Multiobjective optimization of multi-cell sections for the crashworthiness design

Plastic deformation of structures absorbs substantial kinetic energy when impact occurs. For this reason, energy-absorbing components have been extensively used in the structural design of vehicles to intentionally absorb a large portion of crash energy to reduce the severe injury of occupants. On the other hand, high peak crushing force may to a certain extent indicate the risk of structural integrity and biomechanical damage of occupants. For this reason, it is of great significance to maximize the energy absorption and minimize the peak force by seeking for optimal design of these components. This paper aims to design the multi-cell cross-sectional thin-walled columns with these two crashworthiness criteria. An explicit finite element analysis (FEA) is used to derive higher-order response surfaces for these two objectives. Both the single-objective and multi-objective optimizations are performed for the single, double, triple and quadruple cell sectional columns under longitudinal impact loading. A comparative analysis is consequently given to explore the relationship between these two design criteria with the different optimization formulations.

[1]  H. R. Zarei,et al.  Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of circular aluminum tubes , 2006 .

[2]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  Axial Crushing of Multicorner Sheet Metal Columns , 1989 .

[3]  Masoud Rais-Rohani,et al.  A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization , 2005 .

[4]  Harold R. Lindman.  Analysis of Variance in Experimental Design , 1991 .

[5]  Koetsu Yamazaki,et al.  Maximization of the crushing energy absorption of tubes , 1998 .

[6]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  Relative merits of single-cell, multi-cell and foam-filled thin-walled structures in energy absorption , 2001 .

[7]  P. Papalambros,et al.  A NOTE ON WEIGHTED CRITERIA METHODS FOR COMPROMISE SOLUTIONS IN MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION , 1996 .

[8]  Larsgunnar Nilsson,et al.  Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization , 2006 .

[9]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation , 2001, DAC 2001.

[10]  Qing Li,et al.  Multiobjective optimization for crash safety design of vehicles using stepwise regression model , 2008 .

[11]  Soo-Ik Oh,et al.  Cylindrical tube optimization using response surface method based on stochastic process , 2002 .

[12]  G. Cheng,et al.  A comparative study of energy absorption characteristics of foam-filled and multi-cell square columns , 2007 .

[13]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Optimization of car body under constraints of noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH), and crash , 2001 .

[14]  Kaushik Sinha,et al.  Reliability-based multiobjective optimization for automotive crashworthiness and occupant safety , 2007 .

[15]  Hasan Kurtaran,et al.  Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations , 2002 .

[16]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[17]  Jerry I. Lin,et al.  Explicit algorithms for the nonlinear dynamics of shells , 1984 .

[18]  Heung-Soo Kim,et al.  New extruded multi-cell aluminum profile for maximum crash energy absorption and weight efficiency , 2002 .

[19]  Karen A. F. Copeland.  Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Ed. , 2001 .

[20]  Qing Li,et al.  Design optimization of regular hexagonal thin-walled columns with crashworthiness criteria , 2007 .

[21]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization , 2007 .

[22]  Tae Hee Lee,et al.  Multi-criteria shape optimization of a funnel in cathode ray tubes using a response surface model , 2005 .

[23]  L. Nilsson,et al.  On polynomial response surfaces and Kriging for use in structural optimization of crashworthiness , 2005 .

[24]  S Kleiven,et al.  Optimization of single skin surfaces for head injury prevention – a comparison of optima calculated for global versus local injury thresholds , 2003 .

[25]  Tomas Jansson,et al.  Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization – with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming , 2003 .

[26]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Impact analysis of I-Lam sandwich system for over-height collision protection of highway bridges , 2004 .

[27]  Marcus Redhe,et al.  Optimization of the new Saab 9-3 exposed to impact load using a space mapping technique , 2004 .

[28]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  On the Crushing Mechanics of Thin-Walled Structures , 1983 .

[29]  Massimiliano Avalle,et al.  Design optimization by response surface methodology: application to crashworthiness design of vehicle structures , 2002 .

[30]  M. Avalle,et al.  Maximisation of the crushing performance of a tubular device by shape optimisation , 2000 .