Differential expression of hypoxia and (lymph)angiogenesis-related genes at different metastatic sites in breast cancer

IntroductionBreast cancer can metastasize via lymphatic and hematogenous pathways. Hypoxia and (lymph)angiogenesis are closely related processes that play a pivotal role in the tumor progression and metastasis. The aim of this study was to compare expression of hypoxia and (lymph)angiogenesis-related genes between primary breast tumors and metastases in different tissues.Materials and methodsA gene list of 269 hypoxia and (lymph)angiogenesis-related genes was composed and validated using Onto-Express, Pathway-express and Ingenuity software. The expression of these genes was compared in microarray data of 62 samples of primary tumors and metastases of 31 patients with breast cancer retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus. Similarity between samples was investigated using unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis, principal component analysis and permutation testing. Differential gene expression between primary tumors and metastases and between metastases from different organs was analyzed using Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney statistics.ResultsUnsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis demonstrated that hypoxia and (lymph)angiogenesis-related gene expression was more similar between samples from the same patient, than between samples from the same organ. Principal component analysis indicated that 22.7% and 7.0% of the total variation in the gene list was respectively patient and organ related. When differences in gene expression were studied between different organs, liver metastases seemed to differ most from the other secondary sites. Some of the best characterized molecules differentially expressed were VEGFA, PDGFRB, FGF4, TIMP1, TGFB-R1 and collagen 18A1 (precursor of endostatin). To confirm the results of these experiments at the protein level, immunohistochemical experiments were performed with antibodies for VEGFA and MMP-2.ConclusionsOur results suggest that hypoxia and (lymph)angiogenesis-related gene expression is more dependent on the characteristics of the primary tumor than on the characteristics of the organs that bear the metastasis. However, when different organs are compared, the expression in liver metastases differs most from other metastatic sites and primary tumors, possibly due to organ-specific angiogenic and lymphangiogenic responses to metastasis-related hypoxia.

[1]  J. Loscalzo,et al.  Endothelial cells in physiology and in the pathophysiology of vascular disorders. , 1998, Blood.

[2]  A. Harris,et al.  Prognostic significance of a novel hypoxia-regulated marker, carbonic anhydrase IX, in invasive breast carcinoma. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Thomas Hawighorst,et al.  Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[4]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Levels of hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α independently predict prognosis in patients with lymph node negative breast carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[5]  Misa Nakamura,et al.  Lymph vessel density correlates with nodal status, VEGF-C expression, and prognosis in breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[6]  H. Augustin,et al.  Differentiation of endothelial cells: Analysis of the constitutive and activated endothelial cell phenotypes , 1994, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[7]  M. Peeters,et al.  Limited influences of chemotherapy on healthy and metastatic liver parenchyma. , 2005, World journal of gastroenterology.

[8]  H. Dai,et al.  No common denominator for breast cancer lymph node metastasis , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  C. Perou,et al.  Molecular portraits and 70-gene prognosis signature are preserved throughout the metastatic process of breast cancer. , 2005, Cancer research.

[10]  M. Déry,et al.  Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: regulation by hypoxic and non-hypoxic activators. , 2005, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[11]  Zhiyuan Hu,et al.  Classification and risk stratification of invasive breast carcinomas using a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[12]  David Botstein,et al.  Endothelial cell diversity revealed by global expression profiling , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Annuska M Glas,et al.  Gene expression profiles of primary breast tumors maintained in distant metastases , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  N. Weidner,et al.  Tumor microvessel density, p53 expression, tumor size, and peritumoral lymphatic vessel invasion are relevant prognostic markers in node-negative breast carcinoma. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Gene Expression Programs in Response to Hypoxia: Cell Type Specificity and Prognostic Significance in Human Cancers , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[16]  A. Nobel,et al.  The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[17]  R. Henriksson,et al.  Correlation of vascular endothelial growth factor content with recurrences, survival, and first relapse site in primary node-positive breast carcinoma after adjuvant treatment. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Chan Zeng,et al.  Human lung project: evaluating variance of gene expression in the human lung. , 2006, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[19]  Andrea Bild,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles of Multiple Breast Cancer Phenotypes and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  E. van Marck,et al.  The Presence of a Fibrotic Focus in Invasive Breast Carcinoma Correlates with the Expression of Carbonic Anhydrase IX and is a Marker of Hypoxia and Poor Prognosis , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  C. Colpaert,et al.  Cutaneous breast cancer deposits show distinct growth patterns with different degrees of angiogenesis, hypoxia and fibrin deposition , 2003, Histopathology.

[22]  E. van Marck,et al.  Breast adenocarcinoma liver metastases, in contrast to colorectal cancer liver metastases, display a non-angiogenic growth pattern that preserves the stroma and lacks hypoxia , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  D. Melton,et al.  Endothelial signaling during development , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[24]  Zhiyuan Hu,et al.  Estrogen-regulated genes predict survival in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  P. Heikkilä,et al.  High LYVE-1–Positive Lymphatic Vessel Numbers Are Associated with Poor Outcome in Breast Cancer , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  M. Schindl,et al.  Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in lymph node-positive breast cancer. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[27]  Delphine A. Lacorre,et al.  Plasticity of endothelial cells: rapid dedifferentiation of freshly isolated high endothelial venule endothelial cells outside the lymphoid tissue microenvironment. , 2004, Blood.

[28]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[29]  W. Risau Differentiation of endothelium , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[30]  S. Fox,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis in node-negative breast carcinomas — relationship with epidermal growth factor receptor, estrogen receptor, and survival , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[31]  Angiogenesis and hypoxia in lymph node metastases is predicted by the angiogenesis and hypoxia in the primary tumour in patients with breast cancer , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  A. Harris,et al.  Angiogenesis, assessed by platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule antibodies, as indicator of node metastases and survival in breast cancer , 1992, The Lancet.

[33]  T. Springer,et al.  High endothelial venules (HEVs): specialized endothelium for lymphocyte migration. , 1995, Immunology today.

[34]  J. Folkman,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.