Combining Relevance Information in a Synchronous Collaborative Information Retrieval Environment

Traditionally information retrieval (IR) research has focussed on a single user interaction modality, where a user searches to satisfy an information need. Recent advances in both web technologies, such as the sociable web of Web 2.0, and computer hardware, such as tabletop interface devices, have enabled multiple users to collaborate on many computer-related tasks. Due to these advances there is an increasing need to support two or more users searching together at the same time, in order to satisfy a shared information need, which we refer to as Synchronous Collaborative Information Retrieval. Synchronous Collaborative Information Retrieval (SCIR) represents a significant paradigmatic shift from traditional IR systems. In order to support an effective SCIR search, new techniques are required to coordinate users' activities. In this chapter we explore the effectiveness of a sharing of knowledge policy on a collaborating group. Sharing of knowledge refers to the process of passing relevance information across users, if one user finds items of relevance to the search task then the group should benefit in the form of improved ranked lists returned to each searcher. In order to evaluate the proposed techniques we simulate two users searching together through an incremental feedback system. The simulation assumes that users decide on an initial query with which to begin the collaborative search and proceed through the search by providing relevance judgments to the system and receiving a new ranked list. In order to populate these simulations we extract data from the interaction logs of various experimental IR systems from previous Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) workshops.

[1]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  Supporting cooperative WWW browsing: a proxy-based approach , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing. PDP'99.

[2]  John Adcock,et al.  FXPAL Interactive Search Experiments for TRECVID 2007 , 2007, TRECVID.

[3]  George C. Polyzos,et al.  Efficient cooperative searching on the Web: system design and evaluation , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Nick Craswell,et al.  An experimental comparison of click position-bias models , 2008, WSDM '08.

[5]  Karen Spärck Jones Search Term Relevance Weighting given Little Relevance Information , 1997, J. Documentation.

[6]  T. E. Doerfler,et al.  The behaviour of some significance tests under experimental randomization , 1969 .

[7]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  The físchlár digital video system: a digital library of broadcast TV programmes , 2001, JCDL '01.

[8]  Mahmoud Naghshineh,et al.  WebSplitter: a unified XML framework for multi-device collaborative Web browsing , 2000, CSCW '00.

[9]  Takahiro Hara,et al.  A collaborative Web browsing system for multiple mobile users , 2004, Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PERCOM'06).

[10]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction , 2004, CHI.

[11]  John Grundy,et al.  Collaborative work with the World Wide Web: Adding CSCW support to a Web Browser , 1996 .

[12]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search , 2007, UIST.

[13]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Let's browse: a collaborative Web browsing agent , 1998, IUI '99.

[14]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  On Term Selection for Query Expansion , 1991, J. Documentation.

[15]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Tangible interface for collaborative information retrieval , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[16]  Mukesh Dalal Personalized social & real-time collaborative search , 2007, WWW '07.

[17]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  GroupWeb: a WWW browser as real time groupware , 1996, CHI 1996.

[18]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Relevance weighting of search terms , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Allison Druin,et al.  Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration , 1999, CHI '99.

[20]  Andrew Scott,et al.  Collaborative browsing in the world wide web , 1997 .

[21]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  TRECVID 2004 Experiments in Dublin City University , 2004, TRECVID.

[22]  IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,et al.  Incremental relevance feedback , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[23]  Rashmi Krishnappa,et al.  Multi-user search engine (MUSE): supporting collaborative information seeking and retrieval , 2005 .

[24]  Andreas Paepcke,et al.  TeamSearch: comparing techniques for co-present collaborative search of digital media , 2006, First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06).

[25]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  TRECVid 2006 Experiments at Dublin City University , 2012, TRECVID.

[26]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Collaborative video searching on a tabletop , 2007, Multimedia Systems.

[27]  Vicente Trigo,et al.  Windows Live Messenger , 2006 .

[28]  Guillermo S. Zeballos Developing tools for efficient collaborative web browsing , 1999, CHI EA '99.

[29]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  The Fischlar Digital Video Recording, Analysis and Browsing System , 2000, RIAO.

[30]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Synchronous Collaborative Information Retrieval with Relevance Feedback , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing.

[31]  In-Young Ko,et al.  Synchronous and asynchronous collaborative information space analysis tools , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 ICPP Workshops on Collaboration and Mobile Computing (CMC'99). Group Communications (IWGC). Internet '99 (IWI'99). Industrial Applications on Network Computing (INDAP). Multime.

[32]  Darren Leigh,et al.  DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology , 2001, UIST '01.

[33]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Building real-time groupware with GroupKit, a groupware toolkit , 1996, TCHI.

[34]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Okapi at TREC-3 , 1994, TREC.