Are the results of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction different during the "off" hours?
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Garot | H. Benamer | P. Steg | J. Juliard
[1] R. Califf,et al. Metaanalysis of five reported studies on the relation of early coronary patency grades with mortality and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.
[2] R. Matthews,et al. Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcome and hospital costs for low-volume and high-volume operators. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.
[3] R. Lange,et al. Acute myocardial infarction: role of medical therapy versus primary PTCA. , 1995, Coronary artery disease.
[4] D. Pryor,et al. The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.
[5] W. Rogers,et al. Comparison of primary angioplasty versus thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Alabama Registry of Myocardial Ischemia Investigators. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.
[6] J O'Keefe,et al. A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1993 .
[7] D. Le Guludec,et al. Primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with contraindication to thrombolysis. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.
[8] A. Cohen-Solal,et al. A patency-oriented strategy for early management of acute myocardial infarction using emergency coronary angiography and selective coronary angioplasty. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.