Les E. Atlas Department of Electrical Engineering nucleus. In particular, some strong correlation between University of Washington single-unit electrical activity and the actual shape and structure of the nerve cells has been found [7-81. THE PERCEPTION OF SOUND is actually a multifaceted The dorsal cochlear nucleus is not as well understood and I task; frequency discrimination, loudness judgment, sound probably more complicated than the ventral cochlear nucleus. localization, and speech perception place different demands Anatomical and response-type classifications indicate that, on the auditory system. Since the human auditory system can while the input channels to the dorsal and ventral cochlear have the ability to perform all of these tasks, a very diverse nuclei are the same, the shape and structure of the cells in the set of neural structures is likely. This paper will avoid the two regions are quite different [9]. Also, the dorsal region almost impossible complexity of unifying all functions of provides a greater number of inhibitory single-unit responses sound perception by independently describing some higher than does the ventral region [10]. level coding aspects of frequency discrimination, amplitude As the auditory pathway is ascended, neural crossings to representation, and speech representation. The bulk of the the contralateral side become dominant. Some of the second information that will follow is based on a grouping of other order neurons within the cochlear nucleus give off axons researchers' published results. which cross over via the trapezoid body and terminate at This paper has two goals; the first is to consider the synapses in the superior olivary complex. Other dorsal cells feasibility of electrical implants for the profoundly deaf, at run directly to the contralateral superior olivary complex, and levels higher than the cochlea or auditory nerve, for forms of a few ventral cochlear nucleus cells remain on the ipsilateral deafness where the auditory nerve is non-functional or nonside. It seems possible that this partitioning of contralateral existent. An understanding of anatomical and functional and ipsilateral axons from the ventral cochlear nucleus is attributes of higher auditory centers is needed to address this related to binaural tasks. However, as will be discussed problem. The second goal is to consider these higher centers below, this is not the only place where significant cross-over as very advanced and efficient speech processing structures. occurs. If the code and architecture of these neural structures were understood, improvements to speech recognition and processing algorithms could be developed by mimicking certain aspects of human auditory processing.
[1]
A. T. Rasmussen.
Studies of the viiith cranial nerve of man
,
1940
.
[2]
I. Sando.
The Anatomical Interrelationships of the Cochlear Nerve Fibers
,
1965
.
[3]
L. Wolin,et al.
Frequency discrimination thresholds following auditory cortex ablations in the monkey.
,
1971
.
[4]
N. Kiang,et al.
Single unit activity in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat
,
1975,
The Journal of comparative neurology.
[5]
J. Goldberg,et al.
Discharge characteristics of neurons in anteroventral and dorsal cochlear nuclei of cat.
,
1973,
Brain research.
[6]
K. Chow,et al.
Numerical estimates of the auditory central nervous system of the rhesus monkey
,
1951
.
[7]
Aage R. Møller.
Coding of Amplitude‐ and Frequency‐Modulated Tones and Noise in the Cochlear Nucleus
,
1973
.
[8]
Walker Ae,et al.
The Projection of the Medial Geniculate Body to the Cerebral Cortex in the Macaque Monkey.
,
1937
.
[9]
Dennis H. Klatt,et al.
Prediction of perceived phonetic distance from critical-band spectra: A first step
,
1982,
ICASSP.
[10]
D. Caspary,et al.
Classification of subpopulations of neurons in the cochlear nuclei of the kangaroo rat.
,
1972,
Experimental neurology.
[11]
A. Møller.
Unit responses in the cochlear nucleus of the rat to sweep tones.
,
1969,
Acta physiologica Scandinavica.
[12]
J. Goldberg,et al.
RESPONSE OF NEURONS OF THE SUPERIOR OLIVARY COMPLEX OF THE CAT TO ACOUSTIC STIMULI OF LONG DURATION.
,
1964,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[13]
Les Atlas,et al.
Cross-channel correlation for the enhancement of noisy speech
,
1985,
ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[14]
D. D. Greenwood,et al.
Response of neurons in the cochlear nuclei to variations in noise bandwidth and to tone-noise combinations.
,
1970,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15]
J. E. Rose,et al.
Microelectrode studies on medial geniculate body of cat. II. Response to clicks.
,
1952,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[16]
K K Osen,et al.
Cytoarchitecture of the cochlear nuclei in the cat
,
1969
.
[17]
J. E. Hind,et al.
Some discharge characteristics of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Timing of the discharges and observations on binaural stimulation.
,
1963,
Journal of neurophysiology.