A Self-Sensing Digital Twin of a Railway Bridge using the Statistical Finite Element Method

The monitoring of infrastructure assets using sensor networks is becoming increasingly prevalent. A digital twin in the form of a finite element model, as used in design and construction, can help in making sense of the copious amount of collected sensor data. This study demonstrates the application of the statistical finite element method (statFEM), which provides a consistent and principled means for synthesising data and physics-based models, in developing a digital twin of an instrumented railway bridge. The considered structure is a steel skewed half-through bridge of 27.34 m length located along the West Coast Mainline near Staffordshire in the UK. Using strain data captured from fibre Bragg grating (FBG) sensors at 108 locations along the bridge superstructure, statFEM can predict the ‘true’ system response while taking into account the uncertainties in sensor readings, applied loading and finite element model misspecification errors. Longitudinal strain distributions along the two main I-beams are both measured and modelled during the passage of a passenger train. The digital twin, because of its physics-based component, is able to generate reasonable strain distribution predictions at locations where no measurement data is available, including at several points along the main I-beams and on structural elements on which sensors are not even installed. The implications for long-term structural health monitoring and assessment include optimization of sensor placement, and performing more reliable what-if analyses at locations and under loading scenarios for which no measurement data is available.

[1]  Nicholas de Battista,et al.  Monitoring the axial displacement of a high-rise building under construction using embedded distributed fibre optic sensors , 2017 .

[2]  Rih-Teng Wu,et al.  Data fusion approaches for structural health monitoring and system identification: Past, present, and future , 2018, Structural Health Monitoring.

[3]  Yong Huang,et al.  State-of-the-art review on Bayesian inference in structural system identification and damage assessment , 2018, Advances in Structural Engineering.

[4]  Jerome Peter Lynch,et al.  An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Comparison of Approximate Methods for Handling Hyperparameters , 1999, Neural Computation.

[6]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[7]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization , 1997, TOMS.

[8]  Campbell Middleton,et al.  Performance Assessment of a Newly Constructed Skewed Half-Through Railway Bridge Using Integrated Sensing , 2019 .

[9]  Faming Liang,et al.  Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems , 2006, Technometrics.

[10]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[11]  Mark Girolami,et al.  A digital twin of bridges for structural health monitoring , 2019 .

[12]  Ye Xia,et al.  Review of Bridge Structural Health Monitoring Aided by Big Data and Artificial Intelligence: From Condition Assessment to Damage Detection , 2020 .

[13]  Peter Schröder,et al.  Integrated modeling, finite-element analysis, and engineering design for thin-shell structures using subdivision , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[14]  M. Girolami,et al.  The statistical finite element method (statFEM) for coherent synthesis of observation data and model predictions , 2019 .

[15]  Andrew M. Stuart,et al.  Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective , 2010, Acta Numerica.

[16]  Paul D. Arendt,et al.  Quantification of model uncertainty: Calibration, model discrepancy, and identifiability , 2012 .

[17]  Khairulmizam Samsudin,et al.  Wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: A contemporary review of technologies, challenges, and future direction , 2019, Structural Health Monitoring.

[18]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[19]  Malcolm A. Sabin,et al.  Subdivision surfaces with isogeometric analysis adapted refinement weights , 2018, Comput. Aided Des..

[20]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Random field simulation over curved surfaces: Applications to computational structural mechanics , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[21]  George K. Atia,et al.  Performance-based structural health monitoring through an innovative hybrid data interpretation framework , 2015 .

[22]  Fehmi Cirak,et al.  Subdivision shells with exact boundary control and non‐manifold geometry , 2011 .

[23]  James O. Berger,et al.  A Framework for Validation of Computer Models , 2007, Technometrics.

[24]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Iterative structural identification framework for evaluation of existing structures , 2016 .

[25]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[26]  Campbell Middleton,et al.  Monitoring, Modeling, and Assessment of a Self-Sensing Railway Bridge during Construction , 2018, Journal of Bridge Engineering.

[27]  Xuhong Zhou,et al.  Fatigue assessment of orthotropic steel bridge decks based on strain monitoring data , 2020 .

[28]  Liam J. Butler,et al.  The role of statistics in data-centric engineering , 2018 .

[29]  Xavier Masip-Bruin,et al.  Towards a proper service placement in combined Fog-to-Cloud (F2C) architectures , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[30]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Subdivision surfaces: a new paradigm for thin‐shell finite‐element analysis , 2000 .

[31]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[32]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Life-cycle of structural systems: recent achievements and future directions† , 2016 .

[33]  Irwanda Laory,et al.  Bayesian structural identification of a long suspension bridge considering temperature and traffic load effects , 2018, Structural Health Monitoring.

[34]  Kenichi Soga,et al.  Distributed fibre optic long-term monitoring of concrete-lined tunnel section TT10 at CERN , 2016 .

[35]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[36]  J. Beck.  Bayesian system identification based on probability logic , 2010 .

[37]  J M W Brownjohn,et al.  Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.