Coefficient of variation as a measure of subject effort.

This study describes average coefficients of variation (CVs) for various isometric strength tests in an impaired population, determines if differences exist in CVs between the various tests or between persons with different diagnoses, and determines the correlations between the CVs of differing tests. Survey data were collected from a consecutive sample of 270 functional capacity evaluations conducted on previously injured patients at an outpatient rehabilitation center. Patients were grouped by diagnosis. Three trials on each of up to eight isometric strength tests (two pushing, two pulling, and four lifting) were performed. CVs were calculated for each test for each subject. Mean CVs were then calculated for each subject for all tests completed. Mean CVs were also calculated for each test for all subjects who performed the test. Mean CVs on the various tests ranged from 6.1% to 12.0%. There was a significant difference in means between tests (p < .0001). Mean CVs between diagnostic groups were not different. No evidence was found to indicate that the CV can be used independently to determine sincerity of subject effort. CVs will vary depending on the specific test. CVs do not necessarily vary because of differing diagnoses. Judgments of sincerity of effort should not be made when based solely on the CV.

[1]  R. Burdett,et al.  Reliability of lsokinetic Muscle Endurance Tests. , 1987, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[2]  M E Robinson,et al.  Reproducibility of maximal versus submaximal efforts in an isometric lumbar extension task. , 1991, Journal of spinal disorders.

[3]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Preemployment strength testing: an updated position. , 1978, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[4]  S Carlsöö,et al.  With what degree of precision can voluntary static muscle force be repeated? , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  J. Egan.  A constitutive study of the age-dependent mechanical behaviour of deep articular cartilage: Model construction and simulated failure. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[7]  L W Douglass,et al.  Reliability of an isokinetic test of muscle strength and endurance. , 1989, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[8]  J. D. Whitley,et al.  Learning Component in Repetitive Maximal Static Contractions , 1968 .

[9]  J. Butler,et al.  Variability of routine pulmonary function tests. , 1975, Thorax.

[10]  R. Rogers,et al.  Changes in measured spirometric indices. What is significant? , 1981, Chest.

[11]  S. Halvorsen.  Effects of ACTH on erythropoiesis in the rabbit. , 1963, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Differentiation of maximal and submaximal knee extension efforts by isokinetic testing. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  Measurement of strength of hip joint muscles. , 1980, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  P. Harber,et al.  Static ergonomic strength testing in evaluating occupational back pain. , 1984, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[15]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Preemployment strength testing , 1978 .

[16]  D. Krebs,et al.  Reliability of eccentric isokinetic knee flexion and extension measurements. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Richard C. Nelson,et al.  Assessing Sincerity of Effort in Maximal Grip Strength Tests , 1989, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[18]  P. Kannus.  Normality, variability and predictability of work, power and torque acceleration energy with respect to peak torque in isokinetic muscle testing. , 1992, International journal of sports medicine.

[19]  G Tornvall,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL CAPABILITIES , 1963 .

[20]  E Knutsson,et al.  Isokinetic measurements of muscle strength in hysterical paresis. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[22]  R W Bohannon,et al.  DIFFERENTIATION OF MAXIMAL FROM SUBMAXIMAL STATIC ELBOW FLEXOR EFFORTS BY MEASUREMENT VARIABILITY , 1987, American journal of physical medicine.

[23]  A technique for measurements of plantar flexion torque with the Cybex II dynamometer. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[24]  R. Patterson,et al.  Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  Simple method to determine sincerity of effort during a maximal isometric test of grip strength. , 1983 .

[26]  Consistency of sincere and feigned grip exertions with repeated testing. , 1993, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[27]  B. Fleming,et al.  Test-retest variation in lifting capacity and indices of subject effort. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[28]  S. Fairburn,et al.  Concurrent validity of the ERGOS work simulator versus conventional functional capacity evaluation techniques in a workers' compensation population. , 1993, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.