Real-life experience with personally familiar faces enhances discrimination based on global information

Despite the agreement that experience with faces leads to more efficient processing, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Building on empirical evidence from unfamiliar face processing in healthy populations and neuropsychological patients, the present experiment tested the hypothesis that personal familiarity is associated with superior discrimination when identity information is derived based on global, as opposed to local facial information. Diagnosticity and availability of local and global information was manipulated through varied physical similarity and spatial resolution of morph faces created from personally familiar or unfamiliar faces. We found that discrimination of subtle changes between highly similar morph faces was unaffected by familiarity. Contrariwise, relatively more pronounced physical (i.e., identity) differences were more efficiently discriminated for personally familiar faces, indicating more efficient processing of global, as opposed to local facial information through real-life experience.

[1]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Race Categorization Modulates Holistic Face Encoding , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  V Bruce,et al.  Familiarisation with Faces Selectively Enhances Sensitivity to Changes Made to the Eyes , 2001, Perception.

[4]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  The holistic representation of faces. , 2003 .

[5]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Whole not hole: Expert face recognition requires holistic perception , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  R. Kemp,et al.  Sensitivity to Feature Displacement in Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces: Beyond the Internal/External Feature Distinction , 2007, Perception.

[7]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Preservation of mouth region processing in two cases of prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[8]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 1999 .

[9]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[11]  E. McKone,et al.  The Composite Task Reveals Stronger Holistic Processing in Children than Adults for Child Faces , 2009, PloS one.

[12]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[13]  B. Rossion.  The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception , 2013 .

[14]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Feature-Based Processing of Personally Familiar Faces in Prosopagnosia: Evidence from Eye-Gaze Contingency , 2011, Behavioural neurology.

[15]  V. Blanz,et al.  Holistic processing of shape cues in face identification: Evidence from face inversion, composite faces, and acquired prosopagnosia , 2011 .

[16]  Valérie Goffaux,et al.  Spatial interactions in upright and inverted faces: Re-exploration of spatial scale influence , 2009, Vision Research.

[17]  G. Hole,et al.  Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.

[18]  V Bruce,et al.  Repetition priming of face recognition in a serial choice reaction-time task. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[19]  D. Maurer,et al.  The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing , 2007 .

[20]  William G. Hayward,et al.  Holistic Processing for Other-Race Faces in Chinese Participants Occurs for Upright but Not Inverted Faces , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[21]  C. Carbon.  Famous Faces as Icons. The Illusion of Being an Expert in the Recognition of Famous Faces , 2008, Perception.

[22]  V. Bruce.  Influences of Familiarity on the Processing of Faces , 1986, Perception.

[23]  P. Sinha,et al.  The Role of Eyebrows in Face Recognition , 2003, Perception.

[24]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Understanding face perception by means of prosopagnosia and neuroimaging. , 2014, Frontiers in bioscience.

[25]  Emanuela Bricolo,et al.  Do all kids look alike? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  C. Collin,et al.  Effects of Familiarity on Spatial Frequency Thresholds for Face Matching , 2009, Perception.

[27]  Jeremy Wilmer,et al.  Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict the Own-Race Advantage in Recognition Memory , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  Yaroslav O. Halchenko,et al.  Prioritized Detection of Personally Familiar Faces , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  V. Goffaux.  The discriminability of local cues determines the strength of holistic face processing , 2012, Vision Research.

[30]  J. Sergent.  Microgenesis of Face Perception , 1986 .

[31]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.

[32]  B. Rossion,et al.  Impairment of holistic face perception following right occipito-temporal damage in prosopagnosia: Converging evidence from gaze-contingency , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  F. Gosselin,et al.  All new kids on the block? Personally familiar face processing in a case of pure prosopagnosia following brain damage. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[34]  R. Malach,et al.  Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Face Familiarity Decisions Take 200 msec in the Human Brain: Electrophysiological Evidence from a Go/No-go Speeded Task , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  F. Keil,et al.  Categorical effects in the perception of faces , 1995, Cognition.

[37]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Personally familiar faces are perceived categorically in face‐selective regions other than the fusiform face area , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[39]  B. Rossion,et al.  Reduction of the perceptual field for inverted faces:evidence from gaze contingency with full view stimuli , 2012 .

[40]  Natural Experience Modulates the Processing of Older Adult Faces in Young Adults and 3-Year-Old Children , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  B. Rossion,et al.  The Speed of Recognition of Personally Familiar Faces , 2011, Perception.

[42]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  Information Processing during Face Recognition: The Effects of Familiarity, Inversion, and Morphing on Scanning Fixations , 2006, Perception.

[43]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Face inversion impairs holistic perception: evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[44]  A. Young,et al.  Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features , 1985, Perception.

[45]  C. Wallraven,et al.  Processing of facial identity and expression: a psychophysical, physiological, and computational perspective. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[46]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Reduced fixation on the upper area of personally familiar faces following acquired prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[47]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  B. Rossion,et al.  Fixation Patterns During Recognition of Personally Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[49]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. , 1975 .

[50]  V. Bruce,et al.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[51]  Meike Ramon.  Differential Processing of Vertical Interfeature Relations Due to Real-Life Experience with Personally Familiar Faces , 2015, Perception.

[52]  N. J. Cohen,et al.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[55]  Meike Ramon,et al.  Perception of global facial geometry is modulated through experience , 2015, PeerJ.

[56]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  When intuition fails to align with data: A reply to Rossion (2013) , 2013, Visual cognition.

[57]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: An fMRI adaptation study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[58]  B. Rossion,et al.  Impaired holistic processing of unfamiliar individual faces in acquired prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The dynamics of cognition and action: mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition. , 1988, Psychological review.

[60]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[61]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[63]  Erin M. Harley,et al.  Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away? , 2005, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[64]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect , 2010, Cortex.

[65]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Recognizing Degraded Faces: The Contribution of Configural and Featural Cues , 2012, Perception.

[66]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Prolonged Visual Experience in Adulthood Modulates Holistic Face Perception , 2008, PloS one.

[67]  Ruosi Wang,et al.  Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict Face Recognition Ability , 2012, Psychological science.

[68]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[69]  I. Biederman,et al.  Is Pigmentation Important for Face Recognition? Evidence from Contrast Negation , 2006, Perception.

[70]  F. Galton.  Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development , 1883 .

[71]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Acquired prosopagnosia as a face-specific disorder: Ruling out the general visual similarity account , 2010, Neuropsychologia.