Abstract. The two occupational groups most likely to vote for populist right parties in Western Europe in the 1990s also disagree the most over issues relating to the economic dimension of politics. The two groups were: blue-collar workers – who support extensive state intervention in the economy – and owners of small businesses – who are against such state intervention. Proponents of economic realignment theories have held that both groups voted for the populist right because their economic preferences became aligned in recent decades. This article analyzes more detailed comparative data than has previously been available in the two cases held to be most propitious for the realignment hypotheses – France and Denmark – and finds strong evidence against them. The key mechanism for bringing together voters who disagree on state intervention in the economy is the populist right's appeal on issues cross-cutting the economic dimension, and these voters’ willingness to grant such issues pre-eminence over economic ones. As a result, it is argued, populist right parties in Western Europe are limited by or vulnerable to the salience of the economic dimension.
[1]
Wouter Van Der Brug Meindert Fennema.
Protest or mainstream? How the European anti-immigrant parties developed into two separate groups by 19991
,
2003
.
[2]
W. Müller.
Evil or the ‘Engine of Democracy’?Populism and Party Competition in Austria
,
2002
.
[3]
Torben Iversen.
The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion
,
2001
.
[4]
M. Lubbers.
Exclusionistic electorates: extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe
,
2001
.
[5]
Cas Mudde,et al.
The Single-Issue Party Thesis: Extreme Right Parties and the Immigration Issue
,
1999
.
[6]
G. Esping‐Andersen.
Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism: Politics without Class: Postindustrial Cleavages in Europe and America
,
1999
.
[7]
G. Steinmetz.
The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis.Herbert Kitschelt , Anthony J. McGann
,
1997
.
[8]
P. Ignazi.
The silent counter‐revolution
,
1992
.