Inspiration, simulation and design for smart robot manipulators from the sucker actuation mechanism of cephalopods

Octopus arms house 200-300 independently controlled suckers that can alternately afford an octopus fine manipulation of small objects and produce high adhesion forces on virtually any non-porous surface. Octopuses use their suckers to grasp, rotate and reposition soft objects (e.g., octopus eggs) without damaging them and to provide strong, reversible adhesion forces to anchor the octopus to hard substrates (e.g., rock) during wave surge. The biological 'design' of the sucker system is understood to be divided anatomically into three functional groups: the infundibulum that produces a surface seal that conforms to arbitrary surface geometry; the acetabulum that generates negative pressures for adhesion; and the extrinsic muscles that allow adhered surfaces to be rotated relative to the arm. The effector underlying these abilities is the muscular hydrostat. Guided by sensory input, the thousands of muscle fibers within the muscular hydrostats of the sucker act in coordination to provide stiffness or force when and where needed. The mechanical malleability of octopus suckers, the interdigitated arrangement of their muscle fibers and the flexible interconnections of its parts make direct studies of their control challenging. We developed a dynamic simulator (ABSAMS) that models the general functioning of muscular hydrostat systems built from assemblies of biologically constrained muscular hydrostat models. We report here on simulation studies of octopus-inspired and artificial suckers implemented in this system. These simulations reproduce aspects of octopus sucker performance and squid tentacle extension. Simulations run with these models using parameters from man-made actuators and materials can serve as tools for designing soft robotic implementations of man-made artificial suckers and soft manipulators.

[1]  B. Hochner,et al.  Control of Octopus Arm Extension by a Peripheral Motor Program , 2001, Science.

[2]  W. Kier,et al.  The arrangement and function of molluscan muscle , 1988 .

[3]  Joseph O'Rourke,et al.  Computational Geometry in C. , 1995 .

[4]  J. Bruce C. Davies,et al.  Continuum robots - a state of the art , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[5]  Y Gutfreund,et al.  Organization of Octopus Arm Movements: A Model System for Studying the Control of Flexible Arms , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  W. Kier,et al.  Fast muscle in squid (Loligo pealei): contractile properties of a specialized muscle fibre type. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  J. Mather ‘Home’ choice and modification by juvenile Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): specialized intelligence and tool use? , 1994 .

[8]  B. Hochner,et al.  Patterns of Arm Muscle Activation Involved in Octopus Reaching Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Smith Cephalopod sucker design and the physical limits to negative pressure , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  J. Voight The arrangement of suckers on octopodid arms as a continuous character , 1993 .

[11]  A. Evans,et al.  A finite element simulation scheme for biological muscular hydrostats. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  T. Preuss,et al.  All-or-none contraction and sodium channels in a subset of circular muscle fibers of squid mantle. , 1996, The Biological bulletin.

[13]  B. Hochner,et al.  Octopuses Use a Human-like Strategy to Control Precise Point-to-Point Arm Movements , 2006, Current Biology.

[14]  W. Kier,et al.  The Morphology and Mechanics of Octopus Suckers. , 1990, The Biological bulletin.

[15]  G. Fiorito,et al.  Problem solving ability of Octopus vulgaris Lamarck (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). , 1990, Behavioral and neural biology.

[16]  Andrew M. Smith NEGATIVE PRESSURE GENERATED BY OCTOPUS SUCKERS: A STUDY OF THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF WATER IN NATURE , 1991 .

[17]  W. Kier,et al.  Functional design of tentacles in squid : Linking sarcomere ultrastructure to gross morphological dynamics , 1997 .

[18]  M. Laszlo Computational Geometry and Computer Graphics in C , 1995 .

[19]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Patterns of Motor Activity in the Isolated Nerve Cord of the Octopus Arm , 2006, The Biological Bulletin.

[20]  J. Rothwell Principles of Neural Science , 1982 .

[21]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  A hydrostatic robot for marine applications , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[22]  M. Chi,et al.  Problem-Solving Ability. , 1985 .

[23]  Gino van den Bergen Collision Detection in Interactive 3D Environments , 2003 .

[24]  R. C. Weast Handbook of chemistry and physics , 1973 .

[25]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Dynamic model of the octopus arm. I. Biomechanics of the octopus reaching movement. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Kinematics and the Implementation of an Elephant's Trunk Manipulator and Other Continuum Style Robots , 2003, J. Field Robotics.

[27]  J. W. King,et al.  Handbook of clinical laboratory data , 1965 .

[28]  Brent L. Grazman,et al.  Handbook of chemistry and physics: A ready-reference book of chemical and physical data: 71st edition, edited by D.R. Lide, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1990, US$ 99.50, ISBN: 0-8439-0471-7 , 1991 .

[29]  W. Kier,et al.  Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular‐hydrostats , 1985 .

[30]  W. Kier,et al.  A kinematic analysis of tentacle extension in the squid Loligo pealei , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[31]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  Continuum robot arms inspired by cephalopods , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.