Uncovering the genomic heterogeneity of multifocal breast cancer

Multifocal breast cancer (MFBC), defined as multiple synchronous unilateral lesions of invasive breast cancer, is relatively frequent and has been associated with more aggressive features than unifocal cancer. Here, we aimed to investigate the genomic heterogeneity between MFBC lesions sharing similar histopathological parameters. Characterization of different lesions from 36 patients with ductal MFBC involved the identification of non‐silent coding mutations in 360 protein‐coding genes (171 tumour and 36 matched normal samples). We selected only patients with lesions presenting the same grade, ER, and HER2 status. Mutations were classified as ‘oncogenic’ in the case of recurrent substitutions reported in COSMIC or truncating mutations affecting tumour suppressor genes. All mutations identified in a given patient were further interrogated in all samples from that patient through deep resequencing using an orthogonal platform. Whole‐genome rearrangement screen was further conducted in 8/36 patients. Twenty‐four patients (67%) had substitutions/indels shared by all their lesions, of which 11 carried the same mutations in all lesions, and 13 had lesions with both common and private mutations. Three‐quarters of those 24 patients shared oncogenic variants. The remaining 12 patients (33%) did not share any substitution/indels, with inter‐lesion heterogeneity observed for oncogenic mutation(s) in genes such as PIK3CA, TP53, GATA3, and PTEN. Genomically heterogeneous lesions tended to be further apart in the mammary gland than homogeneous lesions. Genome‐wide analyses of a limited number of patients identified a common somatic background in all studied MFBCs, including those with no mutation in common between the lesions. To conclude, as the number of molecular targeted therapies increases and trials driven by genomic screening are ongoing, our findings highlight the presence of genomic inter‐lesion heterogeneity in one‐third, despite similar pathological features. This implies that deeper molecular characterization of all MFBC lesions is warranted for the adequate management of those cancers. © 2015 The Authors. Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

[1]  D. Amadori,et al.  Abstract CT135: Uncovering the genomic heterogeneity of multifocal breast cancer , 2015 .

[2]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Evolving paradigms in multifocal breast cancer. , 2015, Seminars in cancer biology.

[3]  Pieter Wesseling,et al.  DNA copy number analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed specimens by shallow whole-genome sequencing with identification and exclusion of problematic regions in the genome assembly , 2014, Genome research.

[4]  C Sotiriou,et al.  The AURORA initiative for metastatic breast cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  Gabor T. Marth,et al.  Novel somatic and germline mutations in intracranial germ cell tumours , 2014, Nature.

[6]  James D. Brenton,et al.  Phylogenetic Quantification of Intra-tumour Heterogeneity , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  T. Tot,et al.  Molecular phenotype of the foci in multifocal invasive breast carcinomas: Intertumoral heterogeneity is related to shorter survival and may influence the choice of therapy , 2014, Cancer.

[8]  I. Novopashenny,et al.  Comparing the outcome between multicentric and multifocal breast cancer: what is the impact on survival, and is there a role for guideline-adherent adjuvant therapy? A retrospective multicenter cohort study of 8,935 patients , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[9]  M. Stratton,et al.  Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2013, Blood.

[10]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy-number alteration , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[11]  L. Tabár,et al.  Multifocal breast cancer documented in large‐format histology sections , 2013, Cancer.

[12]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Multifocality and multicentricity in breast cancer and survival outcomes. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  Copynumber: Efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[14]  S. Folli,et al.  Multicentric/multifocal breast cancer with a single histotype: is the biological characterization of all individual foci justified? , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  The Life History of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.

[16]  A. McKenna,et al.  Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Sung-Won Kim,et al.  The hormone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and molecular subtype status of individual tumor foci in multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. , 2012, Human pathology.

[18]  T. Tot Early and more advanced unifocal and multifocal breast carcinomas and their molecular phenotypes. , 2011, Clinical breast cancer.

[19]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Exome sequencing identifies frequent mutation of the SWI/SNF complex gene PBRM1 in renal carcinoma , 2010, Nature.

[20]  R. Eeles,et al.  Multicentric breast cancer: clonality and prognostic studies , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  R. Rouzier,et al.  Multiple synchronous (multifocal and multicentric) breast cancer: clinical implications. , 2010, Surgical oncology.

[22]  Andrew Menzies,et al.  The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer , 2010, Nature.

[23]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  COMPLEX LANDSCAPES OF SOMATIC REARRANGEMENT IN HUMAN BREAST CANCER GENOMES , 2009, Nature.

[24]  Gregory Y. Lauwers,et al.  Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast , 2009 .

[25]  Kai Ye,et al.  Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads , 2009, Bioinform..

[26]  V. Ozmen,et al.  Increased lymph node positivity in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[27]  Donald L Weaver,et al.  Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[28]  Ivo A. Olivotto,et al.  Does multicentric/multifocal breast cancer differ from unifocal breast cancer? An analysis of survival and contralateral breast cancer incidence , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[29]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  Multifocality as a prognostic factor in breast cancer patients registered in Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) 1996-2001. , 2008, Breast.

[30]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Multifocal breast cancer in women ≤35 years old , 2007, Cancer.

[31]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[32]  S. Singletary,et al.  Impact of multicentricity on clinical outcome in patients with T1-2, N0-1, M0 breast cancer , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[33]  R. Lothe,et al.  Assessment of clonal relationships in ipsilateral and bilateral multiple breast carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridisation and hierarchical clustering analysis , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[34]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  The prognostic influence of multifocality in breast cancer patients. , 2004, Breast.

[35]  D Barnes,et al.  Immunohistochemical detection of steroid receptors in breast cancer: a working protocol , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[36]  H. Magdelenat The Receptor and Biomarker Study Group of the EORTC , 2000 .

[37]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  B Asselain,et al.  Comparison of the prognostic value of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson and Nottingham histological grades in a series of 825 cases of breast cancer: major importance of the mitotic count as a component of both grading systems. , 1998, Anticancer research.

[39]  R. Clark,et al.  Mechanisms of multifocal breast cancer: an immunocytochemical study. , 1995, Human pathology.

[40]  S. Hirohashi,et al.  Identification of multiple breast cancers of multicentric origin by histological observations and distribution of allele loss on chromosome 16q. , 1995, Cancer research.

[41]  S. Noguchi,et al.  Discrimination between multicentric and multifocal carcinomas of the breast through clonal analysis , 1994, Cancer.

[42]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[43]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Results of conservative surgery and radiation therapy for multiple synchronous cancers of one breast. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.