Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents

We consider the problem of optimizing the placement of stubborn agents in a social network in order to maximally impact population opinions. We assume individuals in a directed social network each have a latent opinion that evolves over time in response to social media posts by their neighbors. The individuals randomly communicate noisy versions of their latent opinion to their neighbors. Each individual updates his opinion using a time-varying update rule that has him become more stubborn with time and be less affected by new posts. The dynamic update rule is a novel component of our model and reflects realistic behaviors observed in many psychological studies. We show that in the presence of stubborn agents with immutable opinions and under fairly general conditions on the stubbornness rate of the individuals, the opinions converge to an equilibrium determined by a linear system. We give an interesting electrical network interpretation of the equilibrium. We also use this equilibrium to present a simple closed form expression for harmonic influence centrality, which is a function that quantifies how much a node can affect the mean opinion in a network. We develop a discrete optimization formulation for the problem of maximally shifting opinions in a network by targeting nodes with stubborn agents. We show that this is an optimization problem with a monotone and submodular objective, allowing us to utilize a greedy algorithm. Finally, we show that a small number of stubborn agents can non-trivially influence a large population using simulated networks.

[1]  Dennis S. Bernstein,et al.  Matrix Mathematics: Theory, Facts, and Formulas with Application to Linear Systems Theory , 2005 .

[2]  Lawrence Gray,et al.  Duality for General Attractive Spin Systems with Applications in One Dimension , 1986 .

[3]  Jytte Klausen,et al.  Finding Online Extremists in Social Networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[4]  Dan Braha,et al.  Dynamical Response of Networks Under External Perturbations: Exact Results , 2007, 0705.4607.

[5]  R. Niemi,et al.  Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents , 1981 .

[6]  R. Srikant,et al.  Opinion dynamics in social networks: A local interaction game with stubborn agents , 2012, 2013 American Control Conference.

[7]  Ιωαννησ Τσιτσικλησ,et al.  PROBLEMS IN DECENTRALIZED DECISION MAKING AND COMPUTATION , 1984 .

[8]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[9]  M. L. Fisher,et al.  An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I , 1978, Math. Program..

[10]  G. Markus The Political Environment and the Dynamics of Public Attitudes: A Panel Study , 1979 .

[11]  Wei Chen,et al.  Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks , 2010, KDD.

[12]  M. Mobilia Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters? , 2003, Physical review letters.

[13]  S. Redner,et al.  Voter model on heterogeneous graphs. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[14]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Aging, Cohorts, and the Stability of Sociopolitical Orientations Over the Life Span , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Wei Chen,et al.  Efficient influence maximization in social networks , 2009, KDD.

[16]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2010, Math. Oper. Res..

[17]  M. Jennings,et al.  Partisan Orientations over the Long Haul: Results from the Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[18]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  Stochastic Approximation approach to Stochastic Programming , 2013 .

[19]  P. Clifford,et al.  A model for spatial conflict , 1973 .

[20]  R. Plemmons M-matrix characterizations.I—nonsingular M-matrices , 1977 .

[21]  H. Robbins A Stochastic Approximation Method , 1951 .

[22]  S. Galam,et al.  The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics , 2007, physics/0703021.

[23]  Omer Levy,et al.  word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding method , 2014, ArXiv.

[24]  Benjamin C. Heddy,et al.  Values, Attitudes, and Beliefs , 2020 .

[25]  J. Sherman,et al.  Adjustment of an Inverse Matrix Corresponding to a Change in One Element of a Given Matrix , 1950 .

[26]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Message Passing Optimization of Harmonic Influence Centrality , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[27]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[28]  Anant Agarwal,et al.  Foundations of Analog and Digital Electronic Circuits , 2005 .

[29]  John Odentrantz,et al.  Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues , 2000, Technometrics.

[30]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Word-of-mouth learning , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[31]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Convergence Speed in Distributed Consensus and Averaging , 2009, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[32]  B. Roberts,et al.  Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[34]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence Within Social Networks , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[35]  R. Holley,et al.  Ergodic Theorems for Weakly Interacting Infinite Systems and the Voter Model , 1975 .

[36]  E. Seneta,et al.  Towards consensus: some convergence theorems on repeated averaging , 1977, Journal of Applied Probability.

[37]  S. Redner,et al.  On the role of zealotry in the voter model , 2007 .

[38]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[39]  Krapivsky Kinetics of monomer-monomer surface catalytic reactions. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[40]  Diemo Urbig,et al.  Attitude Dynamics With Limited Verbalisation Capabilities , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[41]  B. Huberman,et al.  Social Structure and Opinion Formation , 2004, cond-mat/0407252.

[42]  Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi,et al.  A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Consensus Over Random Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[43]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[44]  Gill Steel,et al.  Political Socialization (特集 民意) , 2014 .

[45]  Yoon Kim,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification , 2014, EMNLP.

[46]  Ilan Lobel,et al.  BAYESIAN LEARNING IN SOCIAL NETWORKS , 2008 .

[47]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Influential Nodes in a Diffusion Model for Social Networks , 2005, ICALP.

[48]  Chai Wah Wu,et al.  Synchronization and convergence of linear dynamics in random directed networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[49]  Mehmet E. Yildiz,et al.  Binary Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents , 2013, TEAC.

[50]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election , 2017, First Monday.

[51]  Philip E. Converse,et al.  Plus ça change…: The New CPS Election Study Panel , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[52]  J. T. Cox,et al.  Diffusive Clustering in the Two Dimensional Voter Model , 1986 .