Lessons from the Logic of Demonstratives: what indexicality teaches us about logic, and vice versa
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] David Kaplan,et al. What is Russell’s Theory of Descriptions? , 1970 .
[2] David Kaplan. Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals , 1989 .
[3] Greg Restall,et al. Barriers to Implication , 2010 .
[4] J. King. Tense, modality, and semantic values , 2003 .
[5] Gillian Russell,et al. Indexicals, context-sensitivity and the failure of implication , 2011, Synthese.
[6] Gillian Russell. A New Problem for the Linguistic Doctrine of Necessary Truth , 2010 .
[7] J. Etchemendy. The Concept of Logical Consequence , 1991 .
[8] Richard E. Olson. On Truth by Convention , 1975 .
[9] J. Perry. The Problem Of The Essential Indexical , 1979 .
[10] Mario Gómez-Torrente. On a fallacy attributed to tarski , 1998 .
[12] An intermediate logic , 1928 .
[13] H. Castañeda. On the Logic of Attributions of Self-Knowledge to Others , 1968 .
[14] Howard K. Wettstein,et al. Themes from Kaplan , 1989 .
[15] Tomoyuki Yamada,et al. The Epistemic Closure Principle and the Assessment Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions , 2014 .
[16] Emma Borg,et al. Complex Demonstratives , 2000 .
[17] Frank Jackson,et al. Autonomy of Ethics , 2013, International Encyclopedia of Ethics.
[18] D. Lewis. Attitudes De Dicto and De Se , 1979 .