Human brain imaging during controlled and natural viewing

Assorted technologies such as; EEG, MEG, fMRI, BEM, MRI, TMS and BCI are being integrated to understand how human visual cortical areas interact during controlled laboratory and natural viewing conditions. Our focus is on the problem of separating signals from the spatially close early visual areas. The solution involves taking advantage of known functional anatomy to guide stimulus selection and employing principles of spatial and temporal response properties that simplify analysis. The method also unifies MEG and EEG recordings and provides a means for improving existing boundary element head models. In going beyond carefully controlled stimuli, in natural viewing with scanning eye movements, assessing brain states with BCI is a most challenging task. Frequent eye movements contribute artifacts to the recordings. A linear regression method is introduced that is shown to effectively characterize these frequent artifacts and could be used to remove them. In free viewing, saccadic landings initiate visual processing epochs and could be used to trigger strictly time based analysis methods. However, temporal instabilities indicate frequency based analysis would be an important adjunct. The class of Cauchy filter functions is introduced that have narrow time and frequency properties well matched to the EEG/MEG spectrum for avoiding channel leakage.

[1]  E. Halgren,et al.  Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically‐mapped stimulus locations , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[2]  L. Chalupa,et al.  Organization of Visual Areas in Macaque and Human Cerebral Cortex , 2002 .

[3]  Christian Bellebaum,et al.  Post-saccadic updating of visual space in the posterior parietal cortex in humans , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  T. Vilis,et al.  Gaze-Centered Updating of Visual Space in Human Parietal Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Claudio M. Privitera,et al.  Decision-Level Fusion of EEG and Pupil Features for Single-Trial Visual Detection Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  E. Fetz,et al.  The neurochip BCI: towards a neural prosthesis for upper limb function , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  John E Richards,et al.  Cortical sources of event-related potentials in the prosaccade and antisaccade task. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  The folding fingerprint of visual cortex reveals the timing of human V1 and V2 , 2007 .

[9]  S. Everling,et al.  Cortical potentials preceding pro- and antisaccades in man. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  Advances in multifocal methods for imaging human brain activity , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  J. Henderson Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  L Stark,et al.  Closely spaced saccades. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[14]  C. Genovese,et al.  Spatial Updating in Human Parietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[15]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Microsaccades differentially modulate neural activity in the striate and extrastriate visual cortex , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  W Kropfl,et al.  The phasic relation of a component of alpha rhythm to fixation saccadic eye movements. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  D. Hubel,et al.  The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  Hooge PII: S0042-6989(98)00213-2 , 1998 .

[19]  I. Nelken,et al.  Transient Induced Gamma-Band Response in EEG as a Manifestation of Miniature Saccades , 2008, Neuron.

[20]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Human Microsaccade-Related Visual Brain Responses , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Xian Zhang,et al.  A principal component analysis of multifocal pattern reversal VEP. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[22]  S Vanni,et al.  Cortical Generators of Human Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials and Fields , 2009, NeuroImage.

[23]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces, Virtual Reality, and Videogames , 2008, Computer.

[24]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Symmetric BEM Formulation for the M/EEG Forward Problem , 2003, IPMI.

[25]  T. Paus Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI) – towards a new communication channel for online control in gaming applications , 2007, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[27]  J. Culham,et al.  The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: What have we learned from neuroimaging? , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  Thom Carney,et al.  Localizing Sites of Activation in Primary Visual Cortex Using Visual-Evoked Potentials and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[30]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  Combining MRI and VEP imaging to isolate the temporal response of visual cortical areas , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[31]  Akihiro Yagi,et al.  Contrast dependence of lambda response , 2005 .