Scenarios of Biased Galaxy Formation

The naive assumption that the galaxies trace the underlying mass distribution makes life easy: it enables us to estimate the total mass density in the universe and to interpret the large-scale structure based on the observed distribution of galaxies. But when assuming that the mass lies where we see light, aren’t we playing the role of the drunk who is searching for his lost keys under the street light because it is easier to look there? I would argue that based on the observed correlation of the type of a galaxy and its environment [1], it would be astonishing if galaxy formation itself was not affected by environmental effects segregating the galaxies from the underlying mass. I will first summarize the motivation behind this suspicion and then, together with Martin Rees in the following talk, discuss bias mechanisms in the various cosmogonies, arguing that a segregation of one sort or another is a natural outcome of almost every cosmogony (although the bias is not always of the desired sort). I will conclude by trying to point at key observational tests.

[1]  Allan Sandage,et al.  The velocity field of bright nearby galaxies. III - The distribution in space of galaxies within 80 megaparsecs - The north galactic density anomaly , 1980 .

[2]  J. Centrella,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of large-scale structure in the Universe , 1983, Nature.

[3]  Albrecht,et al.  Evolution of cosmic strings. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[4]  P. Peebles Tests of Cosmological Models Constrained by Inflation , 1984 .

[5]  J. Ostriker,et al.  Galaxy formation in an intergalactic medium dominated by explosions , 1981 .

[6]  M. Rees Mechanisms for biased galaxy formation , 1985 .

[7]  Neta A. Bahcall,et al.  The Spatial correlation function of RICH clusters of galaxies , 1983 .

[8]  J. Silk Schemes for biased galaxy formation , 1985 .

[9]  N. Kaiser On the spatial correlations of Abell clusters , 1984 .

[10]  E. Salpeter,et al.  Dynamical models and our virgocentric deviation from Hubble flow , 1982 .

[11]  A. Dekel Superclusters as nondissipative pancakes : flattening , 1983 .

[12]  J. Tonry,et al.  On the Virgo supercluster and the mean mass density of the universe. , 1980 .

[13]  Marc Davis,et al.  A survey of galaxy redshifts. V. The two-point position and velocity correlations. , 1983 .

[14]  B. Peterson,et al.  A complete galaxy redshift sample – I. The peculiar velocities between galaxy pairs and the mean mass density of the Universe , 1983 .

[15]  Y. Hoffman,et al.  Can Unclustered Matter Close the Universe , 1984 .

[16]  G. Efstathiou,et al.  The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter , 1985 .

[17]  K. Olive,et al.  Primordial nucleosynthesis: a critical comparison of theory and observation , 1984 .

[18]  A. Dressler Galaxy morphology in rich clusters: Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies , 1980 .

[19]  H. Politzer,et al.  Relations Between Spatial Correlations of Rich Clusters of Galaxies , 1984 .

[20]  Simon D. M. White,et al.  Clustering in a neutrino-dominated universe , 1983 .

[21]  G. Efstathiou Constraints on decaying particles from Virgo infall , 1985 .