Virtual Commercial Vehicle Control Stations for California: A Review of Legal and Institutional Issues

In the past five years, commercial vehicle travel has increased 60 percent on California's highways, without a corresponding increase in compliance inspection station capacity or enforcement officers. Commercial vehicles that do not comply with regulations impose significant public costs including, for example, pavement and structure damage to roads and catastrophic crashes. In response to these problems, the California Department of Transportation is investigating the potential application of detection and communication technology in virtual compliance stations (VCS) to cost-effectively improve enforcement of commercial vehicle regulations. This study begins with a description of the fledgling VCS research programs in the U.S. as well more advanced international VCS programs. Next, the results of expert interview with key officials involved in the early deployment stages of VCS programs in Kentucky, Florida, Indiana, and Saskatchewan are reported. This is followed by an analysis of institutional barriers to VCS screening and automated enforcement based on the relatively extensive body of literature on the commercial vehicle electronic pre-screening programs and red-light and speeding automated enforcement programs. The paper concludes with some key recommendations to address legal and institutional barriers to VCS deployment in the U.S.

[1]  Joseph M. Sussman What Have We Learned about Intelligent Transportation Systems? Chapter 1, What Have We Learned about ITS? A Synthesis , 2000 .

[2]  Patricia F Waller SOCIAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ITS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT , 1995 .

[3]  A Gains,et al.  The national safety camera programme - four-year evaluation report - December 2005 , 2004 .

[4]  B. Howard,et al.  The telephone interview. , 1988, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[5]  Bg Heydecker,et al.  A cost recovery system for speed and red-light cameras: two-year pilot evaluation. Research Paper, 11 February 2003, Department for Transport , 2003 .

[6]  Jack Lucero Fleck,et al.  Can We Make Red-Light Runners Stop?: Red-Light Photo Enforcement in San Francisco, California , 1999 .

[7]  Allan J. DeBlasio What Have We Learned About Intelligent Transportation Systems? Chapter 8, What Have We Learned About Cross-Cutting Institutional Issues? , 2000 .

[8]  D Stanczyk,et al.  OVERLOAD VEHICLES SCREENING FOR ENFORCEMENT , 2002 .

[9]  C W Lynn,et al.  LEGAL ISSUES CONCERNING THE USE OF PHOTO-RADAR , 1992 .

[10]  S M Christie,et al.  Are mobile speed cameras effective? A controlled before and after study , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[11]  R Gellman PRIVACY AND ELECTRONIC CLEARANCE SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[12]  A J DeBlasio WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED ABOUT CROSS-CUTTING INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES? IN: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED ABOUT INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS? CHAPTER 8 , 2000 .

[13]  S Sharma,et al.  INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS FIELD OPERATIONAL TEST CROSS-CUTTING STUDY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATIONS - ROADSIDE , 1998 .

[14]  Chris A. Bell Oregon Green Light CVO evaluation : final report : executive summary , 2001 .

[15]  D J Holdener ELECTRONIC TOLL COLLECTION INFORMATION: IS PERSONAL PRIVACY PROTECTED? , 1997 .

[16]  C W Lynn,et al.  AUTOMATED SPEED ENFORCEMENT PILOT PROJECT FOR THE CAPITAL BELTWAY: FEASIBILITY OF PHOTO-RADAR. FINAL REPORT , 1992 .

[17]  M. Baucus Transportation Research Board , 1982 .

[18]  Mark R McCord INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS TO THE DEPLOYMENT OF CVO/IVHS INNOVATIONS IN OHIO. FINAL REPORT , 1994 .

[19]  Bg Heydecker,et al.  The national safety camera programme: three-year evaluation report , 2004 .