Where Should Implants Be Anchored in the Humeral Head?

To determine histomorphometric and bone strength distribution of the proximal humerus, analyses were done on 24 freshly harvested human cadaveric humeri. Median ages of 46 and 69 years were recorded respectively for the male group (n = 11; minimum, 34 years; maximum, 76 years) and the female group (n = 13; minimum, 46 years; maximum, 90 years). The humeral head was sliced into four equal horizontal levels (Levels 1–4). Five regions of interest were defined in each cutting plane: anterior, posterior, lateral, medial, and central. Histomorphometric analyses evaluated structural parameters (tissue volume to bone volume ratio, trabecular thickness), connectivity (number of nodes, node to node length), and trabecular orientation (mean bone length). The peak values of histomorphometric parameters and bone strength were identified for the cranial section and decreased caudally. The medial and dorsal aspects of the proximal humeral head were found to be the areas of highest bone strength. The trabecular network formed a pattern that connected the center of the gleaned cavity. The structural and connectivity parameters, bone strength, and trabecular orientation showed region- and level-related characteristics. Knowledge of distribution, microstructure, and quality of bone in the humeral head allows the remaining bone stock to be used effectively, even in elderly patients, with a minimally invasive approach and maximum mechanical stability.

[1]  Michael Hahn,et al.  Architecture and distribution of cancellous bone yield vertebral fracture clues , 1996, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[2]  E Schneider,et al.  Structure and Function of Vertebral Trabecular Bone , 1997, Spine.

[3]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  H. Frost Changing Views about ‘Osteoporoses’ (a 1998 Overview) , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[5]  J S Thomsen,et al.  A new method of comprehensive static histomorphometry applied on human lumbar vertebral cancellous bone. , 2000, Bone.

[6]  Schneider,et al.  Star length distribution: a volume‐based concept for the characterization of structural anisotropy , 1998, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  D Mitton,et al.  Mechanical properties of ewe vertebral cancellous bone compared with histomorphometry and high-resolution computed tomography parameters. , 1998, Bone.

[8]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. , 1999, Bone.

[9]  G. V. B. Cochran,et al.  Relationships between bone structure in the iliac crest and bone structure and strength in the lumbar spine , 1993, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  H. Lill,et al.  Proximale und distale Humerusfrakturen im hohen Alter , 2000, Der Orthopäde.

[11]  H. Uhthoff,et al.  Pattern of bone loss of the proximal femur: A radiologic, densitometric, and histomorphometric study , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  D. Mitton,et al.  High-Resolution Computed Tomography for Architectural Characterization of Human Lumbar Cancellous Bone: Relationships with Histomorphometry and Biomechanics , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[13]  F Melsen,et al.  Primary hyperparathyroidism: iliac crest trabecular bone volume, structure, remodeling, and balance evaluated by histomorphometric methods. , 1992, Bone.

[14]  A. Parfitt,et al.  Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Delling [Age-dependent bone changes (author's transl)]. , 1974, Klinische Wochenschrift.

[16]  I. Hvid,et al.  Quantification of age-related changes in the structure model type and trabecular thickness of human tibial cancellous bone. , 2000, Bone.

[17]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Age-related changes in bone mass, structure, and strength – effects of loading , 2000, Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie.

[18]  H. Takahashi,et al.  A Morphometric Comparison of Trabecular Structure of Human Ilium Between Microcomputed Tomography and Conventional Histomorphometry , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[19]  A M Schott,et al.  Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass?: a two-dimensional histomorphometric study. , 1995, Bone.

[20]  P Zioupos,et al.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[21]  W. Alexander,et al.  The American society for bone and mineral research , 1987, Steroids.

[22]  M. Amling,et al.  Biomechanical stability of the skeleton--it is not only bone mass, but also bone structure that counts. , 1995, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.