Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning

With the digitalisation of education increasing, the relationship between student engagement in Technology-enhanced Learning (TEL) and digital skills has remained largely unexplored. There is a strong consensus that engagement is necessary for students to succeed in school. We hypothesised that students reporting high and low levels of general engagement display differences in terms of their engagement in TEL, and that students’ digital skills correlate with their engagement in and disengagement in TEL, which in turn is related to their learning outcomes. We used statistical tests to explore the relationship between the students’ ( N  = 410) general engagement and engagement in TEL, and investigated how digital skills were related to engagement and disengagement in TEL. We found significant correlations between students’ digital skills and engagement in TEL, showing that the possession of high levels of digital skill is related to engagement in TEL. Interestingly, digital skills were not related to disengagement. This suggests that students reporting both high and low levels of digital skills disengage to some extent when learning with technologies. We also identified variables reflecting both engagement and disengagement in TEL that predict student performance as measured via final grades, implying that in order to understand and support students who learn with technologies, a broader understanding of the factors influencing engagement and disengagement is key.

[1]  Katariina Salmela-Aro,et al.  School burnout and engagement profiles among digital natives in Finland: a person-oriented approach , 2016, Bildung-Psychology.

[2]  K. Salmela‐Aro,et al.  The Dark Side of Internet Use: Two Longitudinal Studies of Excessive Internet Use, Depressive Symptoms, School Burnout and Engagement Among Finnish Early and Late Adolescents , 2016, Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

[3]  Kurt De Wit,et al.  ICT learning experience and research orientation as predictors of ICT skills and the ICT use of university students , 2014, Education and Information Technologies.

[4]  Charles R. Graham.  BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEMS: DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005 .

[5]  Denise Leahy,et al.  Digital Literacy: A Vital Competence for 2010? , 2010, Key Competencies in the Knowledge Society.

[6]  Paul A. Gore,et al.  11 – Cluster Analysis , 2000 .

[7]  Feifei Ye,et al.  The Math and Science Engagement Scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties , 2016 .

[8]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the Effectiveness of the OLI Statistics Course in Accelerating Student Learning. , 2008 .

[9]  J. Reeve.  How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. , 2013 .

[10]  Hae-Deok Song,et al.  The Relationships of Family, Perceived Digital Competence and Attitude, and Learning Agility in Sustainable Student Engagement in Higher Education , 2018, Sustainability.

[11]  J. Fraillon,et al.  Preparing for Life in a Digital Age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report , 2014 .

[12]  J. Fraillon,et al.  Preparing for life in a digital age , 2014 .

[13]  J. Finn,et al.  Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? , 2012 .

[14]  J. Finn,et al.  Participation and Withdrawal Among Fourth-Grade Pupils , 1992 .

[15]  S. Christenson,et al.  Jingle, Jangle, 1 and Conceptual Haziness 2 : Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct , 2012 .

[16]  Meri-Tuulia Kaarakainen,et al.  Performance-based testing for ICT skills assessing: a case study of students and teachers’ ICT skills in Finnish schools , 2017, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[17]  E. Skinner,et al.  Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience , 2012 .

[18]  Ola Knutsson,et al.  The Use of Learning Technologies and Student Engagement in Learning Activities , 2018, Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy.

[19]  ChristophGabriela,et al.  Moving beyond cognitive elements of ICT literacy , 2015 .

[20]  Ming-Te Wang,et al.  Part I Commentary: So What Is Student Engagement Anyway? , 2012 .

[21]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Learning With Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Literature Review of Computer Self-Efficacy , 2009 .

[22]  J. V. Dijk.  Digital Divide: Impact of Access , 2017 .

[23]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Exploring the potential of LMS log data as a proxy measure of student engagement , 2017, Journal of Computing in Higher Education.

[24]  R. Säljö.  Lärande i praktiken : ett sociokulturellt perspektiv , 2005 .

[25]  Terry Judd,et al.  The rise and fall (?) of the digital natives , 2018, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

[26]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[27]  Ulf Kröhne,et al.  Moving beyond cognitive elements of ICT literacy: First evidence on the structure of ICT engagement , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  R. Balfanz,et al.  Preventing Student Disengagement and Keeping Students on the Graduation Path in Urban Middle-Grades Schools: Early Identification and Effective Interventions , 2007 .

[29]  Ming-Te Wang,et al.  Beyond Classroom Academics: A School-Wide and Multi-Contextual Perspective on Student Engagement in School , 2019, Adolescent Research Review.

[30]  P. McGee,et al.  Blended Course Design: A Synthesis of Best Practices , 2012 .

[31]  Redecker Christine,et al.  European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators:DigCompEdu , 2017 .

[32]  Ola Knutsson,et al.  Designing for Engagement in TEL – a Teacher-Researcher Collaboration , 2018, Designs for Learning.

[33]  Juana María Sancho Gil,et al.  Promoting digital competence in secondary education: are schools there? Insights from a case study , 2016 .

[34]  Ellen A. Skinner,et al.  Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. , 2009 .

[35]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Chris Campbell,et al.  Assessing the dimensionality and educational impacts of integrated ICT literacy in the higher education context , 2017 .

[37]  Jalal Nouri,et al.  Students Multimodal Literacy and Design of Learning During Self-Studies in Higher Education , 2019, Technol. Knowl. Learn..

[38]  Ove Edvard Hatlevik,et al.  Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[39]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[40]  Kai Hakkarainen,et al.  Beyond screen time: Multidimensionality of socio-digital participation and relations to academic well-being in three educational phases , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Ola Knutsson,et al.  Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school , 2020, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching 2nd Edition: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies , 2002 .

[43]  Xibin Han,et al.  Initial Development Process of a Student Engagement Scale in Blended Learning Environment , 2017, 2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT).

[44]  Teresa Correa.  Digital skills and social media use: how Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’ , 2016 .

[45]  Lisa R. Halverson.  Conceptualizing Blended Learning Engagement , 2016 .

[46]  Feifei Ye,et al.  Conceptualization and Assessment of Adolescents’ Engagement and Disengagement in School , 2019, European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

[47]  Jef Verhoeven,et al.  Exploring the Self-Reported ICT Skill Levels of Undergraduate Science Students , 2016, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res..

[48]  John Tafelski,et al.  The Cost of Disengagement: Examining the Real Story of Absenteeism in Two Michigan Counties. , 2016 .

[49]  R. J. Repique.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[50]  G. Petsko.  The dark side , 2000, Genome Biology.

[51]  María I. Loaiza-Aguirre,et al.  Determination of the Innovative Capacity of Ecuadorian Universities , 2017 .

[52]  Ulli Samuelsson,et al.  Digital (o)jämlikhet IKT-användning i skolan och elevers tekniska kapital , 2014 .

[53]  Nadire Cavus,et al.  The efficient virtual learning environment: A case study of web 2.0 tools and Windows live spaces , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[54]  Irvin R. Katz,et al.  Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy: Integration and Assessment in Higher Education , 2007 .

[55]  Candace Thille.  Open Learning Initiative , 2013 .

[56]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd Edition , 1993 .

[57]  N. Selwyn,et al.  What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning , 2017 .

[58]  NussbaumMiguel,et al.  Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile , 2012 .

[59]  Johan van Braak,et al.  Accuracy and bias of ICT self-efficacy: An empirical study into students' over- and underestimation of their ICT competences , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[60]  King Luu,et al.  An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[61]  Wan Ng,et al.  Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[62]  Kurt De Wit,et al.  Changes in the basic ICT skills of freshmen between 2005 and 2009: Who’s catching up and who’s still behind? , 2011, Education and Information Technologies.

[63]  Frank Goldhammer,et al.  ICT Engagement in Learning Environments , 2016 .

[64]  Curtis R. Henrie.  Measuring Student Engagement in Technology-Mediated Learning Environments. , 2016 .

[65]  Ove Edvard Hatlevik,et al.  Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self-efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[66]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using Ibm Spss Statistics , 2017 .

[67]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .