different experimental procedures for heating up the ATR 12 are presented and discussed, the most suitable of which enables the start-up of the ATR 12 within approximately 15 min. As a consequence, from the system perspective, the bulky start-up burner, which is also difficult to control, along with the corresponding heat exchanger unit, can be dispensed with. Additionally, comprehensive steady-state experiments identify suitable reaction conditions for the operation of the ATR 12.

[1]  Enrique Iglesia,et al.  Structural requirements and reaction pathways in methane activation and chemical conversion catalyzed by rhodium , 2004 .

[2]  F. Solymosi,et al.  Activation of CH4 and Its Reaction with CO2 over Supported Rh Catalysts , 1993 .

[3]  Sang-Hyeon Ha,et al.  Development of a thermally self-sustaining kWe-class diesel reformer using hydrogen peroxide for hydrogen production in low-oxygen environments , 2016 .

[4]  D. Creaser,et al.  Hydrogen generation from n-tetradecane, low-sulfur and Fischer-Tropsch diesel over Rh supported on alumina doped with ceria/lanthana , 2011 .

[5]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Optimised Mixture Formation for Diesel Fuel Processing , 2008 .

[6]  M. Harada,et al.  Hydrogen production by autothermal reforming of kerosene over MgAlOx-supported Rh catalysts , 2009 .

[7]  Kaimin Li,et al.  Energy-efficient biogas reforming process to produce syngas: the enhanced methane conversion by O2 , 2017 .

[8]  Peiwen Li,et al.  Fuel adaptability study of a lab-scale 2.5 kWth autothermal reformer , 2015 .

[9]  W. Kiatkittipong,et al.  Partial oxidation of palm fatty acids over Ce‐ZrO2: Roles of catalyst surface area, lattice oxygen capacity and mobility , 2011 .

[10]  L. Hong,et al.  Nickel phosphide catalyst for autothermal reforming of surrogate gasoline fuel , 2011 .

[11]  Joongmyeon Bae,et al.  Performance comparison of autothermal reforming for liquid hydrocarbons, gasoline and diesel for fuel cell applications , 2006 .

[12]  Soo Chool Lee,et al.  Study of sulfur-resistant Ni–Al-based catalysts for autothermal reforming of dodecane , 2015 .

[13]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Evaluation of Co, La, and Mn promoted Rh catalysts for autothermal reforming of commercial diesel : Aging and characterization , 2015 .

[14]  I. Hermann,et al.  Autothermal reforming of gasoline using a cool flame vaporizer , 2004 .

[15]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Evaluation of Co, La, and Mn promoted Rh catalysts for autothermal reforming of commercial diesel , 2014 .

[16]  L. Hong,et al.  Ni/Ce1−xMx catalyst generated from metallo-organic network for autothermal reforming of diesel surrogate , 2013 .

[17]  R. Farrauto,et al.  Steam reforming of sulfur-containing dodecane on a Rh-Pt catalyst: Influence of process parameters on catalyst stability and coke structure , 2014 .

[18]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Autothermal reforming of Fischer–Tropsch diesel over alumina and ceria–zirconia supported catalysts , 2013 .

[19]  R. C. Samsun,et al.  Fuel Processing of Diesel and Kerosene for Auxiliary Power Unit Applications , 2013 .

[20]  K. Hbaieb.  Exploring strontium titanate as a reforming catalyst for dodecane , 2016, Applied Nanoscience.

[21]  Joachim Pasel,et al.  Catalytic burner with internal steam generation for a fuel-cell-based auxiliary power unit for middle distillates , 2014 .

[22]  Theodore R. Krause,et al.  Effect of temperature, steam-to-carbon ratio, and alkali metal additives on improving the sulfur tolerance of a Rh/La–Al2O3 catalyst reforming gasoline for fuel cell applications , 2008 .

[23]  W. Maier,et al.  CO2-Reforming of Methane on Supported Rh and Ir Catalysts , 1996 .

[24]  L. Hong,et al.  Ceria-supported nickel borate as a sulfur-tolerant catalyst for autothermal reforming of a proxy jet fuel , 2016 .

[25]  A. Krause,et al.  Autothermal reforming of simulated gasoline and diesel fuels , 2006 .

[26]  J. Schwank,et al.  Effect of metal particle size on sulfur tolerance of Ni catalysts during autothermal reforming of isooctane , 2011 .

[27]  Klas Engvall,et al.  Promoted RhPt bimetallic catalyst supported on δ-Al2O3 and CeO2–ZrO2 during full-scale autothermal reforming for automotive applications: Post-mortem characterization , 2015 .

[28]  A. Gupta,et al.  Recent advances in catalytic oxidation and reformation of jet fuels , 2016 .

[29]  J. Bae,et al.  Liquid fuel processing for hydrogen production: A review , 2016 .

[30]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Long-term stability at fuel processing of diesel and kerosene , 2014 .

[31]  Tiejun Wang,et al.  Auto-thermal reforming of biomass raw fuel gas to syngas in a novel reformer: Promotion of hot-electron , 2013 .

[32]  Chanmin Lee,et al.  Autothermal reforming of heavy-hydrocarbon fuels by morphology controlled perovskite catalysts using carbon templates , 2017 .

[33]  J. Bae,et al.  Diesel autothermal reforming with hydrogen peroxide for low-oxygen environments , 2015 .

[34]  R. C. Samsun,et al.  Autothermal reforming of commercial Jet A-1 on a 5kWe scale , 2007 .

[35]  S. Katikaneni,et al.  Ni–Me/Ce0.9Gd0.1O2−x (Me: Rh, Pt and Ru) catalysts for diesel pre-reforming , 2015 .

[36]  Sangho Yoon,et al.  Suppression of ethylene-induced carbon deposition in diesel autothermal reforming , 2009 .

[37]  Sangho Yoon,et al.  Effects of ethylene on carbon formation in diesel autothermal reforming , 2008 .

[38]  Remzi Can Samsun,et al.  Evaluation of multifunctional fuel cell systems in aviation using a multistep process analysis methodology , 2013 .

[39]  Janko Petrovčič,et al.  Impact of fuel cell and battery size to overall system performance – A diesel fuel-cell APU case study , 2016 .

[40]  Brandon R. Walker,et al.  Autothermal reforming and partial oxidation of n-hexadecane via Pt/Ni bimetallic catalysts on ceria-based supports , 2015 .

[41]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Assessing the adaptability to varying fuel supply of an autothermal reformer , 2008 .

[42]  M. Walluk,et al.  Bio-fuel reformation for solid oxide fuel cell applications. Part 3: Biodiesel–diesel blends , 2014 .

[43]  Anthony M. Dean,et al.  The impact of fuel evaporation on the gas-phase kinetics in the mixing region of a diesel autothermal reformer , 2015 .

[44]  Michael G. Waller,et al.  Diesel auto-thermal reforming for solid oxide fuel cell systems: Anode off-gas recycle simulation , 2014 .

[45]  Peiwen Li,et al.  Small-scale reforming of diesel and jet fuels to make hydrogen and syngas for fuel cells: A review , 2013 .

[46]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  A novel reactor type for autothermal reforming of diesel fuel and kerosene , 2015 .

[47]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Autothermal reforming of low-sulfur diesel over bimetallic RhPt supported on Al2O3, CeO2–ZrO2, SiO2 and TiO2 , 2011 .

[48]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Fuel cell systems with reforming of petroleum-based and synthetic-based diesel and kerosene fuels for APU applications , 2015 .

[49]  M. Walluk,et al.  Bio-fuel reforming for solid oxide fuel cell applications. Part 2: Biodiesel , 2014 .

[50]  Werner Lehnert,et al.  Design and test of a 5kWe high-temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell system operated with diesel and kerosene , 2014 .

[51]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Elimination of by-products of autothermal diesel reforming , 2016 .

[52]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Full-scale autothermal reforming for transport applications: The effect of diesel fuel quality , 2013 .

[53]  Shuyang Zhang,et al.  Parametric analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell auxiliary power unit operating on syngas produced by autothermal reforming of hydrocarbon fuels , 2016 .

[54]  Antje Wörner,et al.  Direct steam reforming of diesel and diesel–biodiesel blends for distributed hydrogen generation , 2015 .

[55]  Theodore R. Krause,et al.  Role of the oxide support on the performance of Rh catalysts for the autothermal reforming of gasoline and gasoline surrogates to hydrogen , 2006 .

[56]  M. Walluk,et al.  Bio-fuel reformation for solid oxide fuel cell applications. Part 1: Fuel vaporization and reactant mixing , 2013 .

[57]  J. Bae,et al.  Autothermal reforming study of diesel for fuel cell application , 2006 .

[58]  A. Outi I. Krause,et al.  Autothermal reforming of simulated and commercial diesel: The performance of zirconia-supported RhPt catalyst in the presence of sulfur , 2008 .

[59]  J. Pasel,et al.  Routes for deactivation of different autothermal reforming catalysts , 2016 .

[60]  Vito Specchia,et al.  Performance evaluation and comparison of fuel processors integrated with PEM fuel cell based on steam or autothermal reforming and on CO preferential oxidation or selective methanation , 2015 .