Surmounting Interunit Barriers Factors Associated with Interunit Communication Intensity in the Multinational Corporation

If multinational corporations (MNCs) can gain competitive advantage from interunit knowledge sharing, how to promote interunit communication in MNCs is a key question. We develop a model of factors that may influence communication in intra-MNC interunit relationships and test it on a sample of 308 dyadic relationships between Finnish and Chinese subsidiaries and their headquarters and sister units. Our results indicate that the intensity (frequency and perceived importance) of interunit communication is related to the extent of subsidiary managers' participation in corporate training programs, their fluency in the language in which the interunit communication takes place, and, to some extent, to the use of expatriate managers.

[1]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1988 .

[2]  John Dimmick,et al.  The Gratification Niches of Personal E-mail and the Telephone , 2000, Commun. Res..

[3]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  In Search of Centre of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations , 2000 .

[4]  G. Hedlund.  The hypermodern MNC—A heterarchy? , 1986 .

[5]  Denice Welch,et al.  The Persistent Impact of Language on Global Operations , 2001 .

[6]  Y. Doz,et al.  The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision , 1999 .

[7]  P. Earley,et al.  Culture, self-identity, and work , 1993 .

[8]  J. Daniels.  Organizing the Multinational Enterprise: An Information-Processing Perspective , 1988 .

[9]  B. Willerman,et al.  Living Abroad: Personal Adjustment and Personnel Policy in the Overseas Setting. , 1983 .

[10]  Vincent di Norcia.  Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1991 .

[11]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[12]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[13]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. , 1993 .

[14]  Denice Welch,et al.  In the shadow: the impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational , 1999 .

[15]  David M. Schweiger,et al.  Global Strategy Implementation at the Business Unit Level: Operational Capabilities and Administrative Mechanisms , 1991 .

[16]  Jean-Louis Barsoux,et al.  The global challenge : frameworks for international human resource management , 2006 .

[17]  John Urry,et al.  Social networks, travel and talk. , 2003, The British journal of sociology.

[18]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[19]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[20]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations. , 1977 .

[21]  S. Hymer,et al.  The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment , 1976 .

[22]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[23]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[24]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations , 1994 .

[25]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[26]  David M. Brock,et al.  "Your forward is our reverse, your right, our wrong": rethinking multinational planning processes in light of national culture , 2000 .

[27]  J. Johanson,et al.  Development of MNC Centres of Excellence , 2000 .

[28]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[29]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .