Association of Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day Risk-Standardized Mortality Rate With Long-term Survival After Heart Failure Hospitalization: An Analysis of the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure Registry

Importance Among patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF), the long-term clinical implications of hospitalization at hospitals based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) is not known. Objective To evaluate the association of hospital-specific 30-day RSMR with long-term survival among patients hospitalized with HF in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines–HF registry. Design, Setting, and Participants The longitudinal observational study included 106 304 patients with HF who were admitted to 317 centers participating in the Get With The Guidelines–HF registry from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2013, and had Medicare-linked follow-up data. Hospital-specific 30-day RSMR was calculated using a hierarchical logistic regression model. In the model, 30-day mortality rate was a binary outcome, patient baseline characteristics were included as covariates, and the hospitals were treated as random effects. The association of 30-day RSMR-based hospital groups (low to high 30-day RSMR: quartile 1 [Q1] to Q4) with long-term (1-year, 3-year, and 5-year) mortality was assessed using adjusted Cox models. Data analysis took place from June 29, 2017, to February 19, 2018. Exposures Thirty-day RSMR for participating hospitals. Main Outcomes and Measures One-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality rates. Results Of the 106 304 patients included in the analysis, 57 552 (54.1%) were women and 84 595 (79.6%) were white, and the median (interquartile range) age was 81 (74-87) years. The 30-day RSMR ranged from 8.6% (Q1) to 10.7% (Q4). Hospitals in the low 30-day RSMR group had greater availability of advanced HF therapies, cardiac surgery, and percutaneous coronary interventions. In the primary landmarked analyses among 30-day survivors, there was a graded inverse association between 30-day RSMR and long-term mortality (Q1 vs Q4: 5-year mortality, 73.7% vs 76.8%). In adjusted analysis, patients admitted to hospitals in the high 30-day RSMR group had 14% (95% CI, 10-18) higher relative hazards of 5-year mortality compared with those admitted to hospitals in the low 30-day RSMR group. Similar findings were observed in analyses of survival from admission, with 22% (95% CI, 18-26) higher relative hazards of 5-year mortality for patients admitted to Q4 vs Q1 hospitals. Conclusions and Relevance Lower hospital-level 30-day RSMR is associated with greater 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival for patients with HF. These differences in 30-day survival continued to accrue beyond 30 days and persisted long term, suggesting that 30-day RSMR may be a useful HF performance metric to incentivize quality care and improve long-term outcomes.

[1]  A. Ibrahim,et al.  Association of Coded Severity With Readmission Reduction After the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program , 2017, JAMA internal medicine.

[2]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Implementation With Readmission and Mortality Outcomes in Heart Failure , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[3]  C. Yancy,et al.  The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program Is Associated With Fewer Readmissions, More Deaths: Time to Reconsider. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Leora I. Horwitz,et al.  Association of Changing Hospital Readmission Rates With Mortality Rates After Hospital Discharge , 2017, JAMA.

[5]  A. Pandey,et al.  Association of US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital 30-Day Risk-Standardized Readmission Metric With Care Quality and Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry/Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Regis , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[6]  R. Hayward,et al.  Association Between Medicare Hospital Readmission Penalties and 30-Day Combined Excess Readmission and Mortality , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[7]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Association of 30-Day Readmission Metric for Heart Failure Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Quality of Care and Outcomes. , 2016, JACC. Heart failure.

[8]  Neel M. Butala,et al.  Life Expectancy after Myocardial Infarction, According to Hospital Performance. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Konstam,et al.  Sisyphus and 30-Day Heart Failure Readmissions: Futility in Predicting a Flawed Outcome Metric. , 2016, JACC. Heart failure.

[10]  Joel Stein,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2014, Circulation.

[11]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services,et al.  Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and Fiscal Year 2014 rates; quality reporting requirements for specific providers; hospital conditions of participation; payment policies related to pa , 2013, Federal register.

[12]  Kevin G Volpp,et al.  Limits of readmission rates in measuring hospital quality suggest the need for added metrics. , 2013, Health affairs.

[13]  A. Jha,et al.  Thirty-day readmissions--truth and consequences. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  S. Normand,et al.  Comparison of Hospital Risk-Standardized Mortality Rates Calculated by Using In-Hospital and 30-Day Models: An Observational Study With Implications for Hospital Profiling , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Representativeness of a National Heart Failure Quality-of-Care Registry: Comparison of OPTIMIZE-HF and Non–OPTIMIZE-HF Medicare Patients , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[16]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers. , 2009, American heart journal.

[17]  Yuling Hong,et al.  Overview of the American Heart Association "Get with the Guidelines" programs: coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. , 2006, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[18]  Lynn A Smaha,et al.  The American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines program. , 2004, American heart journal.