Immense changes in traffic – Considerable stability in discourses. Road speed in Danish parliamentary documents 1900–2010

Research on road safety acknowledges speed as having a major impact on both the number and severity of road crashes, and this seems to have been translated into policies. However, a closer look reveals that the societal debate and political context also seem to play a major role in the way road safety policies are shaped. Yet, the knowledge on the political discourse regarding speeding and speed management is scarce. In this paper, we analyze the ways speed has been managed and legislated in transport policymaking by studying Danish parliamentary documents from 1903 through 2010. Analyzing the material qualitatively in two phases, first, we looked for notable policy shifts in the material, and consequently identified five historical periods. Second, we analyzed these periods in more detail, and identified and analyzed four repetitive discourses about speed across them, which were as follows: speed, individual rights and responsibilities; speed and safety; speed, policy measures, and law enforcement; and speed and other societal goals. While the transport system has undergone a massive change during the last 100 years, we found a considerable stability in the discourses regarding speed policies. The themes and patterns we distinguished in the documents occurred repeatedly. Certain discourses are strongly connected to the way speed is discussed and governed, and these are likely to emerge when speed policies are taken up in the parliamentary context. We conclude that in addition to the current prominent discourses, past discourses may have a strong influence on the way safety measures and policies are being understood and accepted.

[1]  D. Barry,et al.  Strategy Retold: Toward a Narrative View of Strategic Discourse , 1997 .

[2]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Why some road safety problems are more difficult to solve than others. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Rune Elvik,et al.  A restatement of the case for speed limits , 2010 .

[4]  B. Peters Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism , 1999 .

[5]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Discovering the future of the case study method in evaluation research , 1994 .

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[7]  R Elvik,et al.  Barriers to the use of efficiency assessment tools in road safety policy , 2005 .

[8]  Geert Teisman,et al.  Models For Research into Decision-MakingProcesses: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds , 2000 .

[9]  Tomas Svensson,et al.  The politics of speed – local and regional actors’ views on speed limits, traffic safety and mobility in Sweden , 2014 .

[10]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Knowledge Utilisation in Road Safety Policy: Barriers to the Use of Knowledge from Economic Analysis , 2009 .

[11]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The barely revealed preference behind road investment priorities , 1997 .

[12]  Ruediger Lamm,et al.  INCREASE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY BY SURVEILLANCE OF SPEED LIMITS WITH AUTOMATIC RADAR DEVICES ON A DANGEROUS SECTION OF A GERMAN AUTOBAHN: A LONG-TERM INVESTIGATION , 1984 .

[13]  Lisa A Bero,et al.  "Developing good taste in evidence": facilitators of and hindrances to evidence-informed health policymaking in state government. , 2008, The Milbank quarterly.

[14]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .

[15]  Kathrin Frey,et al.  Revising Road Safety Policy: The Role of Systematic Evidence in Switzerland , 2010 .

[16]  T. Tyler Why People Obey the Law , 2021 .

[17]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Exceptional condition of police enforcement: Driving speeds during the police strike , 1980 .

[18]  M. Foucault The archaeology of knowledge , 1970 .

[19]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Optimal Speed Limits: Limits of Optimality Models , 2002 .

[20]  Kurt Jacobsen Velfærdens pris: Arbejderbeskyttelse og arbejdsmiljø gennem 150 år , 2011 .

[21]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Speed and road accidents : an evaluation of the power model , 2004 .

[22]  W. Powell Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis , 1991 .

[23]  Carlyn Muir,et al.  Eliminating Serious Injury and Death from Road Transport: A Crisis of Complacency , 2013 .

[24]  Brendan Gleeson,et al.  Making Believe: Institutional and Discursive Barriers to Sustainable Transport in Two Australian Cities , 2003 .

[25]  Rune Elvik Speed and Road Safety: Synthesis of Evidence from Evaluation Studies , 2005 .

[26]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .