Student misconceptions in writing balanced equations for dissolving ionic compounds in water

The goal of this study was to identify student misconceptions and difficulties in writing symbolic-level balanced equations for dissolving ionic compounds in water. A sample of 105 college students were asked to provide balanced equations for dissolving four ionic compounds in water. Another 37 college students participated in semi-structured interviews where they provided balanced equations for dissolving the same four ionic compounds in water and were asked to explore their thought processes at the particulate level associated with writing these equations. Misconceptions identified from these data included (i) the notion that water reacts with the ionic salts through double displacement to form a metal oxide and an acid; (ii) the notion that ionic salts dissolve as neutral atoms or molecules in water; (iii) confusion regarding the proper use of subscripts and coefficients; and (iv) the notion that polyatomic ions will dissociate into smaller particles in water. This study also describes the possible sources of these misconceptions.

[1]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[2]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  Conceptual versus algorithmic learning in high school chemistry: the case of basic quantum chemical concepts. Part 2. Students’ common errors, misconceptions and difficulties in understanding , 2008 .

[3]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet” , 2011 .

[4]  From Inert Object to Chemical Substance: Students' Initial Conceptions and Conceptual Development during an Introductory Experimental Chemistry Sequence. , 2000 .

[5]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electrochemical (galvanic) and electrolytic cells , 1992 .

[6]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  Exploring How Different Features of Animations of Sodium Chloride Dissolution Affect Students’ Explanations , 2007 .

[7]  Jazlin Ebenezer,et al.  Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry , 1995 .

[8]  Susan C. Nurrenbern,et al.  Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: Is There a Difference?. , 1987 .

[9]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference , 1993 .

[10]  Barbara A. Sawrey.  Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited , 1990 .

[11]  Dawn Rickey,et al.  Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions , 2007 .

[12]  R. Stavy.  Children's conception of changes in the state of matter: From liquid (or solid) to gas , 1990 .

[13]  Hong Kwen Boo,et al.  Students' Understandings of Chemical Bonds and the Energetics of Chemical Reactions. , 1998 .

[14]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  The role of multiple representations in the understanding of ideal gas problems , 2011 .

[15]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[16]  Roger Osborne,et al.  Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water , 1983 .

[17]  Big bubbles in boiling liquids: students' views , 2008 .

[18]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  University students' conceptions of bonding in melting and dissolving phenomena , 2011 .

[19]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells , 1997 .

[20]  Deborah P. Rosenthal,et al.  Student misinterpretations and misconceptions based on their explanations of two computer animations of varying complexity depicting the same oxidation–reduction reaction , 2012 .

[21]  Kimberly Jo Smith,et al.  Evaluating Student Understanding of Solution Chemistry through Microscopic Representations , 1996 .

[22]  Ali Al-Kunifed,et al.  Investigation of High School Chemistry Students' Concepts of Chemical Symbol, Formula, and Equation: Students' Prescientific Conceptions. , 1993 .

[23]  D. Treagust,et al.  Multiple Representations in Chemical Education , 2009 .

[24]  D. Ardaç,et al.  Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change , 2004 .

[25]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Learners' mental models of metallic bonding: A cross‐age study , 2003 .

[26]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding , 1993 .

[27]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Using a Computer Animation To Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding of a Can-Crushing Demonstration. , 2000 .

[28]  C. Furió,et al.  Functional fixedness and functional reduction as common sense reasonings in chemical equilibrium and in geometry and polarity of molecules , 2000 .

[29]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  Is an atom of copper malleable , 1986 .

[30]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Students’ understanding of boiling points and intermolecular forces , 2009 .

[31]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Mediating Mental Models of Metals: Acknowledging the Priority of the Learner's Prior Learning. , 2003 .

[32]  Hans-Jürgen Schmidt,et al.  Textbooks’ and teachers’ understanding of acid-base models used in chemistry teaching , 2005 .

[33]  Hans-Dieter Barke,et al.  Misconceptions in Chemistry: Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education , 2009 .

[34]  George M. Bodner,et al.  The Many Forms of Constructivism , 2001 .

[35]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  You Can’t Get There from Here1 , 2010 .

[36]  Alain Dumon,et al.  Atom and molecule: upper secondary school French students’ representations in long-term memory , 2005 .

[37]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[38]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  The development of an open-ended drawing tool: an alternative diagnostic tool for assessing students' understanding of the particulate nature of matter , 2011 .

[39]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  Investigating Students' Ability to Transfer Ideas Learned from Molecular Animations of the Dissolution Process. , 2008 .

[40]  C. Klaassen,et al.  Interpreting students' and teachers' discourse in science classes: An underestimated problem? , 1996 .

[41]  Roberto Ma. Gregorius,et al.  Can Animations Effectively Substitute for Traditional Teaching Methods? Part I: Preparation and Testing of Materials , 2010 .

[42]  B. Andersson,et al.  Pupils' Explanations of Some Aspects of Chemical Reactions. , 1986 .

[43]  W. L. Yarroch.  Student Understanding of Chemical Equation Balancing. , 1985 .

[44]  Michael J. Sanger.  Evaluating Students' Conceptual Understanding of Balanced Equations and Stoichiometric Ratios Using a Particulate Drawing , 2005 .

[45]  Roberto Ma. Gregorius,et al.  Can animations effectively substitute for traditional teaching methods? Part II: Potential for differentiated learning , 2010 .

[46]  Jazlin Ebenezer,et al.  Chemistry students' conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography , 1996 .

[47]  Bill Butts,et al.  HSC chemistry students' understanding of the structure and properties of molecular and ionic compounds , 1987 .

[48]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  "Concept Learning versus Problem Solving": Does Particle Motion Have an Effect?. , 2007 .

[49]  Miles Pickering.  Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving , 1990 .

[50]  Jazlin Ebenezer,et al.  A Hypermedia Environment to Explore and Negotiate Students' Conceptions: Animation of the Solution Process of Table Salt , 2001 .

[51]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Progression in children's understanding of the matter concept from elementary to high school , 2006 .

[52]  G. Bodner.  Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .

[53]  David P. Cartrette,et al.  Students' understanding of acids/bases in organic chemistry contexts , 2011 .

[54]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[55]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Mental Models : The Role of Representations in Problem Solving in Chemistry PROCEEDINGS , 2002 .

[56]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electric circuits and oxidation‐reduction equations , 1992 .

[57]  Keith S. Taber.  Student Understanding of Ionic Bonding: Molecular versus Electrostatic Framework?. , 1997 .