Multistatic radar: System requirements and experimental validation

Multistatic radar provides many advantages over conventional monostatic radar, such as enhanced information on target signatures and improvements in detection which are due to the multiple perspectives and differences in the properties of clutter. Furthermore, the fact that receive-only multistatic nodes are passive may be an advantage in military applications. In order to quantify potential performance benefits of these advantages a comprehensive understanding of target and clutter behaviour in multistatic scenarios is necessary. However, such information is currently limited because bistatic and multistatic measurements are difficult to make, their results depend on many variables such as multistatic geometry, frequency, polarization, and many others, and results from previous measurements are likely to be classified for military targets. Multistatic measurements of targets and clutter have been performed over the past few years by the NetRAD system developed at the University College London and the University of Cape Town. A new system, NeXtRAD, is now being developed in order to investigate some of the many aspects of multistatic radar. This paper discusses the results obtained with the previous system and the lessons learnt from its use. These points are then discussed in the context of the new radar, defining key important factors that have to be considered when developing a new multistatic radar system.

[1]  Hugh Griffiths,et al.  The design and development of an experimental netted radar system , 2003, 2003 Proceedings of the International Conference on Radar (IEEE Cat. No.03EX695).

[2]  M.R. Inggs,et al.  Evaluation of coherent netted radar carrier stability while synchronised with GPS-disciplined oscillators , 2011, 2011 IEEE RadarCon (RADAR).

[3]  Michael R. Inggs,et al.  Multistatic networked radar for sea clutter measurements , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[4]  W. Al-Ashwal Measurement and modelling of bistatic sea clutter , 2011 .

[5]  Michael Inggs,et al.  A common view GPSDO to synchronize netted radar , 2007 .

[6]  H. Griffiths,et al.  Statistical analysis of simultaneous monostatic and bistatic sea clutter at low grazing angles , 2011 .

[7]  Shaun Raymond Doughty Development and performance evaluation of a multistatic radar system , 2008 .

[8]  K. D. Ward,et al.  Measurement and modelling of bistatic radar sea clutter , 2010 .

[9]  Chris Baker,et al.  Design and evaluation of a low-cost multistatic netted radar system , 2007 .

[10]  Simon Scott RHINO: reconfigurable hardware interface for computation and radio , 2011 .

[11]  Michael Inggs,et al.  Growing horns: Applying the Rhino software defined radio system to radar , 2011, 2011 IEEE RadarCon (RADAR).

[12]  Gabriel Lellouch,et al.  Multi-carrier Based Radar Signal Optimization Using Genetic Algorithm , 2013, SocProS.

[13]  Gordon Inggs Putting the pieces together: the systematic development of a software defined radio toolflow for the Rhino project , 2011 .

[14]  Michael R. Inggs,et al.  NetRAD multistatic sea clutter database , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[15]  Michael Inggs,et al.  NeXtRAD and RHINO radar: Harnessing the herd for networked radar , 2014, 2014 International Radar Conference.