Incidence of actionable findings on contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography ordered for pulmonary embolism evaluation.

PURPOSE To determine the incidence of actionable findings on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) scans performed for the primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a HIPAA-compliant and IRB-approved single center, retrospective study of consecutive series of patients evaluated with contrast-enhanced MRA for PE. The final radiology report of each MRA was reviewed. All technically adequate negative exams were included in the analysis. The findings were divided into three types: those requiring further action (actionable-Type 1) those not requiring follow-up (non-actionable-Type 2) and normal exams. We compared our results with the literature regarding the use of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in this scenario using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS 580 MRA scans for PE were performed. There were 561/580 (97%) technically adequate exams. Of these, 514/580 (89%) were negative and 47/580 (8%) were positive for PE. In the PE negative group of 514 exams, Type 1 findings were identified in 85/514 (17%), 188/514 (36%) cases were Type 2 and 241/514 (47.0%) were Type 3. There was no significant difference between the incidence of Type 1 and the combination of Type 2 and Type 3 findings on MRA and the reported incidence of actionable findings derived from CTA negative exams for PE (p<0.5). CONCLUSION MRA as a first-line test for PE can identify actionable findings in those patients without PE, with an incidence similar to that reported in the literature for CTA.

[1]  J. Bloem,et al.  Helical computed tomography and alternative diagnosis in patients with excluded pulmonary embolism , 2005, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[2]  Paolo Prandoni,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2012, Chest.

[3]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Triage for suspected acute Pulmonary Embolism: Think before opening Pandora's Box. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[4]  Samuel Z Goldhaber,et al.  Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER) , 1999, The Lancet.

[5]  William B Hall,et al.  The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  G. E. Newman,et al.  Pulmonary angiography with MR imaging: preliminary clinical experience. , 1993, Radiology.

[8]  Johannes T. Heverhagen,et al.  Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Agents Amplify DNA Radiation Damage at CT. , 2015, Radiology.

[9]  D. DeLong,et al.  Prospective comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Kevin M Johnson,et al.  Pulmonary Embolism Detection with Three-dimensional Ultrashort Echo Time MR Imaging: Experimental Study in Canines. , 2016, Radiology.

[11]  Himanshu Shah,et al.  Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. , 2004, Radiology.

[12]  K. Garg,et al.  Clinical validity of helical CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism: implications for patient treatment. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Hobbs Wj,et al.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. , 1997 .

[14]  J. Listerud,et al.  Suspected pulmonary embolism: prospective evaluation with pulmonary MR angiography. , 1993, Radiology.

[15]  K. Leeper,et al.  Troponin levels as a guide to treatment of pulmonary embolism , 2003, Current opinion in pulmonary medicine.

[16]  Kevin M. Johnson,et al.  Optimized 3D ultrashort echo time pulmonary MRI , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  T. Moua,et al.  COPD and PE: A clinical dilemma , 2008, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[18]  N L Müller,et al.  Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. , 1999, Radiology.

[19]  S. Obenauer,et al.  64-Multidetector-row spiral CT in pulmonary embolism with emphasis on incidental findings. , 2008, Clinical imaging.

[20]  P. Pattynama,et al.  Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Prevalence and Anatomic Distribution in 487 Consecutive Patients , 2000 .

[21]  P. Stein,et al.  Ancillary Findings on CT Pulmonary Angiograms and Abnormalities on Chest Radiographs in Patients in Whom Pulmonary Embolism was Excluded , 2012, Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis.

[22]  J. Remy,et al.  Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique--comparison with pulmonary angiography. , 1992, Radiology.

[23]  L. Parkin,et al.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in users of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel: nested case-control study based on UK General Practice Research Database , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  E. Sala,et al.  Spiral computed tomographic pulmonary angiography for investigating suspected pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes. , 2003, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[25]  David Saloner,et al.  Vascular Imaging With Ferumoxytol as a Contrast Agent. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  H. Sostman,et al.  Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  A. van Rossum,et al.  Can helical CT replace scintigraphy in the diagnostic process in suspected pulmonary embolism? A retrolective-prolective cohort study focusing on total diagnostic yield , 1998, European Radiology.

[28]  J. Stockman.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in users of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel: Nested case-control study based on UK General Practice Research Database , 2013 .

[29]  L. Goodman.  Computed tomography in the emergency department setting. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[30]  Shigeru Furui,et al.  High Signal Intensity in Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images: Association with Linear versus Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelate Administration. , 2015, Radiology.

[31]  J. Kline,et al.  Prevalence and significance of nonthromboembolic findings on chest computed tomography angiography performed to rule out pulmonary embolism: a multicenter study of 1,025 emergency department patients. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[32]  Martine Remy-Jardin,et al.  Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. , 2007, Radiology.

[33]  D. DeLong,et al.  Detection of Pulmonary Embolism: Comparison of Contrast‐Enhanced Spiral CT and Time‐of‐Flight MR Techniques , 1995, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[34]  V. Tapson.  Acute pulmonary embolism. , 2004, Cardiology clinics.

[35]  M. Repplinger,et al.  Effectiveness of MR angiography for the primary diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: Clinical outcomes at 3 months and 1 year , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  D. Brenner.  What we know and what we don't know about cancer risks associated with radiation doses from radiological imaging , 2014, The British journal of radiology.