Chaotic advection and reaction during engineered injection and extraction in heterogeneous porous media

During in situ remediation of contaminated groundwater, a treatment solution is often injected into the contaminated region to initiate reactions that degrade the contaminant. Degradation reactions only occur where the treatment solution and the contaminated groundwater are close enough that mixing will bring them together. Degradation is enhanced when the treatment solution is spread into the contaminated region, thereby increasing the spatial extent of mixing and degradation reactions. Spreading results from local velocity variations that emerge from aquifer heterogeneity and from spatial variations in the external forcings that drive flow. Certain patterns in external forcings have been shown to create chaotic advection, which is known to enhance spreading of solutes in groundwater flow and other laminar flows. This work uses numerical simulations of flow and reactive transport to investigate how aquifer heterogeneity changes the qualitative and quantitative aspects of chaotic advection in an aquifer, and the extent to which these changes enhance contaminant degradation. We generate chaotic advection using engineered injection and extraction (EIE), an approach that uses sequential injection and extraction of water in wells surrounding the contaminated region to create time-dependent flow fields that promote plume spreading. We demonstrate that as the degree of heterogeneity increases, both plume spreading and contaminant degradation increase; however, the increase in contaminant degradation is small relative to the increase in plume spreading. Our results show that the combined effects of EIE and heterogeneity produce substantially more stretching than either effect separately.

[1]  M. Stremler,et al.  Chaotic advection in pulsed source-sink systems , 2007 .

[2]  Julio M. Ottino,et al.  From Reynolds’s stretching and folding to mixing studies using horseshoe maps , 1994 .

[3]  James D. Meiss,et al.  Differential dynamical systems , 2007, Mathematical modeling and computation.

[4]  James D. Meiss,et al.  Transport in Transitory Dynamical Systems , 2010, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[5]  Marco Dentz,et al.  Concentration statistics for mixing-controlled reactive transport in random heterogeneous media. , 2008, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[6]  Hassan Aref,et al.  Topological fluid mechanics of point vortex motions , 1999 .

[7]  J. Ottino The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos, and Transport , 1989 .

[8]  Hassan Aref,et al.  Chaotic advection in pulsed source–sink systems , 1988 .

[9]  Amvrossios C. Bagtzoglou,et al.  Chaotic Advection and Enhanced Groundwater Remediation , 2007 .

[10]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Effective reaction parameters for mixing controlled reactions in heterogeneous media , 2008 .

[11]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[12]  J. Ottino Mixing, chaotic advection, and turbulence , 1990 .

[13]  David W. Pollock,et al.  User's guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3; a particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model , 1994 .

[14]  Julio M. Ottino,et al.  Feasibility of numerical tracking of material lines and surfaces in chaotic flows , 1987 .

[15]  Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy,et al.  Non-Fickian mixing: Temporal evolution of the scalar dissipation rate in heterogeneous porous media , 2010 .

[16]  Hassan Aref,et al.  Designing for chaos: applications of chaotic advection at the microscale , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Jessica Schulze,et al.  Chaos And Integrability In Nonlinear Dynamics , 2016 .

[18]  G. Dagan Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  D. C. Mays,et al.  Engineered injection and extraction to enhance reaction for improved in situ remediation , 2013 .

[20]  Andreas Englert,et al.  Mixing, spreading and reaction in heterogeneous media: a brief review. , 2011, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[21]  P. Cvitanović,et al.  Dynamical averaging in terms of periodic orbits , 1995 .

[22]  D. C. Mays,et al.  Plume spreading in groundwater by stretching and folding , 2012 .

[23]  C. Grebogi,et al.  Chaotic advection, diffusion, and reactions in open flows. , 2000, Chaos.

[24]  G. Dagan Flow and transport in porous formations , 1989 .

[25]  S. Wiggins Coherent structures and chaotic advection in three dimensions , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  Jean-Luc Thiffeault Stretching and curvature of material lines in chaotic flows , 2004 .

[27]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  A procedure for the solution of multicomponent reactive transport problems , 2005 .

[28]  Reply to comment by D. R. Lester et al. on “Plume spreading in groundwater by stretching and folding” , 2013 .

[29]  Garrison Sposito,et al.  Chaotic solute advection by unsteady groundwater flow , 2006 .

[30]  John L. Wilson,et al.  Efficient and accurate front tracking for two‐dimensional groundwater flow models , 1991 .

[31]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process , 2000 .

[32]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[33]  C.A.J. Appelo,et al.  FLOW AND TRANSPORT , 2004 .

[34]  W. Nowak,et al.  Stochastic flux‐related analysis of transverse mixing in two‐dimensional heterogeneous porous media , 2011 .

[35]  Guy Metcalfe,et al.  Toward enhanced subsurface intervention methods using chaotic advection. , 2012, Journal of contaminant hydrology.