What Can Decision Analysis Do for Invasive Species Management?

Decisions about management of invasive species are difficult for all the reasons typically addressed by multiattribute decision analysis: uncertain outcomes, multiple and conflicting objectives, and many interested parties with differing views on both facts and values. This article illustrates how the tools of multiattribute analysis can improve management of invasive species, with an emphasis on making explicit the social values and preferences that must inform invasive species management. Risk assessment protocols developed previously for invasive species management typically suffer from two interacting flaws: (1) separating risk assessment from risk management, thus disrupting essential connections between the social values at stake in invasive species decisions and the scientific knowledge necessary to predict the likely impacts of management actions, and (2) relying on expert judgment about risk framed in qualitative and value-laden terms, inadvertently mixing the expert's judgment about what is likely to happen with personal preferences. Using the values structuring and probability-modeling elements of formal decision analysis can remedy these difficulties and make invasive species management responsive to both good science and public values. The management of feral pigs in Hawaiian ecosystems illustrates the need for such an integrated approach.

[1]  Philip J. Harter,et al.  Negotiating regulations: A cure for the malaise? , 1982 .

[2]  J. Charles Kerkering,et al.  Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgment, A Practical Guide , 2002, Technometrics.

[3]  Michael H. Thomas,et al.  Intentional introductions of nonindigenous species: a principal-agent model and protocol for revocable decisions , 2000 .

[4]  H. A. Lingstone,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[5]  L. Miles,et al.  2000 , 2000, RDH.

[6]  Sarah H. Reichard,et al.  Predicting Invasions of Woody Plants Introduced into North America , 1997, Conservation Biology.

[7]  Maillet,et al.  What criteria are relevant for predicting the invasive capacity of a new agricultural weed? The case of invasive American species in France , 2000 .

[8]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Characterizing Mental Models of Hazardous Processes: A Methodology and an Application to Radon , 1992 .

[9]  Ord,et al.  Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment , 2014 .

[10]  Lynn A. Maguire,et al.  Research as a route to consensus? Feral ungulate control in Hawaii , 1997 .

[11]  Charles P. Stone,et al.  Alteration of Native Hawaiian Vegetation: Effects of Humans, Their Activities and Introductions , 1990 .

[12]  Robert A. Haack,et al.  Pest Risk Assessment for Importation of Solid Wood Packing Materials into the United States , 2000 .

[13]  R. Clemen,et al.  Soft Computing , 2002 .

[14]  Lynn A. Maguire,et al.  Resolving Environmental Disputes: a Framework Incorporating Decision Analysis and Dispute Resolution Techniques , 1994 .

[15]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Stakeholder Values and Scientific Modeling in the Neuse River Watershed , 2001 .

[16]  Olli Varis,et al.  Belief networks for modelling and assessment of environmental change , 1995 .

[17]  Storrs L. Olson,et al.  The Role of Polynesians in the Extinction of the Avifauna of the Hawaiian Islands , 2022, Quaternary Extinctions.

[18]  K. Reckhow.  Water quality prediction and probability network models , 1999 .

[19]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[20]  P. Finnegan,et al.  Eradicating feral pigs in montane mesic habitat at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. , 1993 .

[21]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[22]  W. Blatchford.  Getting a yes.... , 1992, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[23]  Charles P. Stone,et al.  Snaring to control feral pigs sus scrofa in a remote Hawaiian rain forest , 1993 .