Transfer of Cognitive Training across Magnitude Dimensions Achieved with Concurrent Brain Stimulation of the Parietal Lobe

Improvement in performance following cognitive training is known to be further enhanced when coupled with brain stimulation. Here we ask whether training-induced changes can be maintained long term and, crucially, whether they can extend to other related but untrained skills. We trained overall 40 human participants on a simple and well established paradigm assessing the ability to discriminate numerosity–or the number of items in a set–which is thought to rely on an “approximate number sense” (ANS) associated with parietal lobes. We coupled training with parietal stimulation in the form of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a noninvasive technique that modulates neural activity. This yielded significantly better and longer lasting improvement (up to 16 weeks post-training) of the precision of the ANS compared with cognitive training in absence of stimulation, stimulation in absence of cognitive training, and cognitive training coupled to stimulation to a control site (motor areas). Critically, only ANS improvement induced by parietal tRNS + Training transferred to proficiency in other parietal lobe-based quantity judgment, i.e., time and space discrimination, but not to quantity-unrelated tasks measuring attention, executive functions, and visual pattern recognition. These results indicate that coupling intensive cognitive training with tRNS to critical brain regions resulted not only in the greatest and longer lasting improvement of numerosity discrimination, but importantly in this enhancement being transferable when trained and untrained abilities are carefully chosen to share common cognitive and neuronal components.

[1]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[2]  D. Tanné,et al.  Perceptual learning: learning to see , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  J. Aggleton,et al.  Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: the effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  T. Bussey,et al.  Distinct patterns of behavioural impairments resulting from fornix transection or neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices in the rat , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional Networks , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  George W Rebok,et al.  Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[8]  D. Mumby,et al.  Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts. , 2002, Learning & memory.

[9]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  C. S. Green,et al.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention , 2003, Nature.

[12]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[13]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Origins and endpoints of the core systems of number. Reply to Fias and Verguts , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Bogdan Draganski,et al.  Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training , 2004, Nature.

[15]  A. Nieder Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  Hilary Barth,et al.  Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Sygal Amitay,et al.  Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  How specifically do we learn? Imaging the learning of multiplication and subtraction , 2006, NeuroImage.

[19]  E. J. Carter,et al.  Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children , 2006, PLoS biology.

[20]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Towards unravelling task‐related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex , 2007 .

[21]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High-Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis , 2008, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[23]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[24]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Increasing fluid intelligence is possible after all , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[26]  Felix M Mottaghy,et al.  Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)-From insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction. , 2008, Methods.

[27]  D. Simons,et al.  The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[28]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  Dissociations and interactions between time, numerosity and space processing , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Beyond the number domain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  J. Devlin,et al.  Triple Dissociation of Faces, Bodies, and Objects in Extrastriate Cortex , 2009, Current Biology.

[31]  E. Spelke,et al.  Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Pablo Celnik,et al.  Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Géza Gergely Ambrus,et al.  Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: Comparison of tDCS and tRNS , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  T. Klingberg Training and plasticity of working memory , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Jessica A. Grahn,et al.  Putting brain training to the test , 2010, Nature.

[37]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  D. Simons,et al.  Do Action Video Games Improve Perception and Cognition? , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[39]  A. Antal,et al.  Evaluating Aftereffects of Short-Duration Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation on Cortical Excitability , 2011, Neural plasticity.

[40]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[41]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  Numbers and time doubly dissociate , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  Improving working memory: Exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Random Noise Stimulation Improves Neuroplasticity in Perceptual Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Jessica F Cantlon,et al.  Math, monkeys, and the developing brain , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  H. Slagter Conventional working memory training may not improve intelligence , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Matthias Mölle,et al.  Sleep enhances memory consolidation in the hippocampus-dependent object-place recognition task in rats , 2012, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[48]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[49]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Kathy A. Low,et al.  Performance gains from directed training do not transfer to untrained tasks. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[51]  N. Shea,et al.  The neuroethics of non-invasive brain stimulation , 2012, Current Biology.

[52]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Malleability of the approximate number system: effects of feedback and training , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[53]  Monica Melby-Lervåg,et al.  Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[54]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Long-Term Enhancement of Brain Function and Cognition Using Cognitive Training and Brain Stimulation , 2013, Current Biology.

[55]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  J. Born,et al.  Sleep-dependency of episodic-like memory consolidation in rats , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[57]  N. Taatgen The nature and transfer of cognitive skills. , 2013, Psychological review.