Frequency-dependent simulation of volume conduction in a linear model of the implanted cochlea

Volume conduction models of the implanted cochlea are useful tools for investigating cochlear implant function. To date, however, all existing models have assumed that the tissues of the cochlea are purely resistive, despite evidence to the contrary. In this paper, a preliminary attempt to incorporate frequency-dependent effects is made using a simple, extruded finite element model of the cochlea. It was found that resistive and dispersive formulations exhibited marked differences in the pattern of current flow, especially later in the phase. The scala tympani response remained largely resistive as per published experimental evidence. However, injected current was also diverted away from higher impedance bone and neural tissue towards lower impedance pathways, particularly the cerebrospinal fluid in the modiolus. Further investigation of these effects is warranted to better understand these differences and how they might affect existing models of neural excitation.

[1]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics , 2000 .

[2]  Warren M Grill,et al.  Analysis of the quasi-static approximation for calculating potentials generated by neural stimulation , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  P. Carter,et al.  Incorporating vascular structure into electric volume conduction models of the cochlea , 2012, 2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences.

[5]  T Hanekom,et al.  Three-Dimensional Spiraling Finite Element Model of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlea , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[6]  Subrata Saha,et al.  The electrical and dielectric properties of human bone tissue and their relationship with density and bone mineral content , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  G. Girzon,et al.  Investigation of current flow in the inner ear during electrical stimulation of intracochlear electrodes , 1987 .

[8]  R. Schoonhoven,et al.  Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.

[9]  Darren M. Whiten Electro-anatomical models of the cochlear implant , 2007 .

[10]  R. K. Kalkman,et al.  Stimulation of the Facial Nerve by Intracochlear Electrodes in Otosclerosis: A Computer Modeling Study , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  J. Patrick Reilly,et al.  Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electropathology , 1998 .

[12]  D Strelioff A computer simulation of the generation and distribution of cochlear potentials. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  E. Neufeld,et al.  IT’IS Database for Thermal and Electromagnetic Parameters of Biological Tissues , 2012 .

[15]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[16]  B M Clopton,et al.  Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis. , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[17]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.