An efficient and practical approach to obtain a better optimum solution for structural optimization

For many structural optimization problems, it is hard or even impossible to find the global optimum solution owing to unaffordable computational cost. An alternative and practical way of thinking is thus proposed in this research to obtain an optimum design which may not be global but is better than most local optimum solutions that can be found by gradient-based search methods. The way to reach this goal is to find a smaller search space for gradient-based search methods. It is found in this research that data mining can accomplish this goal easily. The activities of classification, association and clustering in data mining are employed to reduce the original design space. For unconstrained optimization problems, the data mining activities are used to find a smaller search region which contains the global or better local solutions. For constrained optimization problems, it is used to find the feasible region or the feasible region with better objective values. Numerical examples show that the optimum solutions found in the reduced design space by sequential quadratic programming (SQP) are indeed much better than those found by SQP in the original design space. The optimum solutions found in a reduced space by SQP sometimes are even better than the solution found using a hybrid global search method with approximate structural analyses.

[1]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Introduction to optimal design , 1989 .

[2]  Karl Rihaczek,et al.  1. WHAT IS DATA MINING? , 2019, Data Mining for the Social Sciences.

[3]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Self-adaptive penalties for GA-based optimization , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[4]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[5]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[6]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[7]  Ingo Rechenberg,et al.  Evolutionsstrategie : Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution , 1973 .

[8]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[9]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[10]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[11]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Mastering Data Mining , 2001, Technometrics.

[12]  Jürgen Branke,et al.  Faster convergence by means of fitness estimation , 2005, Soft Comput..

[13]  Chun-Yin Wu,et al.  Truss structure optimization using adaptive multi-population differential evolution , 2010 .

[14]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[15]  Yuan Wang,et al.  Some Applications of Number-Theoretic Methods in Statistics , 1994 .

[16]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[17]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[18]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Neural networks for optimization and signal processing , 1993 .

[19]  W. Vent,et al.  Rechenberg, Ingo, Evolutionsstrategie — Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution. 170 S. mit 36 Abb. Frommann‐Holzboog‐Verlag. Stuttgart 1973. Broschiert , 1975 .