Are the results of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction different during the "off" hours?

[1]  R. Califf,et al.  Metaanalysis of five reported studies on the relation of early coronary patency grades with mortality and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  R. Matthews,et al.  Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcome and hospital costs for low-volume and high-volume operators. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  R. Lange,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction: role of medical therapy versus primary PTCA. , 1995, Coronary artery disease.

[4]  D. Pryor,et al.  The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  W. Rogers,et al.  Comparison of primary angioplasty versus thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Alabama Registry of Myocardial Ischemia Investigators. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  J O'Keefe,et al.  A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1993 .

[7]  D. Le Guludec,et al.  Primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with contraindication to thrombolysis. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  A. Cohen-Solal,et al.  A patency-oriented strategy for early management of acute myocardial infarction using emergency coronary angiography and selective coronary angioplasty. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.