Structural plasticity of a transmembrane peptide allows self-assembly into biologically active nanoparticles

Significant efforts have been devoted to the development of nanoparticular delivering systems targeting tumors. However, clinical application of nanoparticles is hampered by insufficient size homogeneity, difficulties in reproducible synthesis and manufacturing, frequent high uptake in the liver, systemic toxicity of the carriers (particularly for inorganic nanoparticles), and insufficient selectivity for tumor cells. We have found that properly modified synthetic analogs of transmembrane domains of membrane proteins can self-assemble into remarkably uniform spherical nanoparticles with innate biological activity. Self-assembly is driven by a structural transition of the peptide that adopts predominantly a beta-hairpin conformation in aqueous solutions, but folds into an alpha-helix upon spontaneous fusion of the nanoparticles with cell membrane. A 24-amino acid peptide corresponding to the second transmembrane helix of the CXCR4 forms self-assembled particles that inhibit CXCR4 function in vitro and hamper CXCR4-dependent tumor metastasis in vivo. Furthermore, such nanoparticles can encapsulate hydrophobic drugs, thus providing a delivery system with the potential for dual biological activity.

[1]  P. Roy,et al.  Virus‑like particles as a vaccine delivery system: Myths and facts , 2008, Human vaccines.

[2]  V. Lee,et al.  Chemokine receptors as targets for cancer therapy. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical design.

[3]  Xiaojun Zhao,et al.  Molecular designer self-assembling peptides. , 2006, Chemical Society reviews.

[4]  J. Bowie,et al.  A Transmembrane Segment Mimic Derived from Escherichia coli Diacylglycerol Kinase Inhibits Protein Activity* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  Samuel I Stupp,et al.  Simultaneous self-assembly, orientation, and patterning of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers by soft lithography. , 2007, Nano letters.

[6]  Michel Bouvier,et al.  A Peptide Derived from a β2-Adrenergic Receptor Transmembrane Domain Inhibits Both Receptor Dimerization and Activation* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Michel Bouvier,et al.  Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer Reveals Ligand-induced Conformational Changes in CXCR4 Homo- and Heterodimers* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  A. Schousboe,et al.  Neurotransmitter transporters: molecular function of important drug targets. , 2006, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[9]  Robert Langer,et al.  New frontiers in nanotechnology for cancer treatment. , 2008, Urologic oncology.

[10]  K. D. Collins,et al.  Charge density-dependent strength of hydration and biological structure. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Mark B Gerstein,et al.  Computational analysis of membrane proteins: the largest class of drug targets. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[12]  J. Ávalos,et al.  Transport properties of dimethyl sulfoxide aqueous solutions , 2003 .

[13]  Helgi B. Schiöth,et al.  Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  D. Pochan,et al.  Laminated morphology of nontwisting beta-sheet fibrils constructed via peptide self-assembly. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  L. Rajendran,et al.  Subcellular targeting strategies for drug design and delivery , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[16]  S. Tarasov,et al.  Bisimidazoacridones: Effect of Molecular Environment on Conformation and Photophysical Properties , 1999, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[17]  Sonny C. Hsiao,et al.  Genome-free viral capsids as multivalent carriers for taxol delivery. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[18]  D. Pochan,et al.  Light-activated hydrogel formation via the triggered folding and self-assembly of a designed peptide. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  C. Semino Self-assembling Peptides: From Bio-inspired Materials to Bone Regeneration , 2008, Journal of dental research.

[20]  James R Heath,et al.  Nanotechnology and cancer. , 2008, Annual review of medicine.

[21]  I. Tannock,et al.  Drug penetration in solid tumours , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  L. Zhang,et al.  Nanoparticles in Medicine: Therapeutic Applications and Developments , 2008, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[23]  M. Gottesman,et al.  Transmembrane inhibitors of P-glycoprotein, an ABC transporter. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[24]  Gregory A Caputo,et al.  Supporting Online Material for Computational Design of Peptides That Target Transmembrane Helices , 2007 .

[25]  J. Casas-Finet,et al.  Bisimidazoacridones: 2. Steady-state and Time-resolved Fluorescence Studies of Their Diverse Interactions with DNA¶,§ , 2003, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[26]  B. Collins A trick of the light: Novel technologies for sizing liposomal drug-delivery particles , 2006 .

[27]  Dai Fukumura,et al.  Multistage nanoparticle delivery system for deep penetration into tumor tissue , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  N. Tarasova,et al.  Inhibition of G-protein-coupled Receptor Function by Disruption of Transmembrane Domain Interactions* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  Ehud Gazit,et al.  Self-assembled peptide nanostructures: the design of molecular building blocks and their technological utilization. , 2007, Chemical Society reviews.

[30]  P. Seeman,et al.  A Transmembrane Domain-derived Peptide Inhibits D1 Dopamine Receptor Function without Affecting Receptor Oligomerization* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.