Mechanisms of evoked and induced responses in MEG/EEG

Cortical responses, recorded by electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography, can be characterized in the time domain, to study event-related potentials/fields, or in the time-frequency domain, to study oscillatory activity. In the literature, there is a common conception that evoked, induced, and on-going oscillations reflect different neuronal processes and mechanisms. In this work, we consider the relationship between the mechanisms generating neuronal transients and how they are expressed in terms of evoked and induced power. This relationship is addressed using a neuronally realistic model of interacting neuronal subpopulations. Neuronal transients were generated by changing neuronal input (a dynamic mechanism) or by perturbing the systems coupling parameters (a structural mechanism) to produce induced responses. By applying conventional time-frequency analyses, we show that, in contradistinction to common conceptions, induced and evoked oscillations are perhaps more related than previously reported. Specifically, structural mechanisms normally associated with induced responses can be expressed in evoked power. Conversely, dynamic mechanisms posited for evoked responses can induce responses, if there is variation in neuronal input. We conclude, it may be better to consider evoked responses as the results of mixed dynamic and structural effects. We introduce adjusted power to complement induced power. Adjusted power is unaffected by trial-to-trial variations in input and can be attributed to structural perturbations without ambiguity.

[1]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Nelson,et al.  Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Karl J. Friston Brain function, nonlinear coupling, and neuronal transients. , 2001, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[5]  T. Bullock,et al.  Induced Rhythms in the Brain , 1992, Brain Dynamics.

[6]  T. Albright,et al.  Contextual influences on visual processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses , 2002, Science.

[8]  S. Bressler,et al.  Trial-to-trial variability of cortical evoked responses: implications for the analysis of functional connectivity , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Gain Modulation A Major Computational Principle of the Central Nervous System , 2000, Neuron.

[11]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Anatomical origins of the classical receptive field and modulatory surround field of single neurons in macaque visual cortical area V1. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[12]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  R. Guillery,et al.  On the actions that one nerve cell can have on another: distinguishing "drivers" from "modulators". , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Contextual Influences in Visual Processing , 2008 .

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[19]  C. Gray,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms Contributing to Response Variability of Cortical Neurons In Vivo , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Stefan J Kiebel,et al.  Parametric analysis of oscillatory activity as measured with EEG/MEG , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[21]  M. Coles,et al.  Event-related brain potentials: An introduction. , 1995 .

[22]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[23]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  P. C. Murphy,et al.  Feedback connections to the lateral geniculate nucleus and cortical response properties. , 1999, Science.

[25]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Dynamics of the human alpha rhythm: evidence for non-linearity? , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modulation of excitatory synaptic coupling facilitates synchronization and complex dynamics in a biophysical model of neuronal dynamics , 2003, Network.

[27]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Gain Modulation from Background Synaptic Input , 2002, Neuron.

[28]  Karl J. Friston Book Review: Brain Function, Nonlinear Coupling, and Neuronal Transients , 2001 .

[29]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Model of brain rhythmic activity , 1974, Kybernetik.

[30]  C. Koch,et al.  Constraints on cortical and thalamic projections: the no-strong-loops hypothesis , 1998, Nature.

[31]  Ben H. Jansen,et al.  Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling event-related responses in the brain , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  Fabrice Wendling,et al.  Relevance of nonlinear lumped-parameter models in the analysis of depth-EEG epileptic signals , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  S. du Lac,et al.  Regulation of firing response gain by calcium-dependent mechanisms in vestibular nucleus neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modulation of excitatory synaptic coupling facilitates synchronization and complex dynamics in a biophysical model of neuronal dynamics , 2003 .

[36]  F. Varela Resonant cell assemblies: a new approach to cognitive functions and neuronal synchrony. , 1995, Biological research.

[37]  C. Parmesan,et al.  Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming , 1999, Nature.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics , 2003, NeuroImage.

[39]  Karl J. Friston Transients, Metastability, and Neuronal Dynamics , 1997, NeuroImage.

[40]  W. Freeman Models of the dynamics of neural populations. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[41]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  Phase-locked alpha and theta oscillations generate the P1-N1 complex and are related to memory performance. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[42]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[43]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind. , 1996 .

[44]  John R. Terry,et al.  Detection and description of non-linear interdependence in normal multichannel human EEG data , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  P. Robinson,et al.  Prediction of electroencephalographic spectra from neurophysiology. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[46]  J. Bullier,et al.  The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[47]  Freeman Wj Models of the dynamics of neural populations. , 1978 .