Mechanisms and Evolution of Communal Sexual Displays in Arthropods and Anurans

Advertisement signals of sexually displaying males are among the most widely and thoroughly studied phenomena in animal behavior. Many of our current advances in understanding sexual selection, signal evolution and species recognition, biomechanics, sensory and cognitive ecology, and neuro‐ethology derive from studies that focus on male signaling activities. Communal sexual displays are a subset of these signaling phenomena, and they merit special attention on two grounds: First, communal displays of acoustically and visually signaling animals are acknowledged to include some of the ‘‘great spectacles of the living world’’ (Wilson, 1975). Anyone who has borne witness to the chorusing of periodical cicadas in central and eastern North America or the collective flashing of fireflies in the Indo‐ Malayan region cannot help but marvel at the sheer numbers of individuals involved and the intensity of their collective signaling output. But, communal sexual displays are noteworthy for more than just masses of participants and their volume of sound or brilliance of light. In many cases, the signals of individual participants are precisely choreographed in space and time, often giving rise to striking alternation or synchrony between neighbors (Alexander, 1975). Here, underlying aesthetic sensibilities may account for much of our interest: Perhaps related to a concern with orderliness and pattern in the natural world, we remain fascinatedwith synchronous phenomena of all forms (Pikovsky et al., 2002; Strogatz, 2003; see Neda et al., 2000 for an intriguing example from human behavior), particularly when these events defy obvious explanation. And it is this latter point that brings us to our second reason for focusing attention on communal sexual displays: The mechanisms and evolution of an individual’s signaling are often concealed from casual view, and it is only when signaling is interactive that these

[1]  J. E. Lloyd,et al.  Ecology, flashes, and behavior of congregating thai fireflies , 1989 .

[2]  Joshua J. Schwartz Male calling behavior, female discrimination and acoustic interference in the Neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala under realistic acoustic conditions , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  Kathy S. Williams,et al.  The Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution of Periodical Cicadas , 1995 .

[4]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  Mathematical aspects of heart physiology , 1975 .

[5]  Johanna Mappes,et al.  Adaptive significance of synchronous chorusing in an acoustically signalling wolf spider , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Yikweon Jang,et al.  Mechanisms of selective attention in grasshopper choruses: who listens to whom? , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  Michael D Greenfield Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Advertisement Signals , 1997 .

[8]  P. K. McGregor,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Behaviours specific to communication networks , 2005 .

[9]  H. Gerhardt Selective Responsiveness to Long-Range Acoustic Signals in Insects and Anurans , 1994 .

[10]  M. D. Jones The acoustic behaviour of the bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera. I. Alternation, synchronism and rivalry between males. , 1966, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  Onset of Evening Chorus in Tibicen marginalis (Homoptera: Cicadidae) , 1979 .

[12]  N. Aizawa Synchronous waving in an ocypodid crab, Ilyoplax pusilla : analyses of response patterns to video and real crabs , 1998 .

[13]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Katydids and Bush-Crickets: Reproductive Behavior and Evolution of the Tettigoniidae , 2003 .

[14]  J. Schwartz,et al.  How long do females really listen? Assessment time for female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  A. Perdeck The Isolating Value of Specific Song Patterns in Two Sibling Species of Grasshoppers (Chorthippus Brunneus Thunb. and C. Biguttulus L.) , 1958 .

[16]  Call Timing in Male-Male Acoustical Interactions and Female Choice in the Midwife Toad Alytes obstetricans , 2001, Copeia.

[17]  S. Strogatz From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators , 2000 .

[18]  Patrick M. Zurek,et al.  The Precedence Effect , 1987 .

[19]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Chorus dynamics of a neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer simulation and natural behaviour , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The sound of many hands clapping: Tumultuous applause can transform itself into waves of synchronized clapping. , 2000 .

[21]  S. Telford,et al.  The effect of chorus organization on mate localization in the Painted Reed frog (Hyperolius marmoratus) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  Jonathan Copeland,et al.  The occurrence of synchrony in the North American fireflyPhotinus carolinus (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) , 1994, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[23]  J. Schwartz THE FUNCTION OF CALL ALTERNATION IN ANURAN AMPHIBIANS: A TEST OF THREE HYPOTHESES , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Insect hearing in the field , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[25]  Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al.  Communication Networks , 2000 .

[26]  T. U. Grafe,et al.  Synchronized interdigitated calling in the Kuvangu running frog, Kassina kuvangensis , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  J. Rheinlaender,et al.  Temporal parameters of male—female sound communication in Leptophyes punctatissima , 1986 .

[28]  R. Robertson,et al.  Neuronal Circuits: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1986, Science.

[29]  A. M. Young,et al.  Temporal Selection for Communicatory Optimization: The Dawn-Dusk Chorus as an Adaptation in Tropical Cicadas , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[30]  The effect of variation in parameters of the male calling song of the katydid,Amblycorypha parvipennis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), on female phonotaxis and phonoresponse , 1996, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[31]  R. Márquez,et al.  ACOUSTICAL INTERFERENCE IN THE ADVERTISEMENT CALLS OF THE MIDWIFE TOADS (ALYTES OBSTETRICANS AND ALYTES CISTERNASII) , 2000 .

[32]  J. Buck,et al.  SYNCHRONOUS FLASHING OF FIREFLIES EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED. , 1935, Science.

[33]  H. C. Gerhardt,et al.  Call matching in the quacking frog (Crinia georgiana) , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  T. J. Walker,et al.  Acoustic Synchrony: Two Mechanisms in the Snowy Tree Cricket , 1969, Science.

[35]  Hanson Fe Comparative studies of firefly pacemakers. , 1978 .

[36]  M. K. Tourtellot,et al.  Chorus structure in tarbush grasshoppers: inhibition, selective phonoresponse and signal competition , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  H. Dybas,et al.  THE PERIODICAL CICADA PROBLEM. I. POPULATION ECOLOGY , 1966, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Female pheromonal chorusing in an arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix , 2007 .

[39]  E. Sismondo,et al.  Synchronous, Alternating, and Phase-Locked Stridulation by a Tropical Katydid , 1990, Science.

[40]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in auditory receptor fibres of the locust (Locusta migratoria L.) , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[41]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Effects of signal duration on the recognition of masked communication signals by the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[42]  K. Wells,et al.  Interspecific acoustic interactions of the neotropical treefrog Hyla ebraccata , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  H. Römer,et al.  A gain-control mechanism for processing of chorus sounds in the afferent auditory pathway of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[44]  E. Wilson,et al.  Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , 1975 .

[45]  H S Colburn,et al.  The precedence effect. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  The role of synchronized calling, ambient light, and ambient noise, in anti-bat-predator behavior of a treefrog , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[47]  Kimberly G. Smith,et al.  Emergence of 13‐Yr Periodical Cicadas (Cicadidae: Magicicada): Phenology, Mortality, and Predators Satiation , 1993 .

[48]  R. Miles,et al.  Directionality in the mechanical response to substrate vibration in a treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Umbonia crassicornis) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[49]  P. Rau Rhythmic Periodicity and Synchronous Flashing in the Firefly, Photinus Pyralis, with Notes on Photurus Pennsylvanicus , 1932 .

[50]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Effects of heterospecific call overlap on the phonotactic behaviour of grey treefrogs , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  E. Tauber Bidirectional communication system in katydids: the effect on chorus structure , 2001 .

[52]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Synchronization of pulse-coupled biological oscillators , 1990 .

[53]  E. Lewis,et al.  The call-timing algorithm of the white-lipped frog,Leptodactylus albilabris , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[54]  Ultrasonic Signal Competition Between Male Wax Moths , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[55]  G. K. Morris,et al.  Orthopteran mating systems : sexual competition in a diverse group of insects , 1983 .

[56]  P. Narins Evolution of Anuran Chorus Behavior: Neural and Behavioral Constraints , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[57]  Michael D Greenfield Evolution of Acoustic Communication in the Genus Neoconocephalus: Discontinuous Songs, Synchrony, and Interspecific Interactions , 1990 .

[58]  J. G. Morin Symposium: Insect Behavioral Ecology--85: "Firefleas" of the Sea: Luminescent Signaling in Marine Ostracode Crustaceans , 1986 .

[59]  K. Wells,et al.  An experimental study of acoustic interference between two species of neotropical treefrogs , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  R. Dukas,et al.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[61]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[62]  G. Henning,et al.  Forward and backward masking with brief impulsive stimuli , 1999, Hearing Research.

[63]  T. Eisner,et al.  Sexually transmitted chemical defense in a moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  Frank E. Hanson,et al.  Control of flashing in fireflies , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[65]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Frogs Have Rules: Selective Attention Algorithms Regulate Chorusing in Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae) , 2000 .

[66]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  DUET SINGING AND FEMALE CHOICE IN THE BUSHCRICKET PHANEROPTERA NANA , 2001 .

[67]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Self-organizing processes: The sound of many hands clapping , 2000, Nature.

[68]  Hans Wallach,et al.  The precedence effect in sound localization. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[69]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[70]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Animal cooperation among unrelated individuals , 2002, Naturwissenschaften.

[71]  M. Duijm On Some Song Characteristics in Ephippiger (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea) and Their Geographic Variation , 1989 .

[72]  M. McClintock,et al.  Menstrual Synchrony and Suppression , 1971, Nature.

[73]  M. K. Tourtellot,et al.  Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  Regulation of Chorusing in the Vibrational Communication System of the Leafhopper Graminella nigrifrons1 , 2001 .

[75]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Court and spark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotoid fish , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[76]  S H Strogatz,et al.  Coupled oscillators and biological synchronization. , 1993, Scientific American.

[77]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[78]  F E Hanson,et al.  Synchrony and Flash Entrainment in a New Guinea Firefly , 1971, Science.

[79]  J. Struger,et al.  Acoustic entrainment to randomly generated calls by the frog, Hyla crucifer , 1980 .

[80]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Acoustic interactions among male gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, in a chorus setting , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[81]  T. Eisner,et al.  Sex attractant of an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): A pulsed chemical signal , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[82]  T. G. Forrest,et al.  Models of female choice in acoustic communication , 1994 .

[83]  Frank E. Hanson,et al.  Control of flashing in fireflies , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[84]  Richard D. Alexander,et al.  Studies on the Acoustical Behavior of Seventeen-Year Cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada) , 1958 .

[85]  Daniel Otte On Theories of Flash Synchronization in Fireflies , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[86]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Psychoacoustics of female phonotaxis and the evolution of male signal interactions in Orthoptera , 1995 .

[87]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Cooperation and Conflict in the Evolution of Signal Interactions , 1994 .

[88]  W. Bailey,et al.  The Tettigoniidae: biology, systematics and evolution. , 1990 .

[89]  Michael D Greenfield Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication , 2002 .

[90]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Females prefer leading males: relative call timing and sexual selection in katydid choruses , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[91]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Variation and Repeatability of Female Choice in a Chorusing Katydid, Ephippiger ephippiger: an Experimental Exploration of the Precedence Effect , 2004 .

[92]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[93]  K. Wells The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[94]  J. Prager,et al.  Pulse-train synchronous pair-stridulation by maleSigara striata (Heteroptera, Corixidae) , 1980, Experientia.

[95]  Gerald S. Pollack,et al.  Neural Processing of Acoustic Signals , 1998 .

[96]  B. Hedwig,et al.  Contralateral inhibition as a sensory bias: the neural basis for a female preference in a synchronously calling bushcricket, Mecopoda elongata , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[97]  C. Simon,et al.  Evolutionary ecology of periodical insects. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[98]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Insect hearing in the field , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[99]  S. A. Perrill,et al.  Responses To Conspecific Advertisement Calls in the Green Frog (Rana Clamitans) and Their Role in Male-Male Communication , 1996 .

[100]  K. C. Shaw An Analysis of the Phonoresponse of Males of the True Katydid, Pterophylla Camellifolia (Fabricius) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1968 .

[101]  R. Karban INCREASED REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AT HIGH DENSITIES AND PREDATOR SATIATION FOR PERIODICAL CICADAS , 1982 .

[102]  W. Bailey Insect duets: underlying mechanisms and their evolution , 2003 .

[103]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Flashing males win mate success , 1996, Nature.

[104]  A. Moiseff,et al.  Flash Precision at the Start of Synchrony in Photuris frontalis1 , 2004, Integrative and comparative biology.

[105]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Sync: How Order Emerges from Chaos in the Universe, Nature, and Daily Life , 2004 .

[106]  R. Dukas,et al.  Cognitive ecology : the evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making , 1998 .

[107]  Gilbert B. Waldbauer,et al.  Insects, Science, and Society , 1976 .

[108]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[109]  Christopher G. Murphy NIGHTLY TIMING OF CHORUSING BY MALE BARKING TREEFROGS (HYLA GRATIOSA) : THE INFLUENCE OF FEMALE ARRIVAL AND ENERGY , 1999 .

[110]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionarily stable outcome of female choice , 1993, Nature.

[111]  J. Buck Synchronous Rhythmic Flashing of Fireflies. II. , 1938, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[112]  J. E. Lloyd,et al.  FLASH BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF THAI LUCIOLA FIREFLIES (COLEOPTERA: LAMPYRIDAE) , 1989 .

[113]  A. D. Carlson,et al.  Proximate Mechanisms of Sexual Selection in the Firefly Photinus pyralis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) , 1998, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[114]  Jasper J. Loftus-Hills,et al.  Analysis of an acoustic pacemaker in Strecker's chorus frog,Pseudacris streckeri (Anura: Hylidae) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[115]  M. Naguib,et al.  Vocal Interactions in Birds: The Use of Song as a Model in Communication , 2000 .

[116]  Andrea Megela Simmons,et al.  Patterns of Vocal Interactions in a Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) Chorus: Preferential Responding to Far Neighbors , 2000 .

[117]  B. Ermentrout,et al.  An adaptive model for synchrony in the firefly Pteroptyx malaccae , 1991 .

[118]  R. Hoy,et al.  Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[119]  Franz Huber,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[120]  Michael D Greenfield Inhibition of male calling by heterospecific signals , 1993, Naturwissenschaften.

[121]  M. Busnel Rivalité acoustique et hiérarchie chez l'ephippiger (insecte, orthoptère, Tettigoniidea,) , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[122]  P. Backwell,et al.  Variation in courtship rate in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes: is it related to male attractiveness? , 1998 .

[123]  Female reply strategies in a duetting Australian bushcricket, Caedicia sp. (Phaneropterinae: Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[124]  Modulation of auditory responsiveness in stridulating grasshoppers , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[125]  P. Stoddard Electric signals: Predation, sex, and environmental constraints , 2002 .

[126]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[127]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Phonotaxis and aggression in the coneheaded katydid Neoconocephalus affinis , 1985 .

[128]  T. J. Walker Specificity in the Response of Female Tree Crickets (Orthoptera, Gryllidae, Oecanthinae) to Calling Songs of the Males , 1957 .

[129]  Selective attention and the spatio-temporal structure of orthopteran choruses , 2003 .

[130]  D. Pope Animal Communication Networks: Waving in a crowd: fiddler crabs signal in networks , 2005 .

[131]  Richard D. Alexander,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION AND SPECIALIZED CHORUSING BEHAVIOR IN ACOUSTICAL INSECTS , 1975 .

[132]  J. Buck,et al.  Mechanism of Rhythmic Synchronous Flashing of Fireflies , 1968, Science.

[133]  T. Grafe A function of synchronous chorusing and a novel female preference shift in an anuran , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[134]  A. Moiseff,et al.  A New Type of Synchronized Flashing in a North American Firefly , 2000, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[135]  R A Wyttenbach,et al.  Demonstration of the precedence effect in an insect. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[136]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.

[137]  W. Latimer,et al.  Acoustic interference in bush crickets; a factor in the evolution of singing insects? , 1984 .

[138]  H. Bennet-Clark How cicadas make their noise , 1998 .

[139]  Opposite Density Effects of Nymphal and Adult Mortality for Periodical Cicadas , 1984 .

[140]  D. Helversen,et al.  Acoustic communication in phaneropterid bushcrickets: species-specific delay of female stridulatory response and matching male sensory time window , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[141]  R Y Litovsky,et al.  Investigation of the relationship among three common measures of precedence: fusion, localization dominance, and discrimination suppression. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[142]  Neville Passmore,et al.  Synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs , 1998, Nature.

[143]  F C Hoppensteadt,et al.  Synchronization of periodical cicada emergences. , 1976, Science.

[144]  R L Freyman,et al.  Intensity discrimination for precedence effect stimuli. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[145]  William H. Cade,et al.  Alternation calling and spacing patterns in the field cricket Acanthogryllus fortipes (Orthoptera; Gryllidae) , 1982 .

[146]  P. Backwell,et al.  Female Choice in the Synchronously Waving Fiddler Crab Uca annulipes , 1999 .

[147]  Jonathan Copeland,et al.  Mechanisms of synchrony in the North American fireflyPhotinus carolinus (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[148]  M. Ryan Synchronized calling in a treefrog (Smilisca sila). Short behavioral latencies and implications for neural pathways involved in call perception and production. , 1986, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[149]  A. Meixner,et al.  Acoustic and Associated Behavior of the Coneheaded Katydid, Neoconocephalus nebrascensis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1986 .

[150]  J. Buck,et al.  Toward a Functional Interpretation of Synchronous Flashing by Fireflies , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[151]  Helen R. S. Gordon Synchronous claw-waving of fiddler crabs , 1958 .

[152]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Sexual Selection in Insect Choruses: Influences of Call Power and Relative Timing , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[153]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Characterization of the advertisement call oscillator in the frogEleutherodactylus coqui , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[154]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  Acoustic communication in the Palaearctic red cicada, Tibicina haematodes: chorus organisation, calling-song structure, and signal recognition , 2002 .

[155]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) , 2002 .

[156]  R. Wyttenbach,et al.  Psychophysics in insect hearing , 2004, Microscopy research and technique.

[157]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[158]  Unsynchronized chorusing in the coneheaded katydid Neoconocephalus affinis (Beauvois) , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[159]  J. Schwartz Why stop calling? A study of unison bout singing in a Neotropical treefrog , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[160]  Manfred Hartbauer,et al.  Mechanisms for synchrony and alternation in song interactions of the bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera) , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[161]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Carbohydrate and calling: Depletion of muscle glycogen and the chorusing dynamics of the neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[162]  N. Passmore,et al.  Two-choice phonotaxis in Hyperolius marmoratus (Anura: Hyperoliidae): the effect of temporal variation in presented stimuli , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[163]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Synchronous and Alternating Choruses in Insects and Anurans: Common Mechanisms and Diverse Functions , 1994 .

[164]  J. Krebs,et al.  Mate selection in Pacific tree frogs , 1975, Nature.

[165]  W. Conner,et al.  Neural control of rhythmic pheromone gland exposure in Utetheisa ornatrix (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) , 1987 .

[166]  T. E. Moore,et al.  The evolutionary relationships of 17-year and 13-year cicadas, and three new species (Homoptera, Cicadidae, Magicicada) , 1963 .

[167]  T. U. Grafe,et al.  The function of call alternation in the African reed frog (Hyperolius marmoratus): precise call timing prevents auditory masking , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[168]  R. Márquez,et al.  Female preference function related to precedence effect in an amphibian anuran (Alytes cisternasii): tests with non-overlapping calls , 2002 .