Dialogue games: Conventions of human interaction

Natural dialogue does not proceed haphazardly; it has an easily recognized “episodic” structure and coherence which conform to a well developed set of conventions. This paper represents these conventions formally in terms related to speech act theory and to a theory of action.The major formal unit, the dialogue game, specifies aspects of the communication of both participants in a dialogue. We define the formal notion of dialogue games, and describe some of the important games of English. Dialogue games are conventions of interactive goal pursuit. Using them, each participant pursues his own goals in a way which sometimes serves the goals of the other. The idea of dialogue games can thus be seen as a part of a broader theoretical perspective which characterizes virtually all communication as goal pursuit activity.We also define and exemplify the property of Motivational Coherence of dialogues. Motivational Coherence can be used as an interpretive principle in explaining language comprehension.Actual dialogue games have a kind of causal connectedness which is not a consequence of their formal properties. This is explained in terms of a theory of action, which is also seen to explain a similar attribute of speech acts.

[1]  J. Austin How to do things with words , 1962 .

[2]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[3]  James Tromp Heringer,et al.  Some Grammatical Correlates of Felicity Conditions and Presuppositions , 1971 .

[4]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[5]  Alice Davison,et al.  Indirect Speech Acts and What to Do with Them , 1975 .

[6]  William C. Mann,et al.  Observation Methods for Human Dialogue. , 1975 .

[7]  R. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, and knowledge , 1975, IJCAI 1975.

[8]  William C Mann Dialogue-Based Research in Man-Machine Communication , 1975 .

[9]  William C. Mann An Assessment of Reliability of Dialogue-Annotation Instructions. , 1977 .

[10]  William C Mann Man-Machine Communication Research. , 1977 .

[11]  Robert C. Moore Reasoning About Knowledge and Action , 1977, IJCAI.

[12]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  Overview of 'Planning Speech Acts' , 1977, IJCAI.

[13]  James A. Moore,et al.  Dialogue-Games: Metacommunication Structures for Natural Language Interaction , 1977, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Andy Rogers Remarks on the Analysis of Assertion and the Conversational Role of Speech Acts , 1978 .

[15]  W. Mann,et al.  A Goal Oriented Model Of Human Dialogue , 1979, ACL Microfiche Series 1-83, Including Computational Linguistics.

[16]  John R. Searle,et al.  Expression and Meaning: Indirect speech acts , 1979 .

[17]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  Elements of a Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts , 1979, Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  Elements of a Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Alessandro Ferrara,et al.  An extended theory of speech acts: Appropriateness onditions for subordinate acts in sequences , 1980 .

[20]  Alessandro Ferrara,et al.  Appropriateness conditions for entire sequences of speech acts , 1980 .

[21]  Lauri Carlson Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis , 1982 .

[22]  The speech acts of arguing and convincing in externalized discussions. , 1982 .

[23]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Speech Acts and Rationality , 1985, ACL.

[24]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.