论文信息 - Remote monitoring of nests using digital camera technology

Remote monitoring of nests using digital camera technology

ABSTRACT Although cameras have been used for many years to collect data at birds' nests, recent advances in digital technology have led to increased storage capacity, faster and easier review of data, and reduced power consumption. The development of sophisticated triggering mechanisms, such as video motion detection, herald a new era of portable, energy-efficient systems that require less frequent maintenance. We used a digital infrared camera system to monitor predation events at the nests of ground-nesting Lapwings (Vanellus vanellus; N= 40) and tree-nesting Spotted Flycatchers (Muscicapa striata; N= 17). Eight predator species were recorded taking eggs or chicks at Lapwing (N= 10) and Spotted Flycatcher (N= 7) nests, including red fox (Vulpes vulpes), badger (Meles meles), sheep (Ovis aries), and Carrion Crow (Corvus corone) at Lapwing nests and Eurasian Jay (Garrulus glandarius), European Buzzard (Buteo buteo), Great-spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopus major), and domestic cat (Felis catus) at flycatcher nests. We tested three system configurations in an attempt to minimize power requirements and maximize predation-event recording capability. We found that the use of a passive-infrared sensor to awaken the system from standby mode did not compromise reliability and reduced power consumption. With this system, a 38-A h battery operated the system for 120 h with no maintenance at a cost per unit of about $800 (US; or £400 UK Sterling). Further modifications would permit adaptation of the system for a wide range of scientific and nest surveillance operations.

[1] T. Fuller,et al. An inexpensive compact automatic camera system for wildlife research , 1996 .

[2] F. Thompson,et al. Predation of Songbird Nests Differs By Predator and Between Field and Forest Habitats , 2003 .

[3] P. Flint,et al. A DEVICE FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY MEASURING NEST ATTENDANCE AND NEST TEMPERATURE IN WATERFOWL , 1995 .

[4] R. M. Anthony,et al. A quantitative approach to identifying predators from nest remains , 2004 .

[5] C. Ribic,et al. GRASSLAND PASSERINE NEST PREDATORS NEAR PASTURE EDGES IDENTIFIED ON VIDEOTAPE , 2003 .

[6] M. Lutman,et al. Predators on Red-winged Blackbird nests in eastern North Dakota , 2003 .

[7] Lynn M. Schriml,et al. A CAMERA STUDY OF TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF NEST PREDATION IN DIFFERENT HABITATS , 1994 .

[8] P. Pietz,et al. Identifying predators and fates of grassland passerine nests using miniature video cameras , 2000 .

[9] R. Ricklefs. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds , 1969 .

[10] R. Littell. SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[11] R. Holmes,et al. AN INEXPENSIVE METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING INCUBATION PATTERNS OF OPEN-CUP NESTING BIRDS, WITH DATA FOR BLACK-THROATED BLUE WARBLERS , 2001 .

[12] Travis L. Booms,et al. Time-lapse video system used to study nesting Gyrfalcons , 2003 .

[13] D. Noble,et al. The state of play of farmland birds: population trends and conservation status of lowland farmland birds in the United Kingdom , 2004 .