Beware Thy Bias: Scaling Mobile Phone Data to Measure Traffic Intensities

Mobile phone data are a novel data source to generate mobility information from Call Detail Records (CDRs). Although mobile phone data can provide us with valuable insights in human mobility, they often show a biased picture of the traveling population. This research, therefore, focuses on correcting for these biases and suggests a new method to scale mobile phone data to the true traveling population. Moreover, the scaled mobile phone data will be compared to roadside measurements at 100 different locations on Dutch highways. We infer vehicle trips from the mobile phone data and compare the scaled counts with roadside measurements. The results are evaluated for October 2015. The proposed scaling method shows very promising results with near identical vehicle counts from both data sources in terms of monthly, weekly, and hourly vehicle counts. This indicates the scaling method, in combination with mobile phone data, is able to correctly measure traffic intensities on highways, and thereby able to anticipate calibrated human mobility behaviour. Nevertheless, there are still some discrepancies—for one, during weekends—calling for more research. This paper serves researchers in the field of mobile phone data by providing a proven method to scale the sample to the population, a crucial step in creating unbiased mobility information.

[1]  Marta C. González,et al.  The path most traveled: Travel demand estimation using big data resources , 2015, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[2]  Yee Leung,et al.  Applying mobile phone data to travel behaviour research: A literature review , 2017 .

[3]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[4]  Ramón Cáceres,et al.  A Tale of One City: Using Cellular Network Data for Urban Planning , 2011, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[5]  Johan Wideberg,et al.  Deriving origin destination data from a mobile phone network , 2007 .

[6]  Raquel Barco,et al.  Traffic Monitoring via Mobile Device Location , 2019, Sensors.

[7]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[8]  K. Fiedler Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. , 2000, Psychological review.

[9]  Rein Ahas,et al.  Evaluating passive mobile positioning data for tourism surveys: An Estonian case study , 2008 .

[10]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[11]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  The sociability score: App-based social profiling from a healthcare perspective , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Modelling Transport: Ortúzar/Modelling Transport , 2011 .

[13]  Awais Ahmad,et al.  IoT-Based Big Data: From Smart City towards Next Generation Super City Planning , 2017, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[14]  Luis M. Romero,et al.  Exploring strengths and weaknesses of mobility inference from mobile phone data vs. travel surveys , 2020 .

[15]  SpruitMarco,et al.  The sociability score , 2016 .

[16]  G. Wets,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Weather on Traffic Intensity , 2010 .

[17]  Pu Wang,et al.  Development of origin–destination matrices using mobile phone call data , 2014 .

[18]  Carlo G. Prato,et al.  Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directions , 2009 .